PDD-20-7462

Published agenda

2 appearances between Feb 6, 2020 and Mar 10, 2020, at 2 boards.

OutcomeApproved by the Board of County Commissioners on Mar 10, 2020

Approved Staff’s recommendation including a revision to the Deed Restriction to also not allow ingress and egress as a route between County Club Road and the Sienna Cove Property Development through specific parcels and the update to the Finding of Facts with Commissioner Oakley absent from the vote.

Official title

ZONING AMENDMENT (CONSENT) – Salvatore A. Carollo, – Change in Zoning from an E-R Estate Residential District to a R-1 Rural Density Residential District – South Central Pasco County – On the North Side of Country Club Road Approximately 550 Feet West of Old Pasco Road – Containing Approximately 1.77 Acres

On a calendar

Feb 6, 2020 → Mar 10, 2020 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and ~~removed~~. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 85% of 184 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1Feb 6, 2020
Planning CommissionPC3Public hearingApproved
Approved minutes
Approved as part of the Public Hearing Consent Agenda.
Open this item →
34m
Denise
to
go through a few items that's got that are going to be pulled from the consent agenda. As I've gone through the audience, I've been requested that these items be pulled. First item is PC three, PDD 27462. Second item is PC four, PDD 27463. And the third item is PC nine, which is P D D twenty C U eighteen. Um and then if if those can be pulled and then I'll go over the regular cons the consent agenda.
GreyChair
Um let me just add uh another one, PC five.
Denise
PC five? Okay.
GreyChair
Alright.
Okay, so uh do I have a motion to uh you want to go through the consent agenda? Yeah we'll go through the consent agenda. Sure,
Denise
any else we missed. Thank you. PDD 27460 is Sun Trust Spank. It's a change in zoning from C one neighborhood commercial district to C two uh general commercial district comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
GreyChair
Okay, and the applicant present. Anyone here to object? So you make I see no objections.
Denise
Item PC two is PDD 20 7461. Daniel A. Miller Revocable Trust is for a change in zoning from AC Agricultural District to an I-1 Light Industrial Park District. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
GreyChair
All right, yeah, book and present.
Anyone here to object? No see no objections?
Denise
Item PC six is PDD 207465, Habitat for Humanity of Penellus, Inc. It's for a change in zoning from C2 General Commercial District to R4 High Density Residential District. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
GreyChair
All right. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? Alright, see no objections.
Denise
Item PC 7 is PDD 20 CU16 in the name of Florida FL Equities LLC Stasi's Italian Grill and Pizzeria for the sale of alcoholic beverages, beer and wine only, on premises consumption in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant with outside seating and service of alcoholic beverages on a patio in a planned unit development district. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as contained in your package. Yeah.
GreyChair
Yeah, is the applicant present?
I heard somebody say yes, but it okay. Is anyone here to object? Okay, no s I see another one.
Denise
And item PC 8, PDD 20 C U17, in the name of ARC Cafe USA 001 LLC, Applebee's Neighborhood Bar and Grill for the sale of alcoholic beverages, beer, wine, and liquor, on premises consumption in conjunction with the operation of a restaurant, with outside seating and service of alcoholic beverages on a patio in a C2 general commercial district. Comes here with a recommendation of approval with conditions. as contained in your ach in your agenda packet.
GreyChair
All right. Is that applicant present? Okay, anyone here to object? Okay, another one.
Denise
PC ten is PDD twenty seven four five nine. Heyman Fuentes, EC, M PUD, Master Plan Unit Development. And uh Heyman Fuentes Farmland Trust, it's a rezoning from M from an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to an employment center, MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District, to allow an employment center and mixed-use development on approximately 83.5 acres comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as contained in your agenda packet.
GreyChair
All right. Is the applicant here? Present. Anyone here to object?
Do you know what?
Denise
And that concludes your uh consent agenda.
Cox
Mr. Chairman, I'll move for approval the consent agenda for PC 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, and 10.
GreyChair
Second. Every motion is second. Any further discussion on the motion? All in favor? Opposed? Okay. So those items that you just heard are are passed on consent. If you are here for one of those items, you're welcome to stay, but or you can also leave. The uh the rest of the items, PC 3, 4, 5, um
Nine. Nine and nine. Those are the items that we're gonna hear today and talk about.
Denise
All right, we're moving on to item PC three, PDD 27462. Uh in the name of Salvatore Corolo. This is for a rezoning from ER estate residential district to an R1 rural density residential district. It's located in south-central Pasco County on the north side of Country Club Road, approximately 550 feet west of Old Pasco Road. The site is approximately 1.77 acres. The applicant proposes to rezone to R1 as stated. Future
land use is Res 6, which is the potential for six dwelling units per per gross acre. Surrounding the property, show you the surrounding zoning. If you look to the parcels to both the east
Unidentified speakerVoice A
and
Denise
to both the west, those are zoned R1, as is what the which is the zoning that this applicant is requesting. The parcels to the south are also. all zoned R one and there's also as um I stated E R in the area and then more R one um which is rezoning that have occurred throughout the years. Uh the land use in the uh for most of the area is uh res six, the potential for six dwelling units
per gross acre. Here's the uh an aerial showing the access to the property through Country Club. And staff on this item is recommending approval. I know that we have some folks who may want to speak on the item in the audience.
GreyChair
All right.
Denise
I'm here for any questions.
GreyChair
Any questions of uh Denise? Is the applicant present? All right. You want to come up and uh tell us what you want to do there? Give us your name and address?
Unidentified speakerVoice B
Good afternoon. My name is Jim O'Brien. I'm with L and L Land Development Code of Lutz, Florida. My address is two zero one nine Ospre Lane and I represent the uh client. What we're uh requesting today is to rezone the property, as was uh very well explained. Um to uh R1. Our purpose here is to split the property into two parcels so we can build two single family homes. Just very compatible with the area. There's been lots of precedents in that in that corridor
there with rezoning to R1. I'll take any questions after the opposition. Thank you.
GreyChair
All right. Great. Thank you.
All right, is there anybody that has questions that would like to come up and speak?
Yes, sir. Come on up.
You state your name and address please and then let us know what your concern is.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
Scott Winter, [address removed]
[address removed]
[address removed]. When uh We went through all the battles of trying to stop this development at the golf course and having our neighborhood greatly impacted by this and without the development having even started yet it's already been impacted by the apartment complex that is going in right there on O Pasco Road. We were told that this piece of property, because we knew who owned it and they were associated with the golf course, was not going to change. It was going to stay the
same. Yes, across the street, there are houses that have less property per the house, but they are also part of the Angus Valley, not the quail hollow on the north. northeast side, northwest side. And we are just asking when is it gonna stop? We just want to leave this property the way it was, the same as all of us, and the rules that we had to follow and keep it. at the zoning that it is now.
Okay. That's it. Any other questions? No questions, just would like to be represented by this and not have our neighborhood com impacted more. then we are going to be impacted when we won't even be to get out of that road on to And now we're gonna add more houses per lot. And when's it gonna stop and why can't we keep it the way it is?
GreyChair
It just from my perspective it seems like you have a lot of properties along that road that are of a similar size. Across the street. That is correct.
On that side of the street. Yeah when I'm looking at the plat, it looks to me like A lot of those properties are Very similar in size. And uh he's talking about building two homes on really what to me looks like a double lot. So I'm just curious.
Unidentified speakerVoice C
It's less than a double lot though. It's not two acres.
GreyChair
Well it seems like it's at least as big as some of those lots on that side of the street. So I'm just giving you my observation. Denise,
Chris Williams
can you put the map up please?
GreyChair
Yeah, that might help.
Yeah, see that that property looks like it's the size of two of those other lots to me. What are the sizes of those other lots? I mean I'm just I'm just looking they're over one acre for perspective. So
Chris Williams
Okay. The one to the right is just shy of an acre. Yeah.
GreyChair
Anybody else have any questions? Okay. Anyone any thank you very much. Anybody else like to speak?
How are ya?
Timothy Grantham
Uh my name's Tim Grantham. We live in the neighborhood. I was just curious
GreyChair
excuse me. Yes. I need a specific name and a specific address.
Timothy Grantham
My name is Timothy Grantham. I'm I live in uh [address removed]. Which is right off of you can actually see my property on that map. Uh I walk the co I walk the uh neighborhood every day. I was just wondering, have you guys? At all? Just looked at the neighborhood. Driven down country club. 'Cause six houses does not represent that neighborhood at all. at all. I mean it looks like it on the map because
we rezoned it. But not in reality. So if you guys look at the actual neighborhood, there's a lot more trees than there are houses, or fences, or people or dogs. So
GreyChair
Well just so you understand we're not talking about six houses.
Timothy Grantham
Um yeah, I mean I I see a lot of uh Dr. Getting getting I'm seeing a lot of neighbors and I'm seeing A lot of traffic being built up on that road is what I'm saying. And I'm and I'm also saying that um it seems that the neighborhood itself as it stands. Th not so much um, I guess you could say the people that were there past twenty years really aren't being represented. In a uh
Amicable way. I guess you could say. It just seems like this is what we want to do. We're doing it. Have a good time guys. Bye. And I don't know if the neighbors are really gonna take that lightly, in a happy way. That's all I really have to say. I don't really have like too much constructive feedback 'cause I don't I don't really mind personally. I'm just saying if we if we I think that we should stick to the style and the acreage of the
neighborhood itself and and keeping two acres or two houses per acre next and then bulldozing the golf course and putting Up to four to six houses, three houses per acre? that's not consistent with the actual neighborhood that surrounds it. Well this is the right-of-way.
GreyChair
This is not this isn't two houses per acre. This is almost two acres.
Timothy Grantham
Almost two acres if we're dividing it by half and putting two houses. That's in house per point eight seven acres? Point eight five? That's
Christopher Poole
similar to the one right next to it. So Denise, can you go back one more map? Can you go up to those out of the right-of-way?
Timothy Grantham
Do we have do
we
have like a Google Google images by chance?
Christopher Poole
Yeah, there's there's an aerial in there. Okay.
Timothy Grantham
There we go. So a lot of do we have a
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Yeah, that's something.
Timothy Grantham
If you go close right over to the left left edge here All of the uh highlighted spot All that stuff is trees. This whole area, this here. That whole corner area there is nothing. This area here is nothing. This area um all the you can see all the trees going up. This person you can't even see their house. So there's it's a highly wooded area is what I'm saying. There's deers that roam
f straight through that area. So I mean it seems on the map in numbers wise Like It's consistent. But if you go there, just go there Step out of your car. you'll notice there's a big difference between The numbers in the map what you see and what the feel of the of the area is. Kinda like, what if I just decided to put a Walmart in the middle of Dade City? Yeah, maybe
it might make sense. I have the space to do it. But it's not consistent. With the area. It's what I'm trying to the vibe I'm trying to give out, is all I'm saying. And I'm really nervous. That's why my voice is really shaky. That's all I have to say. Thank you guys.
GreyChair
Thank you. Thank you for coming. Yes, sir.
James Lusinski
My name is James Lusinski. I live at [address removed]. I've lived there with my wife, raised a family. We've lived there for 38 years. We've been through all of these zoning and proposed changes for the last 38 years. We've been up here often.
GreyChair
Excuse me just a second.
James Lusinski
Excuse me?
GreyChair
We're going to have to hold it down back there. Could you pull your microphone up just a little bit so we can hear you better? There I can't. Thank you.
James Lusinski
Anyway, we've lived here for 38 years. We've seen a number of attempts to change things. Approximately 25 years ago or so, an individual builder came through when it was R1 and built on lot lines illegally. He got away with it. We had a big uh there was a big meeting, and eventually the board agreed that it should be give the one exception and change everything. to ER Uh state residential. Okay, approximately ten years ago, somebody
owned that particular property and they wanted to build two houses on it. It was rejected by somebody in here because there's some kind of an easement, some kind of a drainage line easement that goes through that. But the third major concern that we have is that again, we still got some empty lots there. And if you start doing spot zoning, we've got no defense. We've been paying our taxes for almost forty years. A lot of people have been living there for twenty, thirty
years. And now all of a sudden somebody wants to make some money, an extra buck. He can have one house in there. Nobody's gonna argue. He can make money, he can have that for one house, which would s keep it ER. The whole area has been designated as ER. If you guys change things now Why do we bother with zoning? If we start changing stuff because somebody wants to make a buck and I understand there's plenty of property around here. He can do it. One
house, you built a heck of a nice house out there, they can make some money on that. He's not gonna go broke. But I don't think that you should be keeping changing things. When it we went through these battles, they're on record. And nobody is enforcing what you guys yourself and the and the uh Mike Moore and the commissioners you know have done. They said It's gonna be easy. And all of a sudden we're making a spot zoning change and I I don't think that's good. It also makes
people lose faith in the zoning system. Thank you for your time.
Cox
Thank you for asking a question. So on each side of this lot R is R one. And
James Lusinski
No. E R.
Cox
No. On each side of that lot is R one.
James Lusinski
Wait a minute.
Cox
Yeah.
So you see the subject site there in the middle, and it's R1 on each side. So there's
James Lusinski
a
lot
of Sir I would recommend please that somebody goes back to the records and see where that ER, when we ch got everything changed by the commission to that everything was supposed to be R1. Now there might have been an existing home and they said go ahead, but that was all ER.
Cox
There's a lot of residential one all over there.
Chris Williams
If you if you Sir Denise, can you show him everything to the right? There's if you look to the right, there's two lots there are R1. Skip two lots. They're R1. Skip a lot R one. R O
James Lusinski
No, that that's an old map or something because they are E R the the whole this whole uh quail hollow estates, it's in your records. Quail Hollow Estates was changed to ER. Uh E R.
GreyChair
Let me let me uh Denise to step in there and just can you speak to that, Denise? Are you prepared to do that?
Denise
Yeah.
GreyChair
Okay.
Denise
So the the parcel to the sorry The parcel to the west that R one is original R one, nineteen seventy five. The parcel to the east of the subject parcel, the rezoning was rezoned in nineteen eighty seven by Um the applicant. It was a a Board of County Commissioners initiated rezoning in nineteen in n in nineteen eighty-seven actually. It's in your finding of fact. It's finding of fact seven C.
GreyChair
Right.
GirardiVice Chair
So Denise, to follow up on that, there's a finding in seven B which may be what this gentleman's referring to. Yeah. Where there was a board initiative rezoning from
Denise
C
GirardiVice Chair
R where where were those lots?
GreyChair
It looks like these bigger lots over here on the top left.
Christopher Poole
Around the left, yeah? Yeah.
Denise
I believe I know what the answer is but I I need to fact check. Yeah,
GreyChair
fact check it. Thank you.
Denise
Thank you.
So some of the some of the those lots are gonna be off this map, but I'll show you. That rezoning that is called out in finding of fact seven B is all these lots that are within you see the green outline? Yeah
Jeff Kirshner
the heavy.
Denise
And then outside of that green outline, all the way going out this way, it's eighty acres of property. Um those were the ones that were from 1986, the Board of County Commissioners initiated rezoning.
James Lusinski
Again, I would also stress that this is called Quill Hollow Acreage. The plan that the master plan shows the entire thing. Uh there may have been one or two, but again we're gonna have spot zoning. I can't see how we can avoid spot zoning in the empty lots if you approve this, because this was supposed to be all ER one.
GreyChair
Well, I what from what she just read, that's not the case. It's they're on either side of this lot, they're zoned R one. Yeah, we zone this one ER. That's that is spot zoning.
James Lusinski
Well how do then then maybe you've got a suggestion on how we can spot stop spot zoning for the next person to come up and says, I want to change and there's some empty lots up there, we want to change this to R one, uh multifamily, whatever.
GreyChair
I I I would tend to agree with you if on either side of that lot there was only D R, but they're not.
James Lusinski
What about that what about that easement that they had in there? Because that was supposed to be there was some kind of uh uh an easement that was that's what we were told at the previous meetings with the uh county commissioners.
GreyChair
Uh the only easement I see is the one over here near the corner, which is which goes north and south. behind the ER which separates the R1.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
I'll try to show the drain the ad easement. There's a drainage easement along the western portion of property. and there was a drain adjacent along the rear. I'll show it on the survey, see if I can get the L Mobile Bells on it.
GreyChair
There we go.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
So um it's it's very large so I apologize. Uh but that
Denise
This area is the western portion of the parcel and the rear is the rear of the parcel and that's where there's drainage
Unidentified speakerVoice A
easement.
GreyChair
I gotcha.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
But all
Denise
that means is that the applicant would not be able to encroach into that great achievement. Right.
GirardiVice Chair
So Denise Sawyer on the subject, given the easement, what's the most number of houses they could build on these lots? If it if the rezoning is approved R1, what do you s in your opinion what's the most number of units they could build?
Denise
Let me take a look at the width that's
Unidentified speakerVoice A
easy showing.
Denise
The maximum number of units, if that means that if if all the units have access through Country Club Drive and you don't have like what's called kind of a flag lock, would be a maximum of two units. But based on the actual, if you look at the actual square footage, divide that into 20,000.
James Lusinski
Yeah. Is that including that easement or not?
The last time somebody was refused it, because we had a neighbor that tried to build and he was denied building because of the easement.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Um as you I'm not sure if that's shown well, but I mean there is um to the eas to the easement line there's approximately three hundred or so feet from front to back that can can actually be built in. Um so there's no air building.
GreyChair
Okay, well I just I just think you know, unfortunately you got some wrong information there and uh Okay. Um so But I wanted to make sure we looked into it to make sure you're either right or not right. So I want to get it right. All right. Okay. Thank you. Thank you for coming.
Gene Lezinski
Yeah, my name is Gene Lezinski, [address removed]. And my concern is that parti particular piece of property was battled with you guys about Eight to ten years ago we had this battle. And I'm not sure who the owner was at the time, but we've had this battle. And we won the battle because we had all this petition. We had this big petitions and everything else. No one wanted the change. No one wanted the spot zoning. to make it go through the whole neighborhood to alert the developers that yeah,
they're caving. There's some big lots left in there. There's at least four huge lots left in this area. And they're and you're not showing our neighborhood. Half of our neighborhood is cut off on this screen. If you go back and you wrap around Country Club Road and you go all the way in the back and wrap around everything is one, two, three, four acres. It's a neighborhood feel. It's it's a ambiance. And we want to keep that. Wesley Chapel is being destroyed
with density. Destroyed. Why can't we have our little... Secret Shangri Law. Can't we just have that? I've lived there forty years. A lot of people twenty, thirty, forty years. This has been denied before, previously, this request has been denied because they looked at the whole big picture of the neighborhood, not just that little street right there where it's, you know, some R1 in there. There's tons of ER in there with horses and Chickens.
This is still rural. If we allow this, the developer's gonna come in aha Great. See those big lots in there as you wrap around and go all the way to the back to Country Club Road? Oh boy, are they gonna be salivating? Oh chop chop chop chop chop chop doom doom doom doom doo house house. If you guys allow that, that's what's gonna happen. And we're asking you not to let it happen. Please maintain what you gave us last time. which is maintain the zoning as it is and let 'em build one house there. Thank
you.
GreyChair
Thank you. Is anyone else?
Unidentified speakerVoice D
Good afternoon, Commissioners. I'm Dave Marshall. I live at [address removed], which is about a mile north of this subject here. I live on 1.7 acres of land. My my concern is traffic. We take our lives in our hands every time we go on one of these roads, and Country Club is one of them, run off of Old Pasco Road. They were the reason Old Pasco Road is named Old Pasco Road is because it's been there such a long, long time. And no
one ever considered putting turn off lanes, D cell lanes, etc. So this property is coming here and and the nice lady that just spoke is correct about the map. When you go, it's a dead-end street, and it wanders a a lot way back in there. My friends I don't want to say they live on a dead-end street because that doesn't sound so good, but it's a dead-end road. And it's ER, I always thought it was ER one, large parcels. And when you split them up, the lady that just spoke, you
start in those large parcels back there, someone will be tempted to sell off a piece. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you for coming.
GreyChair
Okay. I asked one question. Sorry, only once. Huh? I asked a question.
GirardiVice Chair
Yes,
GreyChair
but
GirardiVice Chair
Denise, the MPUD to the north of this parcel, do you have an idea what its density is?
Denise
So the density for that M PUD is two point three six dwelling units per acre.
GirardiVice Chair
So is that more dense than R one?
Denise
Yes. R one is two point two.
GirardiVice Chair
Thank you.
GreyChair
All right. If there's no one else that wants to have to ask questions or the applicant. Okay.
Unidentified speakerVoice A
Before it gets brought up.
GreyChair
I don't speak until you get up here so we can record it. Uh
Unidentified speakerVoice E
Jose Biblioni, [address removed]. Before it gets brought up, they are improving the road. Down at the end, finally. Uh the only reason they're improving that road is because they finally took over the golf course. So before someone comes up and says, No, we're improving it so y'all can get it out easy. It's actually been improved so you can get in out of the new complex easy. It's not really doing us any favors. It's come out there some time when school lets out and see if you've got any kind of an errand to run. How long
it takes you to get in out of that road. Come out in the morning, And this is even before they open up over Pass Road Interstate. and see if you can get out in the morning with any timely uh benefits to yourself. So Yeah. I I I realize we're gonna lose this battle. I can see that. But the bottom line is this was a nice quiet residential neighborhood that's been chopped up. We've got the new mall coming in now that's being improved with all the containers and all that. That's going to add to our density once again. As well. as
the apartment complex which isn't really being brought up, which we were told was not gonna have an exit. onto Old Pasco and there's quite a big road being cut in there right now. I don't know if it's gonna be construction or what. All we ask is take these things into consideration. We're not here to oppose anyone living in our neighborhood. or to make a living. Just take into consideration we're there, we bought because it was nice and quiet and yes, it's exploded around us. We'll deal with it. But that's just uh that's all I really have to
say about that. Okay,
GreyChair
thank you so much. Um, any comments real for the school traffic or what kind of thing?
Chris Williams
I have a question not related to school. So Denise, you said if this was rezoned to R one they could feasibly put three houses there?
Denise
That's correct. Based on the it's one point seven seven acres, so if you do the math, you come out to three point eight dwelling units. Of course we don't do a point dwelling unit, so they can potentially have three homes on that property. Of course, it would almost you would almost have to create a flag lot because by definition R one requires a 100 foot wide lot, but it doesn't say road frontage. So
Chris Williams
So I mean I would be against three houses there. I mean I'd want to try to restrict that if there's a possibility of doing that. Um You know, if you recall, I was against converting uh the golf course to what it's becoming, but the fact that R1 is on either side, I have a hard time saying no no to doing that, but I would I would have an issue if they're trying to cram three houses in there.
GreyChair
Okay. Anything from the school perspective?
Chris Williams
No, I mean we're talking changing this from one house to two houses and so yeah, yeah.
GreyChair
Okay.
So uh would the applicant like to come up and respond?
Unidentified speakerVoice B
General Ryan once again, just to reiterate, um, as the board knows we have uh R six future land use looking to rezon R one. Uh we have no intention of building three homes there. Um I'd be willing to go with a restriction at some point, but through Denise to uh limit it to two. Okay, I ask the board to approve the project. Thank you.
GreyChair
Any questions?
GirardiVice Chair
Well that's just to be clear, you you cannot condition a equilibrium rezoning, but if the applicant wants to voluntarily deed restricted to two units, he could do that.
Sounds like he is willing to do that.
GreyChair
Is he willing to stipulate that? Can we stipulate that?
GirardiVice Chair
Well you can't stipulate but he can voluntarily agree to a deed restriction and then Denise would add that to the findings of fact when it goes to the board that it's he's voluntarily restricted into two years.
Cox
So we pull him back up and ask him to do that.
GirardiVice Chair
It sounded like he said he would. Yeah. Is that what you said you would do?
GreyChair
Just go ahead and get it on the record.
Unidentified speakerVoice B
Yes, I would agree to uh uh zoning condition that I would just build two homes. You know,
GirardiVice Chair
declare it's a deed restriction, not a zoning condition.
Unidentified speakerVoice B
Uh a de uh a deed restriction, correct.
GirardiVice Chair
Correct.
Unidentified speakerVoice B
Okay. Thank you. Thank
Cox
you.
GreyChair
So based on that I'll move for approval.
Henry
Oh sorry.
GreyChair
All right, we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? All in favor? No. Opposed? Okay. Motion carried.
2Mar 10, 2020
Board of County CommissionersP9Public hearingApproved
ZONING AMENDMENT ~~(CONSENT) –~~ (REGULAR) - Salvatore A. Carollo, – - Change in Zoning from … Rural Density Residential District – - South Central Pasco County – - On the North Side … of Old Pasco Road – - Containing Approximately 1.77 Acres
Approved minutes
Approved Staff’s recommendation including a revision to the Deed Restriction to also not allow ingress and egress as a route between County Club Road and the Sienna Cove Property Development through specific parcels and the update to the Finding of Facts with Commissioner Oakley absent from the vote.
Open this item →No recording