Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PDE-25-7855

Published agenda

2 appearances between Feb 20, 2025 and Mar 25, 2025, at 2 boards.

OutcomeApproved by the Board of County Commissioners on Mar 25, 2025
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Item P39.

Official title

Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Gustavo A and Angela Trejos/Land O' Lakes Retail – Change in Zoning from an A-R Agricultural-Residential District to a C-2 General Commercial District – South Central Pasco County – North Side of State Road 54 and Approximately 1,020 Feet West of Wilson Road – Containing Approximately 1.93 Acres

On a calendar

Feb 20, 2025 → Mar 25, 2025 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance2 of 2 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 76% of 38 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

  1. 1
    Planning CommissionPC4Consent agendaNo disposition in the minutes

    Zoning Amendment (Consent) – … A and Angela Trejos/Land O' O Lakes Retail – Change in Zoning from an a A-R Agricultural-Residential District to … Road – Containing Approximately 1.93 1.59 Acres

    Open this item →
    4m
    Liam Devine

    Anybody here to object? Okay. Yeah. PC4, PDE 25-7855. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Gustavo A and Angelina Trejo slash Land O' Lakes Retail. It's a change in zoning from AR Agricultural Residential District to C2 General Commercial District. It's on the north side of State Road 54, approximately 1,020 feet west. of Wilson Road containing approximately 1.59 acres. The recommendation

    is to uh um make a recommendation for approval with the voluntary deed restrictions as provided in your agenda packet.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Okay,

    Liam Devine

    and the applicant present.

    Charles GreyChair

    Anyone here to object?

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Liam, I got one question on that one. Is the Looks like this is only for rezoning of a part of the parcel, correct?

    Liam Devine

    1.59 acres. I believe that is the whole parcel. It's right up on the easement.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    The reason I'm asking the question is there's a survey included as an attachment to the agenda. The whole parcel is seven point three five acres. Five point four two acres of that is wetlands. If you go down to the background section, it says one point nine three acres. So I'm assuming the one point nine three is correct, but I just wanted clarification.

    Liam Devine

    Sorry, yes, you are correct. There is um and maybe your zoning visuals will actually show it. Um it is only a partial of the it's just the frontage on State Road 54. The back half is actually conservation lands because it is a wetland. Um I believe they just recently went. through and somebody can correct me if I'm wrong through a comprehensive plan amendment to do so.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    David, is it clear enough the way it's written because there's this conflict in the acreage. I just I just wanted to clarify, I didn't want to get stuck later.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    Um I believe so. I mean is is the applicant here they can speak to the conflict

    Charles GreyChair

    The applicant

    Connected City

    present.

    Jaimie GirardiVice Chair

    Mm mm mm.

    Charles GreyChair

    He raised his hand in the back. Can you come forward please for a second?

    Liam Devine

    But just for the record, we are just rezoning the front portion one place.

    Charles GreyChair

    Okay.

    Good

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    afternoon.

    Okay.

    Charles GreyChair

    And uh so do you can you give us the exact uh Uh size of the property.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    Um the uh as as uh it was described earlier, uh the land encompasses uh upland closer to fifty four and wetland in the back. So I believe the front portion that's upland is one point five nine acres.

    Charles GreyChair

    And what and and where did you com where did you see one point nine one?

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    One point nine three is in the background. And I believe if you do the math, I think the one point nine three is correct. Because the survey that's included as exhibit A, the legal description,

    Liam Devine

    So I believe there might be some discrepancies from the background write up petition. That's the general abbreviation. It says 1.93. And then in the subject line it says 1.59. I'm not really sure where that discrepancy is coming from. And then it also states in finding a fact number one, I won't read it, but I'll read the sentence the remainder acreage is 5.53. So I believe there might be some. confusion in the acreage, but we will double check the actual survey that will be just the front portion that is

    not part of the conservation and make those corrections.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    Okay. Yeah, I have no opposition. I just wanted to point out I just asked the question and get clarification for the applicant. Thank you.

    Charles GreyChair

    Thank you, sir.

    Okay, and there is there anybody here to object? Yeah. Okay.

    Liam Devine

    So that was PC four. Moving on to PC five, I believe we have people registered to speak on that item, so that item will be pulled. Okay. Um we also for PC six which is the companion rezoning to that, we have individuals registered to speak on that one so that item will be pulled as well. PC7, you'll be sitting as the local planning agency. It's a comprehensive uh it's PC7 PDE 25-0070. It's a comprehensive plan amendment. Um CPA 2402

  2. 2
    Board of County CommissionersP39Public hearingApproved
    Approved minutes

    Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Item P39.

    Open this item →
    1m
    Jack MarianoVice Chair

    And on the consent agenda, P thirty-nine, Madam Clerk.

    Kathryn StarkeyChair

    Item P thirty nine was published in the Tampe Times on February 5th, 2025, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

    Ron Oakley

    Item P thirty nine is PD twenty five seven eight five five. This is a zoning amendment in the name of Gustavo A and Angela Treos slash Land O' Lakes Retail, which is a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential district to a C two general commercial district in the South Central Pasco County. on the north side of State Road 54 and approximately 1,020 feet west of Wilson Road, containing approximately 1.93 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation to adopt the zoning amendment and to authorize the Chairman to execute

    one original of the resolution.

    Jack MarianoVice Chair

    Thank you. Is there anyone here to speak against this item?

    Kathryn StarkeyChair

    I have no one signed up and no one on WebEx for this item.

    Jack MarianoVice Chair

    Then we'll leave it on consent. Move approval.

    I have a motion of second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. I'll go to item P forty.