PDD-22-0369

Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 43 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Jul 27, 2022
   Village of Pasadena Hills Planning and PolicyW3Regular businessNo disposition in the minutes

   An Ordinance By The … of County Commissioners Amending the The Pasco County Land Development Code Section 602, J. “Ben” J "Ben" Harrill Villages of Of Pasadena Hills Stewardship District, Revisions To Text, Table Tables, And Exhibits: Exhibits; Text Revisions to Section 602.08.M. Impact Fees, Mobility Fees, and Development Fee Surcharges To Single Family Lot Chart And Section 602.10 VOPH Transportation Analysis; 602.10.E.6 (D) Volume Over Capacity (V/C) Ratios Greater Than 1.2 At Intersections; Table Revisions To Exhibit 602-C Transportation Development Fee Schedules, Schedules; Revisions To Exhibit 602-D Property Owners Credits, Credits; Map And Table Amendments … 60AA, And Revised Illustration Of of Cross Section 70AA To … For Internal Consistency, Providing for For Applicability, Repealer, Severability, Inclusion … And An Effective Date.

   Open this item →No recording
2. 2Sep 6, 2022
   Board of County CommissionersP70Public hearingNo action

   Approved minutes

   No action was required as this was the first Public Hearing. The adoption hearing was scheduled for the October 25, 2022 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 6:13
   ▶ 6:1310m

   Oakley

   6:13Item P70 was published in the Tampe Times on July 6, 2022, and the Tampe Times on August 24th, 2022.

   Sally Sherman

   6:22Good afternoon, Commissioner. Sally Sherman, Assistant County Administrator, Development Services. We bring before you item P70, an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, Section 602. John Ben Harold Billage. Villages of Pasadena Hills Stewardship District revisions to tax table and exhibits. Tax revisions to Section 602.08 M impact fee, mobility fees, and development fees surcharges, and section 602-10

   6:55VOPH, Transportation Analysis, Tech Table Revisions and Exhibit 602. Development fee schedule revisions to exhibit 602 D, property owners credits, map and table amendments to Exhibit 602E, Master Roadway Plan, add new cross-section 60 double A, and revise illustrations of cross-section 70AA to include family bike paths and amend other sections as

   7:25necessary for interpretation.

   7:31Saverability and inclusion into the land development code and an effective date for PDD 220369 Commissioner District 1. No action required. Please we're asking that you accept public comment. No action it is required by the Board of County Commissioners as this is the first of two hearings and the second hearing final adoption hearing will be hurt held.

   7:56twenty twenty two at one thirty PM in the Newport Ritchie Chamber.

   8:05Well now your presentation, please. Yes.

   StarkeyChair

   8:08I'd like to hear a presentation.

   Ernie Monaco

   8:11Yes.

   8:11Uh could you flip the slide? Good afternoon. Um the the stewardship ordinance actually has a companion comprehensive plan amendment as well because there are the master rollbury plan is part of the stewardship plan development code. And now the the improvements on that are also reflected in the common plan that will come later. Next. Okay, um next we've already done this. We've already been reading the ordinance next. Um Uh I I actually was asked to w pr um in to present Joel to and Pat Gasway. They

   8:41actually wanted to give the presentation. I did the presentation but they want to actually go over it in detail. So I'm gonna turn it over to them and see if there's any questions that they can answer as well.

   StarkeyChair

   8:50You know what my question's gonna be.

   8:54I'm looking.

   Joel

   8:57Uh Joel II, two and associates along with Mr. Gasway at Hyde Design. We represent the two stakeholders. Uh this is a cooperative effort between two uh substantial VOPH stakeholders and the county. This is actually a county application, and just by way of background There actually are four companion items that you will have coming through your agendas between now and October 25th. The first two items are on your agenda

   9:27today because they are the two items that require two public hearings, including a CPA transmittal. So today you're going to see the Plan Amendment Transmittal, which is a subsequent item on the agenda that's on consent presently, and the Land Development Code amendments. The long story short and then I'm gonna turn it over to Pat to give you any details or answer any questions. The long story short is that the impetus for this primarily was a financial plan update. to serve as

   9:58the basis uh for the intermediate road network that we need to construct. Uh so it's an update on the financial plan analysis, but while we were doing that, Over the last couple years since the last update, there were some master roadway changes that either third parties or the County Transportation Department wanted that we agreed to add. And then all the other provisions really relate to the implementation of the new financial plan update. And then so

   10:28that financial plan update is the third item you'll be seeing. It only requires one hearing by the BCC and that's October twenty-fifth. So on October twenty-fifth, The Plan Amendment and the Land Development Code amendments will be back for second and final hearing on the same agenda with the financial plan update. And then most importantly, the fourth item is an item I've mentioned to you on two or three prior occasions. We have a global development agreement. Where these same two master developers

   10:58have agreed to pre-fund and construct a large tranche of VOPH roadways and utilities in the heart of VOPH to try to kick start the infrastructure there to get several projects off the board. So with that said, we're prepared to give you as much detail or as little detail as you want on first reading because you will see all these again. You're not taking any final vote today. It's just a first reading. But Mr. Gasway

   11:29does have a PowerPoint presentation. If you want to see the whole presentation or if you just have questions, then Pat will answer your questions, I'm quite sure. So I'm gonna turn it over to Pat and just let him know whether you wanna see the whole thing. Uh we don't want to consume unnecessary time, uh or he can answer questions. And if you have any for me, I'm happy to answer those. Um

   StarkeyChair

   11:53I just have some kind of general questions I think. Do you have any round are you utilizing roundabouts in here or red lights?

   Joel

   12:01That's for Mr. Gasway.

   StarkeyChair

   12:03'Cause uh we can't we can't tell and I can't tell if these dots are roundabouts or

   Pat Gasway

   12:10m Mr. Two um has effectively escaped the answering the the question. The answer is uh it is up to the developers during the implementation. We'll we'll go through the the uh design process of each of those intersections as they are developed. So So for example, the intersections that are in the examples in the master roadway

   12:41plan are designed to be able to reflect the rights of way that would be necessary if it were not a roundabout. And if we were to consider a roundabout, then obviously there would be details associated. With the uh creation of that intersection for the appropriate transportation. uh movements at that time. So it's a little early to tell.

   StarkeyChair

   13:06This I I was looking at um some of the designs in another development, not yours in the area. And it it had these I guess in our bike lane, maybe golf cart pass that And it uh pushing you into the lane at the intersection. It it it was an un Did you dis did you design those?

   Pat Gasway

   13:30We did.

   StarkeyChair

   13:31Okay. Well we can talk later 'cause I want to try and understand how those function. Okay. Um but that's why I was wondering with if you have roundabouts just And I see here in the trails it says meander.

   Pat Gasway

   13:45It does.

   StarkeyChair

   13:46Although the picture doesn't meander.

   Pat Gasway

   13:50But uh there's there's actually a a uh uh an incentive for the developers to to meander those because it creates a far better aesthetic and allows us the the room to be able to include landscaping partially in, partially out of the rights of way so it creates a better product for those that that want to to try and use that.

   StarkeyChair

   14:11And are you gonna consider this commun these communities a golf cart communities?

   Pat Gasway

   14:15Yes, ma'am.

   StarkeyChair

   14:16So Are they going to be in the road or are there separate paths for the golf cart?

   Pat Gasway

   14:21Uh both. Um in um depending on the type of roadway. Uh the two lane roads will have uh and the uh alternative transportation lanes within the roadbed, so Two travel lanes for cars, two travel lanes for the alternative transportation, and then curb lines, and then grass areas for trees and landscaping, and then the the in

   14:51this recent update uh we're reflecting eight foot sidewalks uh in those two-lane roadway sections. When we move to The much larger roads when we have four and six lane sections, those are the roadways where we do not allow the golf carts within the roadbeds. They are out separately on much wider multi-use trails. So they're they're in in these typical sections for the master roadway that you'll

   15:21you'll be adopting. They include those as the the roadways are are uh more highly used and have higher travel speeds, we take the golf carts out of the roadways.

   StarkeyChair

   15:33That's the one where it says seven foot plus five foot?

   Pat Gasway

   15:38Um actually that's a two-lane road. That's a very particular two-lane road uh called Hidden Creek Boulevard. Uh what I'm talking about is the um a hundred and forty two foot wide and greater uh typical sections where we have four and six lane facilities.

   StarkeyChair

   15:56Okay. I I W in whatever I opened up it's it's not in there. But good. Well I I like that. Cool. Um commissioners, any other questions? Not yet. Okay.

   16:10So no action is required by the board. This is a public hearing. Would anyone wish to speak to this item?

   Oakley

   16:19Okay.

   StarkeyChair

   16:20And I have no one on WebEx for this item.

   16:24Seeing no one commenting, we'll move on to P72.