Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PDD-22-7595

Published agenda

2 appearances between May 19, 2022 and Jun 21, 2022, at 2 boards.

OutcomeApproved by the Board of County Commissioners on Jun 21, 2022
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P70 including the modified conditions of approval to add Conditions 18 and 21 which were inadvertently missed and that they would have to do access management, P71 including ex-parte communication forms which had been submitted, P72 including ex- parte communication forms which had been submitted and a modification to the Agend

Official title

Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Pulte Zona Law MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Zona Lee Law, Inc. - A Rezoning Request from A-R Agricultural-Residential Zoning District to an MPUD to allow for a maximum of 130 Single-family Detached Dwelling Units and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 79.65 Acres, located approximately 1,300 feet south of Lake Patience Road and 2,300 feet west of US Highway 41.

On a calendar

May 19, 2022 → Jun 21, 2022 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance2 of 2 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 59% of 88 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

  1. 1
    Planning CommissionPC9Public hearingApproved
    Approved minutes

    Approved as part of the Public Hearing Consent Agenda.

    Open this item →
    13m
    Denise

    So would you like to I just have a question. Do you want to do PC five or do you want to move to PC nine?

    Charles GreyChair

    Um Well which which one's gonna take the most time?

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    My prediction is PC five.

    Charles GreyChair

    Okay.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    We'll take more time.

    Charles GreyChair

    Let's just do nine and then get that out of the way.

    Denise

    I believe Tammy Snyder should be online for PC nine.

    Charles GreyChair

    Was that you, Tammy?

    Unidentified speaker

    Yeah, that's me. Good afternoon, everybody. Cammie Snyder, um, Planning and Development Department, and this is PC nine. Right.

    P D twenty-two seventy-five ninety-five. Sorry?

    Charles GreyChair

    Right.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    Okay, so

    Charles GreyChair

    Who pulled this one? Harry?

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    There's somebody in the audience to speak to it.

    Charles GreyChair

    All right. So whoever Who raised your

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    hand on that? We probably should let the applicant say something if they want to.

    Yeah, oh okay, I'm sorry, I didn't

    Charles GreyChair

    Yeah, I didn't present. It keeps cutting out, I think.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Okay, well it becomes a problem. I I can think of

    Christopher Poole

    it.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Let

    Denise

    me have the clicker.

    Christopher Poole

    Okay.

    Denise

    All right, it's um PDD twenty two seven five nine five. This is the location of the um request. Um the zoning district, the existing zoning district is AR Agricultural Residential. It does have an MPUD to the west. Land use is res six. Uh the proposed is a rezoning from AR agricultural residential to an MPUD to allow 130 single-family detached dwelling units and the associate infrastructure on approximately 75.65

    acres. The applicant is requesting a few variations from the land development code, which include 901. It has a short plus or minus 60-foot roadway, which will serve no more than two lots, and a cul-de-sac would require a substantial amount of space. 901.2D driveway lane widths as to as a traffic calming measure. The applicant proposes an 11-foot wide drive lane as opposed to a 12-foot wide as required for a Type 1A street. and the same request for

    type two streets within the subdivision. This is the proposed master plan. The site is a parcel that is currently used for agricultural pursuits. The Land Development Code specifies that variations from the LDC may be approved by the Planning Commission, the Board of County Commissioners during public hearing held on the application for the MPUD. Variations are specifically, should be specifically allowed where the BCC finds that the proposed variations meet or exceed the intent of

    the code. As stated previously, the applicant is seeking variations from the LDC. And the Planning and Development Department finds that that it's reviewed the variation requests and found that they meet the intent. And uh the proposed request is consistent with the Pasco County Land Development Code, Subsection 402.2, Zoning Amendments, MPUD, and with the applicable provisions of the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan. The Planning and Development Department recommends approval of the rezoning request, and we're here for any questions you may have.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Three foot.

    Denise

    Yeah.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    Thank you, Denise, and Tammy, thanks you as well.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Clark Hobby, uh Hobby and Hobby PA 109 North Brest Street have been sworn. Uh Planning Commissioners, you'll recall that not so long ago, maybe six, seven months ago, we had another MPUD immediately to the north that was called Law MPUD. It was proposed by Pulti, the home builder. And Pulti has this site under contract. They're all part of the historic law family property and Grove. uh that the law family has owned in different entities

    and family members for many years. And at this point, uh this will be the third MPUD uh basically as part of their original tract of land. They're all in the South Market area. They're all in the urban service area. They all have Res 6 and as we proposed on the one immediately to the north The density we're proposing is considerably lower than Res 6. The net residential density is under 3. So we're not trying to max

    this out. Pulti builds a nice project and they're going to have a nice project here that I think will be a credit to the area. Just a couple of other things about the project itself and then some overall issues that residents May be concerned about. Number one, as I indicated, we have the project to the north. Our intent is to join these together. The sites will be interconnected as shown on the master plan. Uh in addition to the interconnections shown on the master

    plan, uh there's a highway vision map road that's basically called an extension of Wilson Road, which is a road to the south, that we will be building to our uh southernmost access point. that will provide access to both of these sites up to Lake Patients Road. Um you may also recall during the previous MPUD that we provided additional right-of-way for the ultimate widening of Lake Patience Road. Um so there's a sufficient

    right-of-way to make that happen if the county ultimately goes that route. One thing that we have heard from neighbors over time is they're concerned about getting out on 41. And for many years, DOT was against having a signal at Lake Patience in 41, but we understand that that has changed. And as part of this MPUD, my client is paying a proportionate or fair share towards the signalization, even though it's probably a quarter or a half mile away. From the site. So those

    are all good things. And again, I think the project fits in very well with the neighborhood. And if you just simply look at the MPUD master plan, the wetlands on either side frame the site in such a way that we really don't have any neighbors for about two or three hundred feet minimal from where the development activity will be. With that, I'm happy to be able to do that. to answer any questions you might have or I'll wait for our neighbors to raise whatever questions they have and then we'll answer them at that time. We have our full team here. Thank you.

    Charles GreyChair

    All right. So uh Is there anybody on WebEx for this?

    Denise

    We do not have anyone on WebEx for this item.

    Charles GreyChair

    So is there anybody in the audience that would like to speak?

    Could just come forward and state your name and address, please. And you speak right into that microphone.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Betsy Law Lamoy, [address removed].

    Several of my family members and I live on property directly south of this parcel being reviewed. I can't say that I'm really for it being developed, but I understand these things happen. My concern, our concern, is about a driveway, a road that provides access to our family property that has been in our family for seventy-five greater than seventy-five years. The small driveway that comes off of Purdue

    Road. it I it may be part of this eighty foot future vision road. Um I understand I've been told Sharon Law will retain ownership of this small road. It provides access to our property. It continues past her house to our property line, which is which is on the south side of the review property.

    It has been regularly used for 75 over 75 years to access the property. It's also a part of the historic, um, what was historic grove, law grove, as Mr. Hobby mentioned. We have we use it regularly. Also, Duke Energy's power line has comes down this road and comes to our Homestead. And so to provide pr power to that house there, which

    is a residence, that road needs to remain accessible and intact all the way to our property line. The road also provides an alternate route during flooding when access to Wilson Road has been has not been possible. This road goes to Purdue, as I said, which Purdue goes to Lake Patient and Lake Patient to 41. Also, GPS has been routed has routed medical personnel to the home by this road. So we would not

    want to have that cut off if that were to be the case.

    Charles GreyChair

    Go ahead.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Um this road was made over 75 years ago and has been used continuously, as I said. The use of it was conveyed. to my father by his cousin, W. C. Law, the owner of this property it generations back. It's been in use ever since. And I would like to just speak on that to save to keep that road so we can still u it can be of use.

    Charles GreyChair

    All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate you coming in.

    Anybody else want to speak on this one?

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    So can staff or the applicant point out where this road is that she's talking about because

    I'm not clear where her property is or where the road is.

    Charles GreyChair

    Yeah, I can't tell on this map.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Is it right-of-way? It is. Okay.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Yeah, see the diamond? That's the parcel now that belongs to Sharon Law and it goes right in front of her house, continues along with it right now

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    here.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    I think I have this is Clark Hobby. I think I have a simple answer here that may satisfy her. The area where she's talking about To the extent we are not building this new public road on it, we will be giving right away. So at all times it will remain open for you guys to get to where we build our new public road that's paved.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Ask that.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    We will be dedicating all the way on our site, we will be dedicating right away all the way to our southern boundary. So that should get to where you need that's right, where you need to be.

    It's uh it's r actually required by the MPUD conditions, but I'll be happy to meet with her afterwards and explain that.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    So how far south are you building Division

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Road Clark. It's to that access point I think is shown on the the master plan there. So if

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    we see if we can get it up.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    So it's

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    not going all the way down to that property, but you're dedicating right away. Right, would dedicate past the point that we built.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    But you're not touching the

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    existing road.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    That's

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    right. She'd be she'd be able to continue on her road on up to where the access point that you can see that's it's probably two thirds of the way to the road.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    for her to get on the new paved road once she gets

    Up to a certain point.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    I can I can say this much. We'll make sure that we don't barricade it if that's a question. I mean if somebody's got a historic right to get out there, we're not going to landlock anybody and keep them from having access to a county vision road.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    I'm just saying you might need to build some small driveway off the new paid road to get To her existing road.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Like I said, I I think I can solve this pretty easy because it's it within the area we're gonna be dedicating for right away. So if you'll permit me, I'll meet with her afterwards. We have Steve Henry here and we have the project civil engineer and we can ensure that we make a a an adequate transition there so that there's no loss of access. That wasn't our intent in any event. It's actually to provide more access.

    Chris Williams

    Okay. Are you building down to where the um double arrows are? Is that where it's It's right there. Right there. Right there. Right there? Right.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Okay.

    Chris Williams

    Perfect.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Okay. Thank you very much.

    Charles GreyChair

    Appreciate it. All right. You're welcome.

    All right.

    Mayor motion? Motion to approve PC nine. I second. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, I'll signify by saying aye if you approve.

    Unidentified speakerVoice D

    Aye.

    Charles GreyChair

    Like sign. If you don't approve, motion carries. Okay.

  2. 2
    Board of County CommissionersP72Public hearingApproved
    Approved minutes

    Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P70 including the modified conditions of approval to add Conditions 18 and 21 which were inadvertently missed and that they would have to do access management, P71 including ex-parte communication forms which had been submitted, P72 including ex- parte communication forms which had been submitted and a modification to the Agend

    Open this item →
    1m
    Kathryn StarkeyChair

    Okay. Are board members any questions? Would anyone in the public like to comment on P seventy one? I have no one signed up for P71

    Nikki Alvarez

    and no one on zone WebEx. Please keep it on consent. P seventy two. Item P seventy two was published in the Tampa Times on May 4, 2022.

    Denise

    P seventy two is P D D twenty two seven five nine five. Again, by way of housekeeping, there's ex parte uh communications with Each and every single commissioner, and those were provided to the clerk's office this morning. This is a zoning amendment, Pulti Zona Law, MPUD Master Planning Unit Development, Zona Lee Law Inc. It's a rezoning from AR Agricultural Residential to an MPUD to allow for a maximum of 130 single-family detached dwellings and associated infrastructure on approximately 79.65 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval

    with conditions as including. your agenda packet from the planning and development department and the planning commission. And there was a modification to the agenda memo. The only thing that was changed is just the recommended board action. By mistake, the board action the action to the planning commission was included instead of the board action.

    Kathryn StarkeyChair

    Okay. Okay. Um any questions? Is there anyone here in opposition to