FAC-25-0134
Published agendaHeard once, at the Board of County Commissioners on May 20, 2025.
Approved Staff’s recommendation with Commissioner Oakley and Commissioner Yeager absent from the vote.
Official title
Petition to Vacate Portion of Platted Right-of-Way (Regular) – BW 54 Cattle Gap, LLC – Pine Street, Tract 13, Lyon Company’s Subdivision – No Funding Required
Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording
TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 68% of 73 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
- 1
Approved minutes
Approved Staff’s recommendation with Commissioner Oakley and Commissioner Yeager absent from the vote.
8mStarkeyChairapproval
MarianoVice Chairconsent agenda.
StarkeyChairOkay, take a second.
MarianoVice ChairThank you.
StarkeyChairAll in favor? Aye. Okay, P fifty two.
StarkeyChairItem P fifty two was published in the Tampe Times on April twentieth, twenty twenty-five and april twenty-seventh, twenty twenty-five.
Unidentified speakerVoice AHi, good afternoon, Commissioner's Lori Joe Bryant from Real Property Division. The Real Property team has received a petition to vacate a portion of Platted right-of-way filed by BW54 Cattle Gap LLC. The purpose for this petition is uh or excuse me, vacation is to f allow for future development. And the team recommends approval.
StarkeyChairWell, was that the whole presentation? That is it. Yes. Unless you have any fault. Can you go back to the side? Can you go back to the map again? Absolutely. Um where
So that's an that's where is our road coming in?
Unidentified speakerVoice ASo it was platted where the where the outline of red is. Now m all of the rest of the uh roadway to the west has been previously vacated. There's no current utility applications there. Um so the rest has already been vacated. Yeah, I need to
Mike Carballabe able to do that.
And this this piece is not related to the construction or right of way needs for that facility, nor is the owner of that property um involved in anything or any other right of way that we might need to be able to do that.
StarkeyChairOkay, can you go back can you go back to that map? Um so this this portion above this red line, that is a commercial That's a developable piece, is that what you're telling me?
Unidentified speakerVoice ASo the the red area is the actual right-of-way the into A. What's the parcel to the north? The parcel to the north, um I'm I believe it's T T S W R something similar to that. Um but it is not included in this request. Oh I I know it's not. Yes
StarkeyChairma'am. Um who who was P who Who is requesting us to vacate this? The parcel to the south or the parcel to the north?
Unidentified speakerVoice AThe parcel that the right of way is currently in, so.
StarkeyChairMadam Chair? I don't know how to say that any clear.
WeightmanSecond Vice ChairSo you're saying there's three different property owners?
Unidentified speakerVoice AThere's one property owner.
WeightmanSecond Vice ChairFor all the
StarkeyChairpieces? My concern is, as always, is the orange belt trail. So I wanna know how that fits in here. Um As 'cause you can see there's a wetland right there, or a stormwater pond. So I just want to make sure we've taken it into account All we need. Because that road does something weird right there. You see where the E is on Gladstone Drive? How how is that possible? We're gonna skip over that corner?
So I don't I don't really understand what's going on right there as far as Design.
Unidentified speakerVoice ASo are you speaking for rangeland? Is that just to clarify
StarkeyChairin the corner
Unidentified speakerVoice Awhere it's
StarkeyChairright. I am speaking about rangeland and that weird design that someone has in the road.
Unidentified speakerVoice ASo his parcel, the the petitioner's parcel is there's a parcel to the south or excuse me, to the east, northeast, and then the one directly north of that contains the proposed
StarkeyChairyes, but we may need some of that land and so I you know, I'd rather horse trade. Um 'cause I don't understand this this drawing here. It doesn't make sense to me. Now maybe one of you road engineers
But That doesn't look right on the orange the red lines there. It gets narrow and then it gets wide. So what's going on right there?
Eric BreitenbachMadam Chair, if I could. Eric Breitenbach, Assistant County Administrator for Internal Services. That parcel is already developed. That's where the new Texas Roadhouse is, over there in front of next to Gun Highway. So in terms of any available land to put a trail on or have you, there I don't believe there's an opportunity to do that.
StarkeyChairWell this is north of that, right?
Eric BreitenbachNo ma'am. This
StarkeyChairred line?
Eric BreitenbachThis is that parcel.
StarkeyChairSo they built on our property?
Eric BreitenbachThe easement, correct.
StarkeyChairThat's correct. Okay, so who owns the property to the north of that? Is it the same company? It is not.
Mike CarballaThat is the developer.
StarkeyChairThat's Wheelock?
Mike CarballaThat is WheLock.
StarkeyChairOkay. Um how did we let give a permit on top of our property?
Unidentified speakerVoice AThat would be a it's a great question, probably one for permitting. Unfortunately I don't have that answer.
StarkeyChairWell,
That's interesting.
Okay. Well then.
WeightmanSecond Vice ChairYou good with this chair?
StarkeyChairWell um let's open it up to public comment since it's a public hearing. Does anyone else wanna try and understand what happened here? Does anyone else want to speak about this?
WeightmanSecond Vice ChairWe have a Texas Roadhouse. The number one Dining casual state dining state chain in America.
StarkeyChairDinners for everybody. Did you want to speak? Okay, come on up.
Eric BreitenbachThat was very minstrel.
Unidentified speakerVoice BIt's a vacation. It's a vacation. You don't
Unidentified speakerVoice Cneed to be vacant. Austin Simmons [address removed]. My partners and I own That property, the north side of the red line and the south side of the red line. It's all one piece of property.
StarkeyChairOkay. Oh, well see.
Unidentified speakerVoice CSo it's it's all one piece of property.
Long time ago there were thousands of roads that were platted out there. They were all over the place. They've all been vacated. Yeah.
Absolutely. Our our
StarkeyChairpress.
Unidentified speakerVoice COur surveyor did all the vacations. Yay, fantastic. We did a survey of their property. We use that for our development permit. Our surveyor said there's no We vacated every road. Fantastic. We built a building there. Y'all y'all permitted it. We built a building. Thank you very much. We appreciate it. Our second tenant, who was out there now in the middle of permitting, right now. Said, hey, our title company says there's a road there. Said no no there is no road there, guys. I've seen
the survey. I've talked to the surveyor who vacated it. They said there's no road there. Turns out there is. The road to the west, vacated. There's nothing to the east. There was never a road there. It's always been wetland. You guys have the road to the north which is rain uh Gladstone. Gladstone. Gladstone. You have your road to the west, obviously at fifty four. This is right in the middle of our parking lot that we built with our building which we built. And we're gonna build more on it. It it it was a forgotten no one at your department knew
you had a road. Well we weren't hiding it. Our
surveyors. I was just wondering how our staff missed it.
Yeah, thank you. Hard
StarkeyChairtimes are good.
Unidentified speakerVoice CI
Unidentified speakerVoice Bappreciate it. Thank you very much. Because he submitted a sa sealed survey that said there was nothing there. Oh we and we believed you.
StarkeyChairOkay. Um well we lost. Are we still okay to do anything? Okay, I'll take a motion.
Unidentified speakerVoice BYeah. I'll second.
StarkeyChairOkay.
Unidentified speakerVoice BWas there anybody else that that wanted to speak on this?
StarkeyChairI have no one on WebEx and there's no one signed up. Okay. Um all in favor?
StarkeyChairAye. You can stay open.
So we we moved P fifty-four, right? Fifty three. Oh, sorry, see I flip. I flipped to see what's next. Okay, so
StarkeyChairitem P fifty three was published in Tampe Times on April second, twenty twenty-five, and affidavits of certified mailings and site posting. The item was continued from the March twenty-fifth, twenty twenty-five BCC meeting, where it was continued to today.