PDD-24-7745
Published agenda2 appearances between Nov 16, 2023 and Jan 23, 2024, at 2 boards.
Approved Staff’s recommendation.
Official title
Zoning Amendment (Consent) – State Road 52 Industrial LLC – Change in Zoning from an I-1 Light Industrial Park District and a C-2 General Commercial District to a C-2 General Commercial District – West Central Pasco County – North Side of State Road 52 East and west of Rhombus Court – Containing Approximately 3.69 Acres
On a calendar
Nov 16, 2023 → Jan 23, 2024 · click a mark to jump to that appearance
Every appearance1 of 2 are in a recording
Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.
TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 86% of 72 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 2 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.
- 1Open this item →No recording
- 2
Zoning Amendment (Consent) – … Road 52 East and
westWest of Rhombus Court – Containing Approximately 3.69 AcresApproved minutes
Approved Staff’s recommendation.
2m1/2Ron OakleyChairMove to continue time certain. Uncertain. Uncertain. Uncertain. Uncertain. Second. And a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Motion pass 50. Uh move on to P forty six.
Madam ClerkP forty six, Tampa Bay Times, November first, twenty twenty three.
DeniseP46 is PD247745. It's a zoning amendment, State Road 52 Industrial LLC, to change the zoning from an I-1 Light Industrial Park District and a C2 General Commercial District to a C2 General Commercial District with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that prohibits certain uses on the C2 district portion, which are included include but are not limited to standalone car. washes vehicle sales self-storage facilities as included in your agenda packet under your finding
of fact uh number two a um also on this on this item I need to read a clarification into record um that has already been provided to the clerk's office in the uh in in the form of the resolution being corrected. Number a finding of fact number eight should say the subject site has a future land use classification of comm commercial. Because that was based on a modification that was made by the Board of County Commissioners. Additionally, the comprehensive plan amendment number should
be CPASS 2305, not 2205. This comes to a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission who heard the item on November 16th of 23.
Ron OakleyChairOkay. Is anyone here to speak against this item?
DeniseI
Kathryn Starkeymight have some questions.
Ron OakleyChairOkay, we'll pull that item off. Off consent and then we'll go on to uh P forty seven.
7m2/2Ron OakleyChairForty-six. You'd already give us all that. There was a question on this item?
Kathryn StarkeyYeah. Um is the applicant here? She
Ron OakleyChairthe
Gavin Coveyapplicant is here?
Kathryn StarkeyOh, Oh, it's parking. I don't remember anyone talking to me about this before. First, uh, can someone explain what's going on here? And have did I did we meet on this one? Is this the one that's next to the Sunka the
Jack MarianoAngeline?
Kathryn StarkeyWho who was the who was this? Who?
Jack MarianoAngeline.
Kathryn StarkeyThis isn't Angeline?
Jack MarianoNo, it's across from An Rawl Street from Angeline.
Kathryn StarkeyI don't recall ever meeting on this one. I'm sorry. So
Kathryn Starkeycan you describe this? It's a it's a boat storage and a self-storage? No, those are all the things it can't be. Oh, okay, yeah. So include
Barbara Wilhiteall those things. I was like wait a
minute.
Included all your favorites to or non-favorites, as the case may be. Um we also kind of did something interesting. We took the industrial in the back. Because it's owned by uh REPA, the same the same group. We took the industrial in the back and we put a deed restriction on that that doesn't allow us to live local, even though that's nothing to do with this rezoning. And we also restricted any retail off of that industrial, even though your code allows 15%. So we all not only did we take this one when we went to COM, it's already COM, it's already commercial land use. We're just changing the zoning to C2,
but we looked at it as a property as a whole, because it now has COM and IL. And we did some things that we thought you'd be favorable with, which is one, we restricted out some of the commercial uses that aren't the county's favorites th these days, and we took the live local restriction and put it on the the commercial as well as our industrial in the back, which isn't subject to these amendments. And we took out the retail off of the ability to do fifteen percent retail off the industrial because that's allowed by land use. So we tried to do a little bit more than just uh Just
the commercial zoning. These are just out parcels right on 52 at Sun Lake Extension. And you've already changed the land use to commercial. So that's kind of the rest of the story.
Kathryn StarkeySo there's two there's two outparcels at Sun Lake and 52? On the north side. This property's on the north side. Um And they're that's what we're creating as two commercial outparcils. Well they face Sun Lake, um Or will they
Barbara Wilhiteface fifty two? I know, but are they
Kathryn Starkeygonna
Barbara Wilhitebe
Kathryn Starkeyin I don't know where Terry is?
Barbara WilhiteThey're gonna face 52. We have our Rumbus Court is our north south, but the commercial parcels will face fifty two.
Kathryn StarkeyWell that that that is one of my questions too. Is Sunlock Sun Lake Boulevard dying at fifty two? It doesn't continue to go on. Why are we not planning for it to go on?
What's the grid plan for that area?
Barbara WilhiteRumbus court's already there, so the that property's already all developed, masqueraded. Rumbus court exists today as a private road. Well that doesn't mean
Kathryn Starkeythat We shouldn't have to do that.
Mike CarballaI mean that would be part of a long range transportation plan. I mean I can't speak to that uh at this moment as to why it doesn't, but I mean the LRTP spells out what our transportation needs are. And if something like Boulevard is to terminate at 52, I don't know, Brad or
Kathryn StarkeyBut did anyone contemplate that maybe it should keep going? I mean we make I've seen where roads stopped and they should have kept going. And I I'm just curious. Sorry, Barbara's I just want to ask the question if anyone asks the question.
Unidentified speakerVoice AI don't know the area that well. Um w without too much detail here. I would have to go back and do some research for details. But my understanding is that there are some uh potential connections with the Sun Coast to the north that favor a different road going north there.
Kathryn StarkeyWhat road is the
Unidentified speakerVoice ABitcoin Road. What road would that be? One that is to the
Kathryn StarkeyNot a current road. I mean, because we already know that one's already jammed. What's the next road that's gonna help relieve everybody?
Ron OakleyChairI don't know if there's another one in that space.
Unidentified speakerVoice AWell we yeah, there's there's a jog on this one a little bit. So my my understanding is that uh the other one posed the the better alignment for the vision road to get there and also receive potential traffic from the Sun Coast.
Kathryn StarkeySo Okay, so it's not Shady Hills, there's a new road coming? Yeah,
Unidentified speakerVoice Ait's
Kathryn Starkeyit's
Unidentified speakerVoice Athe new the new one.
Kathryn StarkeyDoes anyone know what that is?
Mike CarballaWe can get back to the Commissioner on that. That's a long-range transportation planning. I don't know if I have any long-range transportation planners here to answer.
Jack MarianoMr. Chairman Mariano. Uh I hadn't I hadn't looked at what was going on to the north here. I know there's wetlands above, but I'm not sure if it directly affects this or not. But what's out there right now His A couple of nice buildings that are
At least fifteen years someone's been trying to do something with it. And th these and and they've come in, they built a couple of nice looking buildings that go right across it to go I don't know if they can make the connection through anymore anyway. I mean this is just for the front parcels that's trying to straighten out. It's a it's a good industrial park that actually fits and uh they've done a good job to I think build a good looking structure as you come in.
Ron OakleyChairOkay, Brad, do they have a better answers there? Uh I got great
Unidentified speakerVoice Aanswers. Yeah, uh And Grove maybe it's it's road A that comes road A that comes out of the Project Arthur development, that that uh business park piece there that's right at the corner, uh that is going to go north and merge into Shady Hills. Okay. That was that was the intended route after the studies.
Kathryn StarkeyThere's another road coming out of out of
Unidentified speakerVoice AAngeline?
Kathryn StarkeySo the one that's owned by Jennifer Bexley?
Unidentified speakerVoice AYes. By the Backsley family. Correct.
Kathryn StarkeyAnd that's gonna connect to Shady Hills.
Unidentified speakerVoice AThat's gonna connect up to Shady Hills and create that parallel.
Kathryn StarkeySo there is no north-south road between Shady Hills and Forty One that we consider We're not considering another route between those two.
Unidentified speakerVoice AUh, I would have to go back and see if there was something further farther to the east, but I believe it's Sun Lake and then there's a short jog on fifty two. Um Don't get you over to Shady
Ron OakleyChairHills. Just get those answers for Commissioner Starkey and make sure she understands that.
Kathryn StarkeyBut it could have connected to Valencia potentially one day.
Okay. I just think we should be always working on a grid.
Ron OakleyChairAll right, so we got a motion and a second.
Kathryn StarkeyWe did?
Ron OakleyChairYeah, we did this when we pulled it off, right? No, no. Okay.
Kathryn StarkeyWe have to take public comment too, I think.
Ron OakleyChairDo we have any public comment on this item? See and none, move approval. Got a motion? Second. One second. All those in favor say aye.
Kathryn StarkeyAye.
Ron OakleyChairAye. Motion passed five zero. Move on to I think it's forty nine P forty nine?