Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PDE-26-0021

Published agenda

Heard once, at the Board of County Commissioners on Dec 9, 2025.

OutcomeAdopted by the Board of County Commissioners on Dec 9, 2025
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

Official title

An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2- 15 And Sheet 18) From RES-6 (Residential 6- Du/Ga) To IL (Industrial-Light) On Approximately 1.80 Acres Of Real Property Located At The Southeast Corner Of The Intersection Of Alderman Lane And Rowan Road; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.

Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 97% of 35 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

  1. 1
    Board of County CommissionersP81Public hearingAdopted
    Approved minutes

    Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.

    Open this item →
    4m
    MarianoVice Chair

    Aye. Item P eighty one.

    Madam Clerk

    P eighty one, proof of publication, Tampa Bay Times, November 19, 2025, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

    Oakley

    Item P eighty one is PDE 260021. This is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, Map 2-15, and Sheet 18 from Res 6, residential 6 dwelling units per gross acre, to IL, Industrial Light, on approximately 1.8 acres of real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Alderman Lane and Rhode. And providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer serverability, and an effective

    date. This comes to you with the recommendation to accept public comment and adopt the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and ordinance by roll call vote.

    MarianoVice Chair

    Okay. Would the board like a presentation? Oh, Mr.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    Batman. No, thank you, Chair. Just a question. Terry, so is this property this one point eight acres, is this property associated with uh Uh the asphalt solutions company, because if it's tied into a larger piece of property Then when you look at adding the Live Local Act provision on the one point eight, if it's gonna expand to If we could have a little bit of a little bit of a the zoning on the property to the south, if it's all going to tie in together

    Oakley

    That's what I'm trying to do. I I I don't think it is, but we'll let the applicant speak to it.

    Barbara Wilhite

    Good afternoon again. Barbara Wilhite, 8627 Grand Boulevard for the applicant. The applicant, when I first started on this journey, was the Deeb family and now it's the Kealty family. Um and this is only parcel that they own. They don't have any relationship with any of the parcels around them.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    My map are stuck, but what's the zoning to the property directly to the south? Hollywood it's called uh

    C2?

    Barbara Wilhite

    The south is uh C one and C two.

    StarkeyChair

    What about the north?

    Barbara Wilhite

    The north is AR.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    Yeah.

    Barbara Wilhite

    But

    StarkeyChair

    it's fun very

    Barbara Wilhite

    funky.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    Due to the two bottom stuff. The zoning of the two bottom parcels, even though it's existing, would you have going to be okay with putting the Liploc provision on the one point eight acres? in case we have something that comes in in the future to this house and they try to marry The parcels?

    Barbara Wilhite

    The South already has a building on it, Commissioner.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    I'm aware of that. Okay. But if an investor comes in and purchases that property to the south and they prop purchase this vacant land to the north, Marry the two together and they put a li combine it to do a live local. I'm concerned that there's a potential that they could tie them together and put a live local B. I'm not saying they will, I'm just being cautious. Or it's up to the flavor of the board. If it's not worth it then we just

    Barbara Wilhite

    Well this MPUD has the Lib Local condition on it. It's in the zoning. It's in the M P D zoning. Um so we have m made provision for this p parcel and that's really all we can control today is this parcel.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    Okay. Okay, well that's on there. I'm okay. Okay.

    Barbara Wilhite

    Right. So if they did purchase this one, they this parcel would be subject to Lib Local, which would foil any plans that are That's what I'm

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    trying to do. Spoil the plans. It would foil their plans. Great terminology. Thank you, Ms. Wellhatt and your Christmas red.

    Um can

    StarkeyChair

    I ask a question? Yeah, did you say that that parcel and I see the address here is that one two Three five six Moss Lake Loop is a business, not a house. To the south of this partial?

    Barbara Wilhite

    To the south as a business, yes.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    Yeah. To the south as a business.

    Unidentified speaker

    Okay.

    WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

    I'll

    MarianoVice Chair

    move a or you need public comment. Yes, okay. Uh Applicant, do you want to say anymore? Okay. Anyone here from the public like to speak to this item?

    Back to the board, view pro second. Call the roll, please.

    Madam Clerk

    District 1, Commissioner Oakley.

    MarianoVice Chair

    Aye.

    Madam Clerk

    District 2, Commissioner Weightman. District 3, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District 4, Commissioner Yeager. Aye. District 5, Chairman Mariano.