PDD-20-0594

Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 92% of 52 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Jun 16, 2020
   Board of County CommissionersP5Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Open this item →No recording
2. 2Jun 30, 2020
   Board of County CommissionersP6Public hearingAdopted

   AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE … THOMAS ROAD AND LAND O’ O' LAKES BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR … AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt by roll call vote with Commissioner Oakley absent from the vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 33:35
   ▶ 33:359m

   Mariano

   33:35Anyone sex? That's P five. So P six.

   33:57Okay, my own.

   Madam Clerk

   33:59Do we have publication?

   Mariano

   34:01What

   Madam Clerk

   34:01for P six? Tampa Bay Times, November twenty-nint, twenty nineteen, and June twenty-one, twenty twenty.

   Oakley

   34:11Mr. Chairman Mariano Item Peace. Adam P six is PDD twenty zero five nine four. It is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps. MAP 2-15 and Sheet 20, changing from Res 3, residential 3 dwelling units per gross acre, and ROR retail office residential to res 6, residential 6 dwelling units per gross acre, on approximately 41.758 acres

   34:41of real property located at the intersection of Little Lake Thomas Road and Land Oakes Boulevard, providing for repealer severability. and an effective date and this comes with a recommendation to approve.

   Mariano

   34:55Thank you, sir. Madam Clerk, do we have anybody signed up to speak on this item?

   35:01We have callers?

   Madam Clerk

   35:05So the comments you just read, those are per P6. Yes, we have no callers though, but I do have the two emails to read.

   Tampa Bay Times

   35:11Okay, so l well I think we need to do them again. So they're

   Mariano

   35:14under the right item for the record.

   Madam Clerk

   35:16Okay. Um I'll start over. Pasco commissioners. This again is from Rob Park. I request you repeal the May twenty-one, twenty nineteen decision on an ordinance amending the Pasco County comprehensive plan regarding the parcel at the intersection of Aaron Cutoff and Caliente Bolt Boulevard or Tower Road, depending on which document is read, from residential one to residential six. See May 21, 2019, minutes, section P5, Memorandum Number PDD 19-0986, and section P11, Memorandum PDD

   35:4619-7367. Ordinance number.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   35:52So Terry, that that she just described Caliente Boulevard. And Well

   Madam Clerk

   36:01um and Aaron Cutoff.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   36:02And Aaron Cutoff. Obviously some

   Oakley

   36:04confusion here. Lake

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   36:05Thomas is.

   Oakley

   36:06Little Lake Thomas is right off of Atlanta Lakes Boulevard.

   Mariano

   36:10Little Lake Thomas.

   Starkey

   36:11North of Aaron Cut off.

   Mariano

   36:13I got it. It's Land O' Lakes Boulevard. It's Land O' Lakes Boulevard and Little Lake Thomas Road.

   36:21Right. There may be this may

   Tampa Bay Times

   36:22be close.

   Madam Clerk

   36:25This says Aaron Cutoff and Caliente Boulevard. Um or Tower Road, depending on which document is read.

   Oakley

   36:32Okay. I believe the um speaker or the emailer. Is referring to a comprehensive plan amendment that occurred in 2019 in the vicinity of Little Lake Thomas and Land O' Lakes. But it It is to the north and east. Possibly by half a mile.

   Mariano

   36:52Oh. So the area. Well we gotta let hold on one sec, please. Um Mr. Steinner. Yes. Um so it sounds like so if Terry's correct. Um

   37:10That would not be prudent to this

   37:17Well

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   37:19I I can't tell uh if if County Administrator is sure that this comment was filed for P6. I just didn't want the clerk wasting time reading it again. It doesn't it didn't sound factually like it was about this piece of property, but if we think that it is on P6, then we can go ahead and Entering into the record.

   Tampa Bay Times

   37:45Okay.

   37:48Well, do we we have more though, do we not?

   Madam Clerk

   37:53Same gentleman's second email.

   Tampa Bay Times

   37:56It still has time.

   37:59Okay.

   Madam Clerk

   38:00So um I'll continue the exhibits of the data that referenced traffic impact that was done before Aaron cutoff was refer resurfaced and widened in corners. The numbers do not accurately reflect the amount of substantially increased traffic after Aaron cutoff improvements. Some exhibits referenced in the Collier Parkway extension and Collier Parkway merge. This BCC voted on January 9, 2020 at the 1000 MPO meeting. For funding for the MPO, which included the MPO 2045 plan that eliminated the Collier Parkway

   38:30extension action items D and E in the January 29, pardon me, January 9, 2020 meeting. Furthermore, I disagree with staff's recommendation to approve regarding not being an impact to the surrounding area. That is false. Everyone on errand cutoff has one residence per acre or greater. Amending the ordinance will diminish the quality of life and the value of properties in this area. Second email, Pasco commissioners, please do not approve this development as there is insufficient local amenities like restaurants for that area. If you add another

   39:00development, then our already too busy roads will become busier and in order to drive out of the area to get something to eat. There are pleas and memorandum PDD 20-0594 supporting materials. Uh ATT five opposition letters not to do this for multiple multitude of different reasons. Please listen to the people and don't do what was done to the residents of Bahia Acres. and surrounding homes by putting a gun range in the backyards. Everyone pleaded Don't do it and it was done anyway.

   39:30State Road fifty four is a disaster. It is nice. If you like that, fourth 40,000 homes are approved off State Road 52. Great for them. Not every inch in Pasco has to be developed. Keep this area the same way your predecessors projected. Nice big lots with lots of room and views to enjoy the vibrant Pasco that is being advertised. Sincerely, Rob Park.

   Mariano

   39:54Thank you, Madam Clerk. Thank you, Secretary. Okay.

   40:01I'm just

   Oakley

   40:01Do yeah. Talking to me. You turn? Oh okay. Uh Mr. Chairman M Based on the comments that I heard, um, I think the the the email was Um suggesting that the traffic analyses that were done in the comprehensive plan amendment. uh from twenty nineteen in the area, but not in the same place as this is. Um that they that they were not accurate. But I I guess my response to that would be that all comprehensive plan amendments undergo

   40:32what's called the transportation needs assessment, which is a check against all against the current existing models that we have available to measure the impact of the land use from a transportation standpoint. We check that against the comprehensive plan's policies. We check that against the long range transportation plan. And then we go further and check uh the specific impact when when we look at the zoning piece uh of this of the planning program. We look at the timing and phasing analyses for the project to make sure that Um any impacts

   41:02to the roads are properly accounted for. um and upgrade it i if so if so needed. Um and then further to go beyond that, we also check the access and management when it's time for site planning. Um So But they referenced the comprehensive plan. The transportation needs assessment was conducted according to how the comprehensive plan mandates. Um and the I believe the staff at the time, the Planning and Development Department recommended approval for it. And in the in in this case

   41:32too, with Little Ectomus, the same process was played out. Um and there was considerable discussion at the various public hearings regarding the uh the impact of this on on Land Oakes Boulevard and the and the data was suggesting. uh that the project is able to proceed.

   Mariano

   41:51Thank you, Mr. Peters. Um any questions from the board?

   41:58Recovery. Seeing that I entertain a motion.

   Mariano

   42:06Move approval. That again.

   Mariano

   42:09a motion by Commissioner Mariano and a second by Commissioner Weightman Clerk Cullival

   Madam Clerk

   42:16District three, Commissioner Starkey. Yes. District four, Commissioner Weightman Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District two, Chairman Mariano.

   Mariano

   42:27Aye, motion passes four zero. Thank you. Uh we're moving on to P seven. Do we have proof of P seven?