PDD-22-0011

Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 65% of 17 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Dec 7, 2021
   Board of County CommissionersP105Public hearingAdopted

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 15:49
   ▶ 15:493m

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   15:49Okay, P one oh five. Item P 105 was published in the Tampa Bay Times on October 6, 2021.

   Denise

   15:57P105 is PDD 220011. This is the set of package amendments. So it's Land Development Code Amendment 52. This is the adoption hearing for this item. This was presented to the Board of County Commissioners on November 9, 2021. It's an ordinance by the Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Chapter 500 Zoning, Section 511, RMH, Multiple Park District, Section 515, R2, Low Density Residential District, Section 516. R3, Medium Density Residential District, Section 527, Commercial Light Manufacturing District, Section 528,

   16:27I1, Light Industrial Park District, Section 529, I2, General Industrial Park District, Section 530, Supplemental Regulations, Renaming Subsection 530.14 reserved to outdoor illumination limits. Chapter 900, Development Standards, Section 901, Transportation, Subsection 901.4, Substandard Roadway Analysis Mitigation. Appendix A definition and other sections as necessary for internal consistency, providing for applicability, repealer for providing for severability, inclusion into the land development code, and an effective date. The proposed ordinances were presented to the

   16:57horizontal roundtable and interested parties meeting on August 18th, 2021, and on October 20th, 2021. So today we're asking that you accept public comment and adopt by roll call vote. This was actually also found to be Consistent with the comprehensive plan by the local planning agency and recommended approval to the Board of County Commissioners.

   Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

   17:15Um

   Denise

   17:15thank

   Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

   17:16you. I I do have one question and I think we this was brought up from uh by a constituent in my District that um lived on a lake and had lights shining um into their residence and a number of the residents had that problem. I actually have it living on the water when neighbors of mine have uh lights on their boat docks and um I can't open my windows many times at night, so I'm glad to see that we're having this come through. Um I am wondering, Sally Mm-hmm.

   17:47So when this goes through code will start enforcing uh giving notices. Are you ready to give notices for people to that they can't have those kind of lights?

   Unidentified speaker

   18:07First of all, we'll do an educational piece and then we'll notify individuals that um need uh additional incentives to remove the items.

   Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

   18:17Okay. All right. Does anyone in the um public wish to address this?

   18:26Webex. Oh WebEx.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   18:28There's no one that signed up um on this and as also there's no one on WebEx.

   18:35Uh all in favor

   Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

   18:36by roll call vote.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   18:37District One, Commissioner Oakley.

   Christine Bright

   18:39Aye.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   18:40District two, Commissioner Moore. District 4, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District 5, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District 3, Chairman Starkey. Aye. 106.