PDE-25-0097

Every appearance2 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 83% of 206 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Mar 20, 2025
   Planning CommissionPC12Consent agendaNo disposition in the minutes

   An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Plan Amendment (Consent) – CPAS24(14) County Line North PD– Providing For A for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The to the Future Land Use Map (Map 2- 15 And Maps (2-15 and Sheet 05) From Changing from RES-1 (Residential-1 Du/Ga) To to PD (Planned Development) On on Approximately 38.68 Acres Of of Real Property Located At On The South Side Of County Line Road Approximately 1.65 Miles West Of The Suncoast Parkway; And A Road, a Text Amendment Creating Subarea Policy FLU 7.1.85 – 7.1.85- County Line North PD; And A PD and a Map Amendment To The … Adding Subarea Map 2-9 (85) County (County Line North PD; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date. PD).

   Open this item →▶ Play from 27:56
   ▶ 27:5634m

   Jon Moody

   27:56Okay, so before we hear item PC fifteen and PC sixteen, which are Land Development Code amendments, we're going to jump to number seventeen on the agenda, which is is a presentation of the resilience Pasco project.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   28:09We we have to take up your the regular agenda. So Um I do th you need to have the hearings on PC Well we'll try to remember what we've got to

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   28:21do.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   28:22We need to hear twelve thirty three and fourteen.

   Ed Zodian

   28:41Mr. Chairman, members of the LPA, my name is Ed Zodian. I'm with Planning Services. The matter before you is

   28:50The County Line Road P D.

   28:56The project overview is it's the proposal for a compreh comprehensive excuse me plan amendment. from Res1 residential one dwelling unit per gross acre to PD Plan Development on approximately 38.68 acres. It will comprise of 300 townhomes and approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial and office space. Uh there is a sub-area policy and as you know there is also the companion uh MPUDs, which will be heard later.

   29:29Uh as you can see is in the north market area. Uh the north market area, a principal of the north market area. is that local serving commercial should be integrated with medium density residential. two, the purported or the proposed, excuse me, aligns with Excuse me. Policy flu one point eight point seven, which is a development of non residential development should be along county arterials. Uh

   30:00the proposal is consistent uh with that and also locates the employment generating uses on the front and the residential in the rear. Two it is Gracious, excuse me.

   30:15It is consistent with policy flu one point eight point one oh Uh which uh is the preservation of employment generating uses. As you can see in the context map. The site is on County Line Road. Uh it is in the vicinity of Pasco Mine. North Ridge, uh and the primary roads are On Coast Parkway and Shady Hills.

   30:45Mm-hmm. Transportation network shows that it is running on County Line Road. As you can see, the site is in blue. Uh there's also a conceptual trail along County Line Road. The T N A, which I expect you'll get into with the M PUDs, do recommend uh does recommend a l a westbound turn lane.

   31:09The existing future land use As you can see, is surrounded by the P D, which is Northridge. Uh And but for the industrial use that's next to it. It's primarily all residential in the area. The proposed future land use. Would Make this consistent with the P D next with the North Ridge which is to the west and south.

   31:34The existing don zoning shows that the M P D again surrounds it. It is A C uh with I two to the east.

   31:43There is a sub-area policy which limits it to the three hundred townhomes as well as the ten thousand square feet of resid uh excuse me, commercial.

   31:54The proposal is consistent with these following comprehensive plan amendments. And for that we respectfully recommend request that you recommend uh to the Board of County Commissioners that it's consistent to and approval. May I answer any questions? Any questions from Dyce? What's the Chris?

   Chris Williams

   32:16I just have one comment. So I know in the in the school questionnaire we provided in there, um We said that this would be zoned for Mary GL Elementary. Um but with the addition of this other parcel now it's split. So for the applicant's knowledge we will we'll figure out what the appropriate zone should be for that whole development. And so we'll look at that before any homes are built in there. So it could wind up in Shady Hills

   32:46Elementary or it might stay in Mary Giola. We'll just have to review that prior to But that won't make an uh that doesn't make any difference on I was having an issue with this particular development.

   Ed Zodian

   33:01Thank you, Sinnick.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   33:02What's the approximate residential density since this is a P D?

   Ed Zodian

   33:08It's approximately seven units uh

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   33:11gross acre. So that's a medium density. Yes, okay.

   33:16Okay.

   Charles GreyChair

   33:16Any other questions? All right, was there somebody from the audience that wanted to speak?

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   33:21Well,

   Charles GreyChair

   33:21to

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   33:21ask you a question, I

   Charles GreyChair

   33:23while we

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   33:23wanted

   Charles GreyChair

   33:23to speak.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   33:24Since all since twelve, thirteen, and fourteen are all related. I don't know if you want to open up the public have staff introduce all three items and Plit. the applicant and the objector speak to all three items. Barbara, is that okay with you? That's fine. Okay, let's do that.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   33:45Yeah.

   Chris Williams

   33:52And if I may jump in here, also this one um well I think this one's already in Shady Hills, so that wouldn't change.

   Planning and Development staff

   34:03Good afternoon, William Vermillion, Planning, Development, Economic Growth. It appears that this podium inches closer and closer to you guys each time I do this. Somebody's moving it up on me. This is uh the first of the two MPs here, the Sun City County Line Road North M Pude, PDE 25, 7849. This is a zoning amendment from AC Agricultural to MPD Master Plan Unit Development to allow for the maximum development of 156 platted townhomes and 10,000 square feet of commercial on

   34:33roughly 19 acres. This is two miles east of the Suncoast Parkway.

   34:41Here's the rough location map. Like Ed pointed out, this is in the North Market area on the border with Hernando County.

   34:49Aerial location of the first subject site.

   34:54The zoning map reflecting agricultural. The future land use indicating res one.

   35:03Here is the contextual map for this subject site. Um Just to the west there are two industrial parcels. One uh industrial heavy, one I-2. To the south is the already approved Northridge MPUD, which is roughly 750 residential dwelling units and 60,000 square feet of commercial retail along the frontage of County Line Road. and also the existing Pasco mine. It's just there to the bottom right corner.

   35:34There are three variation requests with this MPUD. The first to 9016 D11. The applicant is not proposing to provide an interconnect to the south. The Northridge MPD is already in for plating and it wasn't approved with a connection there, so the applicant didn't have an option to connect to the Northridge MPD. the second variation from nine oh five two E requires a type B landscape buffer internally between the uses uh between the non-residential and the residential. for

   36:04walkability and uh overall connectivity within the project, the applicant is not proposing to do the visual screening portion of that type B buffer. They're gonna do the rest of the type B SANS that um that visual screening to uh really enhance the connectivity internally. And the last one from 9013A. about emergency access.

   36:27This is the applicant requesting to provide a third lane in lieu of the separate emergency access condition. uh there's constraints with providing emergency access because of the spacing on County Line Road.

   36:40Here's the master plan. For this M P This one does come to you with a binding MPUD plan, not a binding concept plan. This is it here, showing the layout of those townhomes with the park space centrally located, as well as the non-residential along the frontage. There are non-residential building standards referencing orientation. uh to County Line Road and internally included in your condition packets. As well as the uh the cross connections there to

   37:10the adjacent MPD, which you'll be hearing shortly, which then takes you into the Northridge commercial area. Oh wh whatever acting as a reverse frontage to County Line Road. And with this, this comes with a recommendation of approval from Planning Development Economic Growth. I'm here for any questions.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   37:28William, I do have one question. Um I don't know that I have a problem with you changing the name to a binding M P D plan, but you're Condition of approval Still refers to it as a binding concept plan.

   Planning and Development staff

   37:43We got caught halfway. We were moving in the direction of the nomenclature of binding concept plan. Halfway through this we've been meeting with uh stakeholders and trying to fix the uh the contradictory nature of that phrase before BCC we can adjust it to binding and PD plan to be consistent with the new policy memorandum.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   38:01What exactly does that mean?

   Planning and Development staff

   38:04So there's a there's a forthcoming uh policy memorandum right now that we're working out with the stakeholders. Uh that will be available shortly. We're we're probably ninety percent of the way there with our stakeholders before we take it to the BCC uh for approval in their uh Ultimate recommendation if that meets the directive that they want us to follow.

   38:24The end The intent is to follow the LDC 402, which already lays out some of these aspects that are required of an MPD master plan. They hadn't been Um Over the years possibly they hadn't been followed in uh in a manner than which the BCC thought was appropriate. So this memo offers interpretations to each of those sections on how they should be fulfilled. Nothing new and above the existing code.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   38:50Is the applicant okay with you renaming it because What's attached in our agenda memo in our in in the agenda it still calls it a binding concept plan. So or Is the applicant okay with it being renamed?

   Planning and Development staff

   39:05We can ask her. I b I mean I'm sure it's just nomenclature, it's gonna act the same. I don't know. Well

   Barbara Wilhite

   39:14Barbara Will Hide again. We can probably call it anything we want. I'll work with staff to get the the language uh consistent with Their recommendation.

   Charles GreyChair

   39:24Okay.

   39:26Okay, thank you. Any other questions? Chris.

   Chris Williams

   39:33So so there's a lot of these kind of parcels and so are we gonna continue do you think we're gonna continue to see a bunch of townhomes in those parcels or? Any anyway. things that you see coming in the future.

   39:48We've got to do it.

   Planning and Development staff

   39:51Oh, you're going to PC fourteen? Okay. I'll answer this question while you bring it up.

   Chris Williams

   39:54Oh okay.

   Planning and Development staff

   39:55So uh like like Ed said, this is This development is what the north market area intended for this specific area. I can't speak to eastward or westward away from the north market area on whether or not this kind of development would occur but medium density with commercial frontage and connectivity is What the comprehensive plan uh contemplated.

   Chris Williams

   40:16Sure. Just wanted to see what you were looking at in the future. Thank you.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   40:23ready? William, I've got one question. This is probably more for the applicant than they can clarify, but And I don't care if they do it with this item or with 14 or however we do that, but uh what is the status of County Line Road and the fore-laning of County Line Road?

   Planning and Development staff

   40:36Sure. So I actually had a a finding of fact in my agenda memo about this. Uh myself and Mr. Patrick Dutter in working on these. We reached out to F DOT about this because we were aware of the four-laning that was going to go on. They're currently in the process of redoing the PDE. I know that they had one in the past they're not going to be able to do that. Currently re re redoing it, but what we do know preliminarily is that um Um there's gonna there's a two lane. There's a two lane portion and then the four lane portion and with the four lane portion the multi-use path is gonna be on the

   41:06south side along this uh project frontage with a sidewalk on the north side, but F dot has no timeline.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   41:14And Is there adequate right of way?

   Planning and Development staff

   41:17There is already right-of-way dedicated. I can let Barbara speak to the specifics since I could only measure it off of Mapper. But we had no ultimate build out typical to work with from F Dot. All they told us was We're we're back at the drawing board and we have no timetable.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   41:34Yeah, 'cause I and and the reason I'm asking that question, I believe there's either eighty or ninety feet of right away in this area and projects on the north side, z this one's a little different 'cause you got Hernando on the north and you got Pasco on the south. Projects right across the street on the Hernando side are asking for for forty feet of right away. I is is Pasco gonna be short on our side? or not. That's why I was asking the question. I don't know, maybe when

   Planning and Development staff

   41:56they come up, maybe the applicant can Can you can you bring up mapper? Yep. There there is right away existing along the frontage and Liam can bring that up and Barbara if you know exactly how much it is.

   Barbara Wilhite

   42:14What I can add to the conversation is that the current PDE has the um right-way coming off the Hernando side. That's probably why you're seeing that. Okay. And all the communications with F D OT regarding this, um, they have not stated that anything will come off the South Side. So That's our best information. There was a a memorandum understanding entered into between Hernando County and the Pasco County that took forever and they finally joined hands and got that done. The project is on the

   42:44MPO priority list and F D OT is now engaged. uh to move the project forward. So That's what I know about it. Okay. Thank you. Very good.

   Charles GreyChair

   42:56All right.

   43:01Okay, William. I think we're good.

   Planning and Development staff

   43:03Perfect.

   Charles GreyChair

   43:05Are you doing the fourteen also?

   Planning and Development staff

   43:07I was lucky enough to have both of these, yes sir.

   43:12This is the neighboring MPD, Suncoast Village MPD, PD 257820. Very similar to what you just heard, Sans the commercial This is 144 platted townhomes on 19.3 acres, two miles east of the Sun Coast, a rezoning from AC agricultural to MPD, Master Plan Unit Development. Same location, next door neighbor.

   43:38the zoning reflecting agricultural and the future land use. as well. Res one. The same exact concept map, just the subject site is flipped now to the U uh the westerly parcels there, Butting Northridge.

   43:55One variation request, it's the same as the previous. The applicant wasn't able to provide an interconnect to the south because of the uh the platted North Ridge uh subdivision that's happening currently.

   44:06the master plan for this project. And this is the the same conversation that we're gonna have on this one. The binding M Pud Plan. Originally this project mirrored The other project with commercial frontage However, uh the applicant was kind enough to work with Both of their applicants as well as PDE staff to provide a comprehensive planning strategy for these two as well as the area so that commercial Uh area went away in lieu of larger park space because of the amount

   44:37of commercial being provided just on the frontage and north ridges and a as well as the ten thousand square feet now being provided. To the east. So we have a nice part frontage uh on this uh this reverse frontage road here and uh That's that's the only difference in terms of the MPD binding plan. And this comes as well with a recommendation of approval with conditions from Planning Development Economic Growth.

   Christopher Poole

   45:00Okay, any other questions? So on PC thirteen, looking back at the concept plan for that, are you're showing interconnect to the what would that be to the east to the industrial? Property.

   Planning and Development staff

   45:13It it'll be a stub out in case um yeah it's a wood chipping facility currently, so there is the possibility that it is redeveloped. It's not a heavy use.

   Christopher Poole

   45:22Ten four.

   Charles GreyChair

   45:24Okay.

   45:26Soundless Harbor. Thank you, William. Thank you, sir.

   Barbara Wilhite

   45:32Barbara Wilhite again. I have the pleasure of representing both of these projects as well as the North Ridge project.

   45:40Can we do the Sun City um PowerPoint? I'm gonna try to not duplicate myself, even though they're two separate projects. I do want to tell you while we're bringing that up, what's going on in this area. So previously, and to Mr. Williams' question, what's going on in this area? So for a long time there was an interlocal agreement between Hernando County and Pasco County for sewer. never used and Hernando decided they didn't want to provide sewer.

   46:11The project, the Northridge project, which is being developed by REPA, which are both developers and site contractors, they worked with the county to bring water and sewer to this area. So the sewer is currently located at Shady Hills Elementary on Shady Hills Road. That extension is thirty-one thousand eight hundred linear feet. The water is currently on County Line Road, but to the west. That extension is 10,300

   46:42linear feet. So the county has made a decision that they no longer wanted to rely upon Hernando County, which ultimately all that did was allow growth on the Hernando County side because This the county didn't get any sewer on on this side. So the Board of County Commissioners partnered with REPA to get utilities to this area. So we're seeing that natural progression of growth. And What staff wanted to do, because both these projects presented themselves at the same similar

   47:12time, and Northridge was also i in play at the similar time, they wanted to see these three projects coordinated. So all three of these projects have binding whatever kind of plans you want to call them. Binding blank plans. So that we could have a coordination and the way I look at it is if you if these this project came as one, this is how you'd want to see it done. We really did a great job working between the projects and having them coordinate, even though it slow it slowed them down, that we could bring forward a coordinated plan and say this

   47:43is how this is gonna function. So that's a little bit of background while Liam was getting this ready for me.

   47:52That is really hard to see. So again, this is what's going on in the area. There's a lot of growth on the north side, on the Hernando side. Not so much on the south side because of the situation until recently. And I and I would tell you that Reap is under construction, that sewer line and water line has been under construction since um January. So this is not something that we is on paper, it's actually happening. There's not a lot. My teams tell me there's not a lot of townhomes in this area, and that's why they are adding townhomes for their project here, their projects.

   48:23This is the Sun City. Staff's gone over that. You can see the commercial portion, 10,000 square feet, the residential portion, which are townhomes. Um, and there's the layout is very purposeful to try to maximize the environment as you go west. because ultimately at Northridge there's fourteen acres of commercial. and that sits on um and that's 60,000 square feet. So we really wanted to see these three projects as you move between the projects and

   48:53really encourage people to move between the projects and not drive, but they obviously can drive. The other thing I want to point out is that North Ridge is supposed is going to have a traffic light. They'll eventually trigger a traffic light. So making sure that there's vehicular connectivity so folks can get to a traffic light, as well as a pleasant Pike bike pedagogy. track when if you want to go over to the commercial. So that's what we were trying to achieve between the three projects. As you can see the three projects here lined up side by side.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   49:24So Barbara, I'm since you have them lined up side by side I have a question. So I know you're not connecting to Northridge to the south. But would there eventually be a connection To the West.

   Barbara Wilhite

   49:39So what you see here is it's kind of hard to see just the way it's shaded, but there's there is a reverse frontage road, a parallel road that goes between all three of these projects. So the connection will be via this parallel road.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   49:58This parallel road. that's right here.

   Barbara Wilhite

   50:04Yes.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   50:05Okay.

   Barbara Wilhite

   50:05Correct. Correct.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   50:06And that connection will eventually connect to North there's north south road, whatever that's called.

   Barbara Wilhite

   50:11Both of theirs, yes. So yeah, ultimately there'll be that kind of the connectivity between all of these parcels. It just doesn't happen to the south. It happens through this boulevard effect that we put together between the three projects.

   50:32And if you could just quickly put up the Sun Coast Village, you gotta give them both their time.

   50:39As they should be.

   50:42I would say I would let you know that these three projects together, not considering they're commercial, because we don't know exactly what that build out will be, but they are gonna generate seven point eight million dollars of mobility fees. So we go from an area that didn't have water and sewer to an area that's now generating tax dollars and mobility fees.

   51:14D is it the other one for Sunka's Village? Sorry, Liam. Can't believe Liam's leaving us.

   51:24Kind of So again, this project, what we're showing here is um what's going on. This this was the Suncoast Village project that put this together, what's going on in context around. This project is both these projects are surrounded by Northridge on the south.

   51:48Again, this is a representation of the projects put together. And you can see it a little bit better here, David, how the connectivity goes through the three projects. And this is Suncoast Village's plan. And I think it was alluded to, this project came in with a commercial component as well as a residential component. And when we put 'em together, just didn't seem like having So much commercial was

   52:19as much of a benefit to these three projects coordinating as having more green space and open space so that and these roads are are are private but gonna be open, um so that people can go but back and forth through the projects and so this client was willing to give up their commercial and and put it into open space, green space, which is pretty unusual as well. So

   52:45That is the history of these projects. I'm not sure what the comment will be, so um but I wanted to make sure you had a good idea of you know, what we've done here. So thank you.

   Charles GreyChair

   52:55Thank you, Margaret. I appreciate it. All right, and I think there was someone who wanted to speak. And forward?

   53:07You state your name and address and you've been sworn?

   Pastor Jim

   53:10I was not sworn. That was the first thing I was gonna say. I thought I was gonna catch you.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   53:16Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give the truth of love be God?

   Pastor Jim

   53:19I

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   53:19do.

   Pastor Jim

   53:20Thank you. Pastor John Kerouak, Shady Hills Mission Chapel, [address removed]. And the things that I I mean, and I'm happy however you want to work this, you want me to go sit down and come back up or whatever. I mean it seems like these are all together and

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   53:39You can speak to all three. We opened up the public hearing for all three of them.

   Pastor Jim

   53:42Excellent. Thank you. Um, so some of the current concerns that I had as I was reading through um the things and and because I have over the last three years um seen where there is a hope for something to happen. Kind of, you know, Shady Hills Road being expanded being one of my big priorities for our community. But you know, to see that um transportation needs 2045 not

   54:12having any timeline from F Dot is significantly concerning to me. Additionally, most recently with the um Increase of flow of traffic, not just in Pasco, as those before me have mentioned, that you know, there's a lot going on in the north side. Most of those are single family developments, and I did hear the townhome comments, so maybe that's something that I haven't seen yet. I I don't know. Um But

   54:43um most importantly, um there are things that I saw such th as I went through the memos and everything that was written up. You know, the bus stop on County Line Road is a big concern. We've had several incidents over the last, just even the last several weeks where we've had individuals that have been trying to cross, that have been unfortunately, you know, killed as

   55:13a result of trying to cross that road. It's increasing, it's two-lane. You know, there are a lot of concerns. I'm not opposed, again, I'll say it, and I just would like to know whether or not any affordable housing or if this is a project that's considered or will be working towards a product that is affordable housing as a significant concern of mine. especially with regards to the community. Additionally,

   55:44I did want to point out, I noticed that the sheriff did respond, the Sheriff's Office back in July of last year, just not having enough resources, needing additional tax dollars, specifically to reiterate to reiterate the Pasco Sheriff's Office's Not anti-growth, but any rezoning, especially rezoning from commercial or ag to residential, must be weighed with the opportunity lost for commercial or ag development and the impact

   56:15on our community through crime and other impacts, such as those being. you know, unfortunately meeting their demise, trying to cross the road and I think of the kids that are gonna have to wait and And we're still waiting for, you know proper bus stops and things like that in Shady Hills Road. So um at any rate I just you know these are the major concerns. We're sixty third out of sixty seven. I mean the sheriff has responded uh to the cl comp Plan

   56:45amend comp Plan Plan amendment. So you know these are my concerns. These are the concerns of Shady Hills. It does impact Shady Hills. the roads, whether or not they were originally developed in a way that can accommodate the the trucks and all that's happening. um and all the three way that will probably come down Shady Hills Road. So I know I'm over my time.

   Charles GreyChair

   57:11Okay, thank you.

   Pastor Jim

   57:12Appreciate it. Any

   Charles GreyChair

   57:13questions?

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   57:14I do have a question for staff. Thank you very much. Um Do we know why? The sheriff commented on the comp plan. But then issued no comments on the two rezoning? I mean they're effectively the same

   57:34approvals. I I'm just curious as to why He raised these concerns with the comp plan but then didn't raise similar concerns with the rezoning.

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   57:43Uh Nictoria Hospitos playing development economic growth. I do I can't speak specifically for the Sheriff's Office. I don't know the e the exact answer, but my guess is that they were commenting on the density question through the comp plan.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   57:57Yeah, I mean my only comment is if you if staff knows that that's what the sheriff's thought is In the rezoning agenda memos you probably should say However, he did comment on the Complant the related compliant amendment. I mean, 'cause it Okay. It looks odd when you say the Sheriff's Office had no comments to the rezoning If in fact We know we had a concern that was

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   58:21Yeah.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   58:21Reads in the associated plan amendment.

   Unidentified speakerVoice D

   58:23We can make that added. It's probably moving as a package to the system, so but we can be redundant in each of those memos. Okay.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   58:32All right, thank you, Terry. Anything else?

   58:38I appreciate the connectivity between All three M P U D's. Just mechanically. How does one assure That the east west alignment of that interconnection Happens at the same depth back from the right of way.

   59:03So it in other words They're not gonna come in for site plan approval with one comprehensive site plan will end up being three different Development plan approvals. So how do they how do you assure That that's a good idea. road gets aligned in the same place.

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   59:22So there is a standard MPD condition. That requires them to coordinate. I think it's condition

   59:30Nineteen in the Hmm

   59:36I don't remember the numbers on each of them, but they all they all have a coordination requirement. that they have to follow.

   Barbara Wilhite

   59:44And Barbara Willhead, I would add, Northridge is ahead, and so Northridge ultimately set the the line. And then these projects when you see those plans, they plan to the to North Ridge's line, 'cause North Ridge is ahead. Okay. So that's just interesting how it's it's played out, but yeah, they set to the Northridge line. Got it.

   Charles GreyChair

   1:00:07All right. Anything else? Nobody's on a WebEx, you said.

   Jon Moody

   1:00:14That is correct, Mr. Chairman

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   1:00:15M okay, thank you. Barbara, did you want to offer any additional rebuttal?

   Charles GreyChair

   1:00:23So

   Chris Williams

   1:00:23if

   Charles GreyChair

   1:00:23if not, if no more than I'm going to do,

   Chris Williams

   1:00:24I'm

   1:00:24not sure.

   1:00:25I just want to thank Barbara for shepherding those three together. That's great. Appreciate that.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:00:33Okay.

   Charles GreyChair

   1:00:34So do we have a motion?

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:00:37Do it one at a time. Well yeah,

   Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

   1:00:38you should do them one at a time. I d my only thing I'm gonna caution staff on is if you're gonna change the name of this binding whatever plan to something midstream. Please make sure you're catching it at every location because it's that term binding concept plan is used in many documents. So I'm not a big fan of you changing things midstream because that's how things get missed. But if you insist on doing that, Over my objection, um, you better make sure you're catching it

   1:01:08in every spot.

   1:01:11So yeah. Thank you.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:01:19I'll make a motion to approve PC twelve.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:01:21So you need to do oh.

   Charles GreyChair

   1:01:28yeah.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:01:29Jamie.

   Charles GreyChair

   1:01:30Any further discussion on the uh number uh number twelve?

   1:01:36If not, all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like signs? Okay. Do I have a motion on number 13, PC 13?

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:01:47So moved. With David's warning.

   1:01:54And

   Charles GreyChair

   1:01:54the sheriff's office. Stern warning. That's right. Okay. So n everybody's afraid to second it's a second. A second. Okay. All in favor? Signify by saying aye. Aye. And PC fourteen.

   Unidentified speakerVoice C

   1:02:09Motion to approve PC fourteen.

   Charles GreyChair

   1:02:11Second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Like signed? Hey, just curious.

2. 2Apr 22, 2025
   Board of County CommissionersP49Public hearingAdopted

   Approved minutes

   Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 41:10
   ▶ 41:102m1/2

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   41:10P forty-nine was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times March 5th, 2025, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

   Ron Oakley

   41:18Item P49 is PDE 250097. This is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two-fifteen and sheet zero five. From Res One residential one dwelling unit per gross acre to PD plan development, and approximately 38.68 acres of real property located at the south side. Of County Line Road, approximately 1.65 miles west of the Sun Coast Parkway. Add a text amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.85,

   41:49County Line North P D. Add a map amendment to the future land use map, map two-nine, adding sub-area map two-nine eighty-five, County Line North P D. and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency. Providing for repealer serverability at an effective date is comes to you with a recommendation to approve the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and adopt the ordinance by roll call vote. And there's a presentation if desired.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   42:17Uh board members, does anyone um require a presentation?

   invocation speaker

   42:21So

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   42:23Okay. Um is there anyone here to speak against this item?

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   42:28It's either it's an ordinance, it's either way. But

   Ron Oakley

   42:31yeah, then speak.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   42:32Oh, for or against.

   Ron Oakley

   42:36Seeing no one approved vote approval. Second.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   42:40Roll call vote. District One, Commissioner Oakley. Aye. District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District four, Commissioner Yeager. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District three, Chairman Starkey. Aye.

   ▶ 1:12:314m2/2

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   1:12:31Madam Clerk before you get to P fifty two, um there has been some chatter online about someone who had been signed up on WebEx for item forty nine. Um it does indicate that she was she was Wanted to speak. on a rezoning change, which is where you are now. So I need some clarification about what Ms. Julian really wanted to speak to.

   1:13:02From home. Is she online? Yeah, she is. She's online.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:08I saw her name on a paper, but did you have that? It just says zoning change, which

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:15was

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:15not P4D. It's

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:16not specified here what Kathy.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:24I

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:24don't

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:24know what that is.

   Unidentified speakerVoice F

   1:13:29I made a request on the infectious.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:37How cheap?

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   1:13:40Secret ways?

   1:13:46There and

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:13:48Ms. Julian, are you online yet?

   1:13:56Gentleman, does it look like her microphone is muted?

   Seth WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

   1:13:59Yes.

   Barbara Wilhite

   1:14:00And we can't unmute it.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:14:02Can you unmute your microphone please?

   Pastor Troy Peterson

   1:14:12I mean

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:14:13She just left? Okay. She is no longer online.

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   1:14:18Okay.

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:14:23Okay, um so where was I? P Madam Chairman, would you like me

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   1:14:27to

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:14:27read the rezoning? Yes, I will. Yes, as we get into our rezoning

   Unidentified speakerVoice E

   1:14:31agenda. There are two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there is no opposition, the application will be considered by the board without further presentation. If staff or planning commission has recommended denial or if there is opposition to the application, The applicant will be given five minutes for presentation. The opposition will be given three minutes for each individual or five minutes for a group representative. And the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal.

   1:15:02Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition of the rezoning, may at this time request the petition be pulled from the consent agenda, in which case that application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise, all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to any petition, please give your name and address and whether or not you've been sworn for the record, These are quasi judicial public

   1:15:32hearing. The law in Florida is that mere public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action. Please limit your comments to those criteria found within the Board's land development code for rezoning. Madam Clerk, would you like to square those in who wish to speak?

   Kathryn StarkeyChair

   1:15:49Yes, sir. So if you plan to speak to any of the remaining items on the public hearing agenda, please stand and raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth, so help you God. Thank you. Okay, let's go.

   1:16:11Uh yes.