PDD-22-0098

Every appearance2 of 4 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 96% of 49 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 2 of the 4 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Feb 16, 2022
   Village of Pasadena Hills Planning and PolicyP4Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   An Ordinance By The … District Areas; Section 602.8 M.3.: Villages M.3: Village of Pasadena Hills (VOPH) … And Development Fee Surcharges And and VOPH Transportation Development Fee … And An Effective Date.

   Open this item →No recording
2. 2Feb 17, 2022
   Planning CommissionPC9Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   An Ordinance By The … District Areas; Section 602.8 M.3.: Villages M.3: Village of Pasadena Hills (VOPH) … Fees And Development Fee Surcharges Surcharges, And VOPH Transportation Development … Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Severability; Severability: And An Effective Date. Date

   Open this item →▶ Play from 34:24
   ▶ 34:247m

   Charles GreyChair

   34:24go uh PC nine. Uh is that w that's where we are now?

   34:31Yeah.

   Denise

   34:32Yes.

   Charles GreyChair

   34:32That way we can go back to the other one that David wanted to talk about. After that, yeah.

   Ernie Monaco

   34:49Dani the PowerPoint?

   34:52It's it's okay. Okay. While we're waiting, my name is Ernie Monaco. I'm the special district's manager, many of you know me already, for villages of Pasadena Hills and Connected City. In PC nine, I wanted to replace a chart. It is a sample chart that goes land development code. Uh there was a missing column. I think that column has been found. So I'd like to submit this as a as a replacement.

   Charles GreyChair

   35:14All right. We have motion to receive and file. Motion

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   35:17to receive and file. Second.

   Charles GreyChair

   35:19Motion is second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed. Motion carries.

   Ernie Monaco

   35:23Like this replaces page one sixty four in your packets.

   Charles GreyChair

   35:28Okay.

   Ernie Monaco

   35:28Okay. And I'll explain what this chart is as I fix the type of WC. And by the way, it's no specific part for the DCC meetings as your attachments. So

   35:48I'll just give you a little bit of a background for uh let me let me read the ordinance because it's important to hear it as well. An ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Chapter 600, Overlay in Special District Areas, Section 602.8 M3, the Village of Pasas in the Hills. impact fee, mobility fees, development fees, search development fee surcharges, and VOPH transportation development fee schedules in Exhibit six oh two dash three. Um A little bit of background, back in uh October

   36:1820th, 2020, Bill Oliver, who is the consultant the BCC hired uh to update the mobility fee schedules. He does this the schedules have to be updated every three years. The county has actually approved the countywide uh changes already that Bill has already produced, and they were approved in last September. Bill is in the audience and he can answer very specific detailed questions. If you have that. You have a copy of the mobility fees themselves for V OPH. Back here in the back of your packet. Um Anyway, when

   36:48he was doing the countywide update, Uh he had discovered that there were some text chart and fee schedule revisions that needed to take place. that we needed to improve the clarification for the people that are implementing the implementing the actual fees themselves. So that was the check text amendments, which I can quickly go over. Um There was a chart which you have in your hands now, which will replace the old chart, and then there are actual fee schedule revisions which are really about surcharge percentages and a new ancillary. use, land use, which is a residential use that need to be inserted

   37:18as well. Um Um w what had happened was there was really a a lot of people involved in this. It was height design, it was Bill, it was the Planning Development Department, and it was and it was David as well. So all of us had worked on this and and feel comfortable about it now. Let me see if there's a Clicker or no. Yeah, can I

   37:37So really in essence I've summarized the text changes, external fees You know, as you know, the external roadway fees are really 20 percent uh 20 percent of all mobility fees. Um, plus you've got bike pet portions plus twenty percent of surcharges. The external road account, it's uh this is a name change. We're calling it the VOPH fund to external roads. A lot of the issues really became with the implementation in our in our accounting group. Uh the the the titles need to be a little more accurate, a little bit more clear to help them. Put the money and the the credits into the into the right-of-way. categories in pots

   38:07basically. And then the VOPH fund is 88% of internal motorway plus 12% alternative transportation modes. The transportation modes are those golf cart tracks as ex our paths as an example. And then there were sample table and table notes to add the two the 2022 changes to present the impacts of the updated fees. Excuse me. Oh, there is uh I wish I could see that. Wait, what did I do? Okay.

   38:33But you have it in your packet. And basically what is you can see this one line item says Ann Slayer uses that was added. That was in the top one of that chart. And the difference in the chart here shows you the actual changes in the surcharge percentages, and it's really predominantly focusing on the multifamily products. We need those to be consistent with the policies of the BCC. At the same time, it had to be consistent with how we we give incentives for preferred development types. So, for example, conventional versus modern versus TOD versus TND, you want to encourage we encourage certain uses by actually

   39:03reducing the surcharge percentages. So you'll see that in that column there. So the end result was basically um what you see in this huge packet of fees for V OPH for years twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three, twenty twenty twenty twenty four and twenty twenty five. Uh what else can I say about this? Um I'll introduce Bill Um if he wants to come up and listen to the right-of-way. He's the he's the author of this.

   39:29David may want to add something to this. Oh but V O P H approved this last yesterday. They approved the recommendation of the BCC to to the

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   39:36Ernie said a lot of words, but the short version of this is The county is just trying to make the B O P H fees. Match what we already did county wide in terms of the mobility fees. And there were some of the surcharges that didn't make sense. So for example We had a fifteen percent surcharge on condominiums But a zero percent surcharge on apartments, which made no sense. So we tried to make them Match so that all the multifamily uses had the same surcharge, all the single family uses had the same surcharge. and

   40:06we didn't have these discrepancies. Okay.

   Charles GreyChair

   40:09Thanks, David. Do the ra he always rescued me, so I don't want to

   40:17All right. right. Any questions from up here?

   Ernie Monaco

   40:19I can just read the recommended pro committee action just so you know, to find the proposed ordinance amendment consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners for the VOPH Land Development Code Section 602-8-M3, text revisions, surcharge percentages, and revised transportation fee schedules.

   Charles GreyChair

   40:39Okay.

   40:41Any questions? Any questions uh for Ernie? Yeah. Okay. Any anybody here to speak on this? See no one? No one's online, right?

   Denise

   40:55We have no one online for this item.

   Charles GreyChair

   40:58Okay. Then uh motion.

   Christopher Poole

   41:01So moved.

   Charles GreyChair

   41:02Second.

   41:08All in in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign. Okay, Ernie, good job.

3. 3Mar 8, 2022
   Board of County CommissionersP46Public hearingNo action

   An Ordinance By The … Special District Areas; Section 602.8 M.3.: 602.8.M.3: Villages of Of Pasadena Hills (VOPH) Impact … Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Severability; Severability, And An Effective Date.

   Approved minutes

   No action was required as this was the first reading of the proposed Ordinance. The adoption hearing was scheduled for the March 22, 2022 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 3:23
   ▶ 3:232m

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   3:23No. Okay. All right, uh P forty six.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   3:27Uh Madam Chairman Members of the Board we have proof of publication of the hearing of the matter at this time for the first hearing in the February 16, 2022 edition of the Tampa Bay Times.

   Denise

   3:39Commissioner's Denise Hernandez, PDD 220098. This is the first reading on this item, so there's no action. Just uh please accept public comment. Um it's scheduled for adoption on 322 of 22. This is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Chapter 600, Overlay and Special District Areas, Section 602.8.3, Villages of Pasadena. Hills, impact fee, mobility fees, and development fee surcharges, and V OPH transportation development fee schedules, exhibit 602-C,

   4:10and other amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for applicability, repeal, or severability, and an effective date. This is back actually text revisions, uh chart revisions, and fee schedule revisions to um 602. So this went to the villages of Pasadena Hills Plan the Pasadena Hills Planning and Policy Committee on 216 of 22 and it was presented to the local planning agency on 217 of 22 who found it consistent with the Pasco County comprehensive plan and recommended approval to the board. Again there's no

   4:40action required today. This is set for adoption. on March twenty second, twenty two at one thirty in New Port Richey.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   4:47Okay.

   4:50Then we'll move on to P forty seven? No. No? Public hearing.

   Mike Moore

   4:54Rule public.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   4:55Uh we don't we don't vote on it, but does anyone want to speak to this item?

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   5:00We have one person uh signed up for the on the line Uh contact uh Bill Oliver.

   Denise

   5:10Bill Oliver is the county um consultant. If you have any questions, he's here on standby to answer them for you.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   5:17And we have none signed up in the room.

   Denise

   5:20Okay.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   5:21Well then we'll there anybody who wishes to speak to this item.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   5:24I'd said that.

   5:27But no one came forward. So we're moving on.

4. 4Mar 22, 2022
   GeneralP58Public hearingAdopted

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt.

   Open this item →No recording