PDD-23-0013

Every appearance3 of 5 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 92% of 228 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 2 of the 5 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Oct 20, 2022
   Planning CommissionPC3Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Regular) (Continuance) - CPAL 22(13) Hamilton … North of Zephyrhills Bypass.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 15:16
   ▶ 15:161m

   Denise

   15:16That would be one nineteen twenty three Plan uh Planning Commission meeting at one thirty in Newport Ritchie. Nineteen twenty three. Thank you. You're welcome. The next item is P C three P D twenty three's easy. 0013. It's a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment, C PAL 2213 for Hamilton Elks. The request is for to continue the item to the November third, twenty twenty two, Planning Commission meeting at one thirty in Dade City.

   GreyChair

   15:43November twenty twenty.

   Denise

   15:45November third, twenty twenty two, one thirty Date City.

   GreyChair

   15:49All right. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?

   15:55See no objections. Here a motion?

   Christopher Poole

   15:58Move to continue.

   GreyChair

   16:01We have a motion and a second. Second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Okay.

2. 2Nov 3, 2022
   Planning CommissionP6Public hearingApproved

   Approved minutes

   Approved Staff’s recommendation.

   Open this item →No recording
3. 3Nov 3, 2022
   Planning CommissionP6AdjournmentNo disposition in the minutes

   Open this item →No recording
4. 4Nov 15, 2022
   Board of County CommissionersP91Public hearingApproved

   Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment … 22(13) Hamilton Oaks - Providing for a Transmittal of Proposed Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment … and North of Zephyrhills Bypass. Bypass

   Approved minutes

   Approved the item per Staff’s recommendation.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 56:27
   ▶ 56:2713m

   Brian Junker

   56:27Hi, good afternoon. Brian Junker with uh Long Range Planning.

   56:39So here a large scale comprehensive plan amendment, PD D twenty three zero zero one three, Hamilton Oaks.

   56:48The site location, the property is located at 5930 Bilmore Road in Wesley Chapel, is located on the South Market area of our county.

   Mary Mcknight

   57:00Yeah.

   Brian Junker

   57:02Here is the map of the site location of the 5930 Bilmore Road. That's where the project is proposed.

   57:13The side location the S16 Fusion Line use flew for the project. Picked it earlier, Surrett three. It's current uh Fisher Land use. Oh yeah.

   57:27The proposed feature land use for the site is for REST six.

   57:34What could separate this bypass? Current zoning is um AC and it has um MPUDs about into the south and west.

   57:50Here um I included a map of the uh bodies and PUDs um just for a general idea. of the ones that are aborting to the west and to the south as well.

   58:05Here is the map with the uh with the vision road, the Zephyrhills uh bypass that will be going along the south side of the project.

   58:19The project overview, the proposal is a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment, amending future line use map, map 215 and sheet 22 from REST 3, Residential 3. Two res six residential six on approximat approximately sixty one point oh four acres of real property located east of Bilmore Road. Location. Um fifteen thirty, Gilman wrote. The resolution is to amend flu map, map two fifteen and sheet

   58:49twenty-two. Um there is also an associated rezoning petition under RC number seven sixty-nine, Hamilton Oaks NPUD.

   59:05The following policies are consistent with the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. We got flu A6 for the REST six and res three, the official the official future line use map. We got Policy Flu 8.1.2, South Market Area Establishment and also Policy Flu 1.4.3, Transitional Land Uses.

   59:33The recommendation recommends to the Board of County Commissioners find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and adopt by roll call vote.

   StarkeyChair

   59:42Thank you. Can you go back to the road network?

   59:48And so this is what I was kinda talking about this morning.

   Oakley

   59:51Yeah.

   StarkeyChair

   59:52Um Where where are the collector and arterials around here? I see the Zephyrhills bypasses coming along the bottom.

   Brian Junker

   1:00:00Mm-hmm.

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:01What are the north south roads?

   Brian Junker

   1:00:04To the north, uh we got um it's a residential, we got um it's called Ruben, if I'm not mistaken. Um to the south, um Surf Hill Bypass is an extension that is proposed for the future right now. Um Unless um the staff the developer want to um that's

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:23this is this is what I want uh for the county. That I think we need to be this is where I think we're messing up for For the future.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:00:31But this is a comprehensive plan amendment, so you wouldn't see the roadway structure.

   StarkeyChair

   1:00:37I think I can tell, but I see Barbara's moving over here. Um Are th is this neighborhood connecting to the neighborhood to the east of it? West of it? No. No. Connect connecting to nothing. So guys, this is where We are if we don't have a road grid. Set up for all these little developments that are coming in. They're not gonna be connected to each other. So at some point this county has to have and you have this opportun it's already kinda messed up on uh uh in many places

   1:01:07but We really need to pay attention to what uh uh the road grid is looking at out here or w our roads will be so crowded because There won't be enough of them. And there won't be this connectivity, so I I get don't you can't clap up here. Um I get really frustrated to see neighborhoods that don't talk to each other. And you can't get from one another without going out on a collector of arterial. I think it's not a good planning on our part. That's the

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:01:32state. Barbara Wilhite, [address removed]. So the answer regarding the network is you right off of this um aerial to the left, which is the west, there is Chapel Crossings Boulevard, also known as Uh curly road extension has different border of this neighborhood? It's so on our west is Chapel Crossings. And right off of what you see there You can't see the road, but to the west there there is I think it's called Chapel Crossings

   1:02:02Boulevard now, it's Curly Road Extension. So that's a Vision Road. Um and then to the east, you can't see it on this particular graphic, but To the south and to the east is Avalon West and River Glen Parkway is the road on the east side that goes north-south through Avalon West. It's also a vision road. to the to the south of this project is Zephyrhills Bypass Extension, a Vision Road. We are building our s our the next segment um of Zephyrhills Bypass

   1:02:32Extension. 'Cause right now it ends with the Chapel Crossings project, so that would be a part of this project is extending your road, which will be a significant benefit to you all. We are working with staff for the MPD conditions relating to that. We have a meeting on Monday. Um and with regard to the interconnections to the West The reason why there's no interconnection to the West is that the Board approved Chapel Crossings without an interconnection to us. So that's the reason why we're not interconnecting

   1:03:04is because the board approved Chapel Crossings to the West without without that interconnection to our property.

   1:03:12Okay,

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:13Barbara, will there be is your development making a stub out for an interconnection to the east?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:03:19To the east and north, yes.

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:21We are to the east, to the east

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:03:23and to the north. And to the north. And not to the south.

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:25Not

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:03:25to the west. Not to Zephyrhills Bypass. Well we're yes, we're gonna have access to Zephyrhills bypass and we have to construct Zephyrhills bypass. So the only connection that we won't have is to the west. to Chapel Hill, to that quadrant of Chapel Hills. Chapel's crossing to that quadrant of Chapel Crossing because the board approved Chapel Crossing not to have the interconnection there.

   StarkeyChair

   1:03:45I just you know, I'd one day I'd love to see what your vision is for a road grid before we really Everyone's gonna need to fly around in helicopters.

   Oakley

   1:03:56Where's Island Boulevard, Barbara? Where's Island Boulevard? Is it connected to this?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:03Island Boulevard is to the To the east.

   Oakley

   1:04:07Mm-hmm.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:08It's it's a ways to the

   Oakley

   1:04:09eastern. To the right or

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:11to the to the right if you're looking at this exhibit. To the right. Off the

   Oakley

   1:04:14map.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:15It's yeah, it's off the map a little bit.

   Oakley

   1:04:17What's the red line? What road is that?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:24I'm sorry, Commissioner.

   Oakley

   1:04:26What is the road on the I guess south? The the red line. Zephyrhills. That is the Zephyrhills Bypass

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:32Extension.

   Oakley

   1:04:32What is it?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:33Zephyrhills Bypass Extension. And this project um the county is getting the right of way for Zephyrhills bypass extension through Avalon West.

   Moore

   1:04:44That's not all built yet.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:45Zephyrhills

   StarkeyChair

   1:04:46by

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:04:46Zephyrhills at Chapel Crossings.

   Oakley

   1:04:53Well and the road's not there yet.

   Moore

   1:04:55No it's not. So it stops right here.

   Oakley

   1:04:57Yeah.

   Moore

   1:04:57See right there? Stops right right there. Right there. Okay.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:05:01Probably need to work on better graphics for you all for these presentations.

   StarkeyChair

   1:05:05Yeah, I mean I just think we need to pay attention. Um,

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:05:10there's one thing that I notice and is that you have done a lot with regard to vision roads and one mile mile collector spacing and Um and interconnectivity. The staff really is on this. It's one of the comments we get all the time from staff is regarding the roads and the vision road and and the interconnectivity and we are getting those comments and addressing them. Unlike other parts of the county where you didn't have vision roads and I mean the county's done a r a a pretty good job of making it.

   StarkeyChair

   1:05:34Sometimes we let those connections go away up here. And we need to not Mess up. That guy's and my

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:05:45and your staff is continuing to fight for those interconnections because we get that's like the number one comment we get.

   StarkeyChair

   1:05:49Yeah. Okay. Um I still have no idea where it is, but I just wanted to make that that comment.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:05:58Yeah, it's just it's just north of Babylon West, which was approved as Gosh, New River, I guess. But it's Avalon West now. So it's off it's north of fifty four? North of fifty four, yep. So Zephyrhills bypass comes off of fifty-four. goes through Chapel Crossings, And then this project is the next project over from Chapel Crossings. To the south is Avalon West and to our not immediate east, but the next parcel over is Avalon West as well. There

   1:06:29we go. So you can see trouble crossings.

   StarkeyChair

   1:06:33Now where are we at? Okay, so overpass.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:06:36Oh well mine has overpass. This is Seth Hills bypass extension right here. This excuse me, this is this is the intersection of State Road 54 and pro and um Curly Road.

   StarkeyChair

   1:06:49Okay.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:06:49Then you're coming along here, you're driving down the 54. You used to drive along here. Now you can go this way and go through Chapel Crossings. This is curly road extension here. It's been built through Chapel Crossings. And then Chapel and then Zephyrhills Bypass stops right there. And we'll be extending it from here. to this project right here. So it sits right beside Chapel Crossings. This is Avalon Park West. This is their project. Up

   1:07:20here is Um V-O-P-H de Pew Nut Ranch, which is just came through as a comp plan amendment to change the village type to be of a more dense village type. and they're working on their M PUD. So this area is really I mean we're just a b one of the last pieces of the development of what's already been put in place for this area. So is

   StarkeyChair

   1:07:41isn't Avalon Park supposed to be kinda like a T and D?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:07:44Yeah, they do have a a portion of it where they have the I see them advertising events and the topics.

   StarkeyChair

   1:07:49But I don't where are they connecting to anybody?

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:07:51You can't see the all the roads on here, but tell your

   StarkeyChair

   1:07:53one I because I I see I see them only emptying on to fifty four. But anyway, that's not for today.

   Nectarios Pittos

   1:07:59Yeah.

   StarkeyChair

   1:07:59That's just kinda my point.

   Nectarios Pittos

   1:08:00Just for your uh it is a T O D Transit Oriente Development Evalon Park. Okay. And they do connect to Zephyrhills bypass as well.

   StarkeyChair

   1:08:08Yeah, I see the one.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:08:10Okay. River Glen Parkway is a north. River Glen Parkway is a north south and goes that River Glen Parkway goes through Avalon West, will continue through the Pew Night. So app so River Glen Parkway goes through Avalon West, will continue through De Pew Nut and goes through Watergrass. It's called Watergrass Parkway and keeps going north. So I mean V O P H is a pretty robust uh network as well, which this this has to fit within.

   StarkeyChair

   1:08:35So Okay, thank you. Um this is a public hearing. Does anyone else want to speak on this?

   1:08:42Do we have anyone online?

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   1:08:44There's no one signed up and I have no one online for this. Okay, I'll take that motion again. Oh,

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:08:47I didn't

   StarkeyChair

   1:08:48do it.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   1:08:50All in favor?

   StarkeyChair

   1:08:50Aye. Aye. Aye. Thank you. Uh P ninety two.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   1:08:53Item P ninety two was published in the Tampa Times on April twentieth, twenty twenty-two, and September seventh, twenty twenty-two.

5. 5Jan 10, 2023
   Board of County CommissionersP55Public hearingAdopted

   Large-Scale An Ordinance Amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Regular) - CPAL 22(13) Hamilton Oaks - Plan; Providing for a Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Amending to the Future Land Use Map (Maps (Map 2-15 and Sheet 22) from RES-3 (RESIDENTIAL Res-3 (Residential 3 DU/GA) Du/Ga) to RES-6 (RESIDENTIAL Res-6 (Residential 6 DU/GA) Du/Ga) on approximately Approximately 61.04 Acres of Real Property, Property Located at East of Billmar Road and Road, North of Zephyrhills Bypass. Bypass; and Providing for Additional Text Amendments as Necessary for Internal Consistency; Providing for a Repealer, Severability, and an Effective Date.

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 0:00
   ▶ 0:0018m

   Starkey

   0:00The Tampe Times on October 9, 2022. Thank

   OakleyVice Chair

   0:03you. Mr. Pleethill. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh item P fifty-five is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, Map 2-15 and Sheet 22, from Res 3, residential three dwelling units per gross acre to res six residential six dwelling units per gross acre on approximately 61. 1.04 acres of real property located at east of Bilmer Road, north of Zephyrhills bypass, and providing for additional text amendments

   0:33as necessary for internal consistency, providing for appealer, severality, and effective date. This comes with a recommendation for uh uh approval. And this is the adoption hearing for this comprehensive plan amendment. Now there may have been, just a clarification, there may have been a technical glitch in which what was illustrated in the agenda packet was a transmittal hearing agenda memo. Um but as I'm checking the

   1:03system right now it's it's showing as the adoption memo. So we passed out a revised adoption motion uh agenda hearing, agenda memo with the proper adoption motion.

   MarianoChair

   1:13Okay. That was the change of the revised edition. I'm sorry? That was the change of the re revised edition that we just covered.

   OakleyVice Chair

   1:20Well we provided it just in case uh the the glitch was persisting in the system. But I I'm I'm bringing up the correct uh agenda memo off the website right now.

   MarianoChair

   1:32Okay.

   1:36Any more presentation or we're gonna hear from the applicant?

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:41Well it's an ordinance, so normally it would be you'd have a staff presentation.

   OakleyVice Chair

   1:46Okay. Right, we can make a presentation.

   Brian Junker

   1:57Hi, good afternoon. Brian with Long Range Planning.

   MarianoChair

   2:01Hi Brian.

   Brian Junker

   2:01Hi.

   2:04So today's project is um PDD 220013, Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPOL 2213, Hamilton Oaks.

   2:16This is the um ordinance right.

   2:20The property is located in the South Market area.

   2:26The proposed project about the village of Pasadena, B O P H um to the south, Village M. There is a map just so you get a general location.

   2:40That's the um project overview proposal, large scale comprehensive plan amendment, amending feature land use map two fifteen and sheet twenty-two. From residential three to residential six on approximately sixty one point zero four acres of real property located east of Bilmore Road and north of Surf Hill Bypass. It's the address. The resolution is to amend the flu map Two dash fifteen and sheet twenty

   3:10two. Um there is an associated rezoning petition under RC seventy six sixty nine, Hamilton Oaks, MPUD.

   3:22Um the following policies are consistent with the proposed comprehensive plan amendment.

   3:30We got our site location. Oh the subject property.

   3:38We got a visual roadmap of the Surf Hill bypass just south of the proposed project.

   3:48Here is a zoom out version of the Vision Road with the proposed ulterior. You can see on purple going south of the proposed project. Thus every hill bypassed.

   4:03We got the site location at sixteen um future land use. At the moment it's rest three.

   4:14Proposed future land use is res six.

   4:22That's a map of the um current zoning is um AC. You got M P U D abutting to the um west and south.

   4:33Here is a map with a site location of the um MPUD that is that are aborting the proposed um site to the west south

   4:47The recommendation recommends the Board of County Commissioners find a proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and adopt by roll poll vote.

   4:59Any questions?

   MarianoChair

   5:00Thank you. Any questions for staff?

   5:05Mr. Commissioner Bradford?

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   5:07I've got one question that pertains to uh fire. I know in the past, but uh is this would be a a uh question for the county administrator. Is there a like is there a reason

   Unidentified speaker

   5:22why thank you is there a reason why we don't uh have a comment from fire on this proposal? Have we ever done those?

   Mike Carballa

   5:33I'd have to defer to staff as to what what comments were were collected from the various departments.

   5:40But no, to answer your question, if there were none, I'm not aware of a

   Brian Junker

   5:42reason why. Yes, correct. On the um when the plan was sent to the fire department for review, um they replied back that they didn't have any comment at the moment for the uh proposed project.

   OakleyVice Chair

   5:57Thank you. Mr. Chairman Mariano, just to have a question. Um

   6:06This proje what's the this is res three and you're ask they're asking to move it to res six. What's what's around this area and uh residential units? Say to the south of it, to the west of it?

   6:23all around this this project.

   Brian Junker

   6:27Well all around the project we actually have Chapel Crossing M PUD. We also have Avalon Park um M PUD to the south. Chapel Crossing MPUD will be um to the west.

   OakleyVice Chair

   6:43And Air Warts, Arizona. Um sonning

   Brian Junker

   6:47currently is zone AC, Recultural, does the current zoning, Fisher Land use, proposed res from Rest three? So there's no

   OakleyVice Chair

   7:02res there's no res three around this project?

   Brian Junker

   7:05Um no.

   OakleyVice Chair

   7:10And it's a very dense project and You're gonna put in the middle of A C

   7:17Am I looking that wrong

   OakleyVice Chair

   7:19or

   7:23So the the proposed project is going to be at a density of six twelve units per gross acre. which would be uh similar to the densities in uh Chapel Crossing to the west and uh similar to the densities that one might expect north in villages of Pasadena Hills um which off the top of my head I don't have the exact densities for villages M and L I believe that are there but it I think they they are around the five Dwelling unit breaker

   7:54mark as well.

   7:57Oh yeah, yeah, it's okay.

   Amy Heiler

   7:58Hi, Amy, Highland Long Range Planning. Um so to the north it's actually V O P H. So that's gonna be Villages L M. It's currently Res One, but it is planned as Villages L M, which is a higher density residential. Um and the subject property it is uh mending to a res six, but they're actually proposing about a res four right now. We just don't have that. That flu classification between a res three and a res six. So they're capping the density as approximately a res four.

   8:29Correct. Okay.

   OakleyVice Chair

   8:31All right. But isn't uh V O P H if I'm not mistaken, isn't that Um

   8:40different villages. I mean they're separated but there's land in between.

   Amy Heiler

   8:44Correct. Yep, that's correct. Yeah, and this village uh is I

   OakleyVice Chair

   8:50just wanna make sure it fits 'cause some day or other we decide we're not having forty and pitch foot lots. Every project comes up you approve the zoning and the next thing comes up and it continues to be forty and fifty foot lots. So sometime or other there's gotta be some kind of uh Step back from that or everything will be forty and fifty foot lots. That's all my concern is.

   MarianoChair

   9:13So let me ask you a question. Chapel Crossings, it is a M P U D, but are there any forty or fifty l foot lots over there?

   Amy Heiler

   9:21Uh that I don't know right now, but we can find the answer to that if necessary.

   MarianoChair

   9:26Okay. How quick can we find that answer out? Because it's a big discussion we had today about forty, fifty foot watts.

   Amy Heiler

   9:32Sure. Um I can try to hunt it down real quick.

   MarianoChair

   9:35Okay.

   Amy Heiler

   9:35Sure.

   MarianoChair

   9:36Thank you.

   Amy Heiler

   9:37Okay.

   Starkey

   9:40Well I I'm gonna say something that you heard me say this morning. Can you put the previous map up?

   9:48Not that one. Sorry, not that one. That one. Uh no. No. It's too late now. But this is no the

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   9:57future lanius map is the right-of-way.

   Brian Junker

   10:02Okay, we got feature land use existing. That w

   Starkey

   10:04that'll work.

   Brian Junker

   10:05Okay.

   Starkey

   10:06My issue, it's too late. is that Asbury is not connecting to it. That's what? That Asbury isn't should be connecting to it and it's not. We we can't we just really have to not let that happen. That is very bad planning.

   Unidentified speaker

   10:27So

   MarianoChair

   10:28okay Commissioner Bradford.

   Unidentified speaker

   10:30So it's not connected with uh Zephyrhills bypass?

   MarianoChair

   10:35No.

   Unidentified speaker

   10:36And that continues on as they build that?

   MarianoChair

   10:38Well, Asbury connects in the middle part and Commissioner Starkey was saying she wish it went straight across through the next developmental.

   10:47But it's already built out.

   Starkey

   10:49It's already done. It's not something we can do now. But I'm just saying we if you look and if you look down below and you see Inkly quart and whatever again I don't know what's coming to the right of that, but that should have been connected as well. And then we don't have the gridlock.

   OakleyVice Chair

   11:08When you only come out on one route.

   Starkey

   11:11You when you have multiple ways to go, you you avoid a good one.

   Brian Junker

   11:15Um to answer Commissioner Pratt for question, yes, Safer by ha uh bypass It's gonna be constructed um all the way up to the project. Right, let me see up to this area right here. Right. And that surface here is uh developer driven, so it's gonna be up to the uh project. As so far the information that we have.

   MarianoChair

   11:47So to be to be clear about the answer about Zephyrhills bypass being constructed, it's gonna be instructed completely in front of the property, the whole boundary.

   OakleyVice Chair

   11:56Um t typically the developments bring the road to the to just about their entrance so that they can have access into the development, maybe a little bit beyond it, but not the entire length.

   MarianoChair

   12:08Well but as far as their entire property lines should be covered.

   OakleyVice Chair

   12:13In order for them to have access, yeah.

   MarianoChair

   12:15So n not only just the access coming in, but to the end of the end of the bolted property lines, we should have that road Zephyrhills built. Why should we follow on the next person?

   OakleyVice Chair

   12:24Uh I think the the standard the typical practice has been that they build up to their access point and then the next development that comes along extends from that access point to the very next one. So

   MarianoChair

   12:40Why why why would I end it at their property line?

   OakleyVice Chair

   12:44Because we know that's the right-of-way. Because it's excess road that's not going to be used until the next development whenever it is comes in.

   MarianoChair

   12:49I know, but why should that follow on the next guy coming in? It should be everything in the front of that property should be taken care of, I would think.

   Mike Carballa

   12:55I think what Terry's trying to say is is that the next guy will take it to his entrance. We're trying to avoid build building excessive roads that we need to maintain and they also long stretches of dead end roads lead to problems such as illegal dumping and other problems that that come with with things like that. So it works out on the averages because you're building entrance to entrance. And that's what that's what planning's policy is.

   MarianoChair

   13:17Okay.

   Mike Carballa

   13:19Logical.

   MarianoChair

   13:22Okay. Any other

   OakleyVice Chair

   13:25questions

   MarianoChair

   13:25for staff? Mr.

   OakleyVice Chair

   13:26Chairman Mariano We do have the answer to your question on the 40s and 50s. Thank you.

   Amy Heiler

   13:31We have a slight answer to your question. So the Chapel Crossings, which is abutting this property, is currently planned or approved or being under the approval process for the forty and fifty foot wide lots. Hamilton Oaks is envisioned to align with that, which is why they're proposing. the 50-foot wide lots. There is also currently an MPUD to the north, which is the village's L and M, under review right now. So we're also finding that information as well for you.

   MarianoChair

   14:01Okay. Thank you.

   14:07Uh any other questions for staff? No? The applicant?

   Barbara Wilhite

   14:21Barbara Will Height 6327 Graham Boulevard, Newport Ritchie, for the applicant. I don't have a lot to add to staff's presentation, other than I would note that Chapel Crossing is approved for 40s and 50s. They have a land use of Res 6, which allows a maximum of six units for developable acre, and also ROR, which allows a maximum of 24 units per developable acre. To our south is Avalon West. similar lots. It's um it's a PD, it's planned development, so it

   14:51doesn't have a res category. And we are coordinating with um to the north, because DePew Ranch has plans in We are providing connections to our north and to our east. Our southern connection will be to Zephyrhills Bypass, which we will continue. We have a meeting on Thursday to talk about Zephyrhills Bypass with your staff. to talk about the issue that you're raising. Are we going to the driveway? Are we going to the end? of our parcel. So that's um teed up for for Thursday. We are working on the M PUD and those

   15:21are the details of that's why we have that meeting set up. So we'll be discussing that with With the planning staff and there's a whole bunch of people in that meeting um on Thursday. So we'd ask for your support in transmitting the Comp Plan amendment is consistent. Um with everything that's around it. We know we've got some questions in about zoning and lots sizes and all the things you've been discussing from the DIES. We're keenly aware of that. And we'll work with your staff and yourselves to make sure that you don't have any concerns

   15:52as the MPD comes forward.

   15:57And I do have a team. If you have any other particular questions, I have my team here.

   MarianoChair

   16:05Well, let me bring up the conversation about the forty foot, fifty foot miles. Uh even though they are around, do we want to see more of them or do we want to see less of them? Do you wanna see more do you wanna see more forty foot lots or do you wanna

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   16:19Commissioner, this wouldn't be the time that you'd make that decision. This is the comprehensive plan. So as long as res six is appropriate for this area What size lots would be a decision that would be made during your MP and D discussions of the of the zoning? Okay. Yeah. I

   OakleyVice Chair

   16:38understand that. That's uh and there's gonna be more of a res four than a res six, so Yeah. I'll move for approval.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   16:48Okay. So it may not be anybody, but you still have a have a public hearing.

   MarianoChair

   16:52Uh so this is the public hearing. Is anyone here in the audience would like to speak to this item? Do we have anybody on Web WebEx?

   17:01Okay. So we'll close public comment.

   17:06We have a motion? No.

   OakleyVice Chair

   17:08Yeah. I move for approval.

   MarianoChair

   17:11Okay. Second? Okay. And a roll call vote?

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   17:16Do we have Commissioner Weightman here this afternoon? He was on earlier.

   Starkey

   17:20Did we take public Mr. Hudson? Yep.

   17:25We cannot see you, but we can hear you.

   Weightman

   17:28Oh I I can see myself.

   Starkey

   17:30Now we see you.

   Unidentified speaker

   17:32Seth

   MarianoChair

   17:33Seth We can see ya. You need to go to bed. Back to prime time.

   Starkey

   17:37Like magic.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   17:38Okay. So yes, you'll need a roll call vote.

   Starkey

   17:41Okay. District one, Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Weightman.

   Weightman

   17:46I'll support this item today, but... I I really want to emphasize that Bend Resolve here needs to be a high quality product and matching Only resident. Standards. So that called.

   Starkey

   18:05District three, Commissioner Starkey. District four, Commissioner Bradford.

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   18:10Aye.

   Starkey

   18:11District five Chairman Mariano.

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   18:13Aye.

   MarianoChair

   18:18Okay. Motion passes.