PDE-26-7858

Every appearance3 of 6 are in a recording

Each appearance carries the official title above. Where the county’s wording changed, the change is marked: added and removed. Steps with no marks were worded identically.

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 94% of 64 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 3 of the 6 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

1. 1Feb 5, 2026
   Planning CommissionPC9Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Zoning Amendment (Continuance) (Consent) – SAV Property Holdings, … Containing Approximately 10.40 Acres

   Open this item →No recording
2. 2Mar 5, 2026
   Planning CommissionP9Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Zoning Amendment (Continuance) (Regular) – SAV Property Holdings, … - Containing Approximately 10.40 Acres Acres.

   Open this item →No recording
3. 3Mar 10, 2026
   Board of County CommissionersP52Public hearingContinued

   Approved minutes

   Approved to continue to the April 7, 2026 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 11:52
   ▶ 11:521m

   MarianoChair

   11:52Thank you. Today we have three public hearing items on the agenda that are continuance as we'll start with P 52. Mr. Clerk will notice.

   Starkey

   12:01B-52, we have proof publication in the January 21st, 2026 edition of the Tampa Bay Times, supplemented by certified mailings, affidavit of certified mailings and site postings. Okay.

   Amy Heiler

   12:13P52 is a zoning amendment in the name of SAV Property Holdings LLC, New Horizons MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. It's a rezoning request from an R2 low density residential district. to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for the development of thirty-one single family detached units and associated infrastructure. This comes with you with a recommendation to continue the item to April seventh, twenty twenty six at one thirty in Dade City.

   MarianoChair

   12:41May have a motion to continue to P52. Move. With an uptake button. No continuo sabotaged. Have a motion. Do I have a second? I second. Okay. All in favor say aye. Aye.

4. 4Apr 7, 2026
   GeneralP50Public hearingContinued

   Approved minutes

   Approved to continue to the May 5, 2026 Board of County Commissioners meeting at 1:30 p.m. in Dade City with Commissioner Weightman absent from the vote.

   Open this item →No recording
5. 5Apr 9, 2026
   Planning CommissionP9Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes

   Zoning Amendment (Continuance) (Regular) – SAV Property Holdings, … - Containing Approximately 10.40 Acres Acres.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 21:39
   ▶ 21:399m

   Barbara

   21:39right. You're gonna do P9. Item P nine is PDE twenty six dash seventy eight fifty eight, the zoning amendment in the name of SAV property holdings, LLC, New Horizons, M P D Master Planning Unit Development, to be presented by staff.

   GreyChair

   22:04I'm staff. You're staff. Welcome back. I I'm sorry, I'm not following you today for some reason. You're supposed to put a different hat on. Yeah, speak slower, plainer, something. I don't know. I didn't have any earring aids, so

   22:19Good afternoon, Planning

   Barbara

   22:20Commission members. This is the New Horizons M P Okay.

   22:26Here's a rough location within the county.

   22:30The proposal is a rezoning request from an R two low density residential district to an MPD master planning unit development for the maximum development of thirty-one single family homes. The project is located within the South Market area, abutting south of the Wells Road extension, approximately six hundred and seventy-five feet west of the Wells Road and Boyette Road intersection.

   22:55Here's our site location. This is a relatively unimproved portion of Wells.

   23:03Zoning map. The subject site was rezoned to R2 low density residential in the early 2000s with a maximum density of 20 units. An ordinary R2 district would allow 46 homes on 10 acres. So the pre petition today. Is eleven additional homes less than the R2 maximum, but more than they could pursue at the current time.

   23:30The future land use designation of this site is residential three, the maximum entitlement being thirty-one units by three units per acre, ten point three three acres required of the site.

   23:47It's a context map. The subject site is less than one mile south of the Wesley Chapel District Park, and approximately a quarter. Quarter mile south of the Wesley Chapel Elementary School and High School.

   24:03Here's our MPUD master plan. Although faint, there is a ten-foot right-of-way, conveyance along the project frontage and the vehicular access points. The access ingress-egress of the project will be on Wells Road and then Stubbs east and west for potential redevelopment of the neighboring properties.

   24:25This is exhibit one, the binding concept plan. This also visually demonstrates the improvement to Wells Road. The roadway typical will be shown later in this presentation. The residential areas are in yellow and the dark green on the south end. Is there open space requirement?

   24:45Exhibit two, this is a non-binding concept plan to visually demonstrate the thirty-one homes. All thirty-one homes shall have a minimum width of fifty-five feet the lot that is.

   25:00Now, here's the proposed 60-foot roadway typical to improve this segment of Wells Road from Boyette to the project access. There's an existing 50-feet of county-owned right-of-way, to which the applicant proposes to develop as part of this project without reimbursement via mobility fee credits.

   25:23Excuse me. The only portion left for future development of this typical would be a second ten foot multi-use path. The ten foot multi-use path to be developed as part of this project will go on the north end of that right-of-way. The developer has conveyed the second subject. Southern 10 feet via right-of-way, which would require right-of-way conveyance of neighbors to ultimately build out Taboyat Road.

   25:58Uh Patty, could you move to the next slide? This thing's frozen.

   26:14There are two variation requests as part of this project, the first being from LDC section 901.6, 0.11, and this is to not provide a vehicular connection south of the project boundary. That's given the existing residences immediately south of the project. Project in addition to New Dutch lanes inability to support additional vehicular trips. The second variation request is from LDC section 901.2.I.

   26:45This is a reduction of the corridor width for Wells Road. This was originally contemplated at 80 feet. However, the typical, the 60-foot typical would provide sufficient vehicular and pedestrian. facility of the proposed density and existing density on this segment of Wells Road.

   27:07That PD recommends approval to the Board of County Commissioners of the zoning amendment request with conditions. I'm here if you have questions.

   Moody

   27:15Just a quick one. You said the concept plan was non binding?

   Barbara

   27:21The concept plan is binding. The second one here is a non-binding illustration. The only difference being a visual demonstration of the thirty-one homes, whereas the binding concept plan denotes those areas as residential. Okay.

   Moody

   27:37I got it.

   GreyChair

   27:42Okay. Like other questions. Applicant present.

   Barbara Wilhite

   27:57Thank you. Barbara Woolhite, 6327, Grand Boulevard, Newport Rechie, for the applicant. We were here a couple months ago. Um I was just looking to see if anybody signed up here because we just did a presentation, but um we were here a couple months ago and we had a bunch of neighbors. that were interested in this project. Um, they were all of our neighbors to the east, the Boyette family, member members of the Boyette family. Um they were very interested in the Wells Road and how that was going to be constructed. They have a business of um a

   28:30Mm s I describe their business. They sell fruits and vegetables, they have food trucks, kind of a community gathering area. People come have coffee, they eat. So they wanted to make sure that how Wells Road functioned. um in the after, after it was improved. would also work for their business. So we went out. One afternoon, drug your county engineer out with us and went out in sight and met with them And we happy to say we worked out um everything. I worked out a solution for everyone. Something works for the developer, the county,

   29:00and that adjacent property owner. So perhaps that's why nobody signed up. Maybe there was somebody here to speak, I don't know. Um but uh that's why you've seen this on your agenda a couple months ago and it took us a little bit to get that done and we're back today and we hope we have your support. Thank you.

   GreyChair

   29:13Okay, thank you, Marv. Any questions from up here?

   29:19Okay, is there anyone here to speak on this topic?

   29:26Looks like there isn't.

   29:29So any comments from up here? Any emotions?

   Connected City

   29:34Yeah.

   29:37Except to be curious why it may not have been on the consent agenda. Mm-hmm. Move to approve item P

   GreyChair

   29:45nine.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   29:46Second.

   GreyChair

   29:47We have a motion, we have a second, any further discussion of P nine. If not all in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign? Okay. Okay. Very good. Thank you.

   30:06Next.

   Barbara

   30:07Agenda item P ten you'll be sitting as the local planning agency for this is PDE twenty six.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   30:17Yeah, let's why aren't we doing PC? Say that again.

   GreyChair

   30:28Uh, I don't know. Okay.

   30:36Okay, back to PC eight.

6. 6May 5, 2026
   Board of County CommissionersP42Public hearingApproved

   Zoning Amendment (Continuance) (Consent) – SAV Property Holdings, … Containing Approximately 10.40 Acres

   Approved minutes

   Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Items P42 and P43.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 22:53
   ▶ 22:534m

   MarianoChair

   22:53And now we're going to public hearing, Mr. County Attorney.

   Unidentified speakerVoice B

   22:56There's two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. The staff will present each application to the board county commissioners. If the staff of the planning commission has recommended approval, there's no opposition. The application will be considered by the board without further presentation. Any individual disagreeing with the staff upon a commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition in the rezoning may at this time request that the petition be pulled from the consent agenda, in which case that application will be beheard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. If you wish to speak

   23:26to any petition, please give your name and address whether or not you've been sworn for the record.

   MarianoChair

   23:31Okay. And would I just swear on?

   Starkey

   23:33Yes, if you are here to speak on any of the uh next items, please stand and raise your right hands.

   23:43Okay. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth, so help you God. Thank you.

   MarianoChair

   23:51Okay, item P forty-two, do you have proof?

   Starkey

   23:53Yes. Item P forty-two was published in the Tampa Bay Times on January 21st, 2026, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings. The item was continued from the March 10th, 2026 BCC meeting, where it was continued to the April 7th, 2026 BCC meeting, where it was continued to today. Thank you.

   Oakley

   24:13Thank you, Mr. Chairman Carlos Pitos, Playing Development Economic Growth. This is item P forty two, which is PDE twenty-six seven eight five eight. This is a zoning amendment in the name of SAV property holdings LLC, New Horizons MPUD Master Plan Unit Development. It's a rezoning request from an R2 Low Density Residential District. Between MPUD Master Plan Unit development to allow for the development of 31 single-family detached units and associated infrastructures in central Pasco County, abutting south of Wells Road, approximately 675 feet west of

   24:43Wells Road and Boyette Road intersection. section containing approximately 10.4 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation to approve the proposed voting amendment subject to the attached conditions of approval, and there's a presentation of so desired.

   MarianoChair

   24:56Okay. Is there anyone here to speak in opposition to item P forty two?

   25:02No one alive?

   Starkey

   25:03No one's on WebEx.

   MarianoChair

   25:05Item P forty-three.

   Starkey

   25:07Item P forty three was published in the Tampe Times on March twenty-fifth, twenty twenty-six.

   Oakley

   25:12Item P43 is PDE 260479. This is the First Amendment and Restated Development Agreement in the name of Wiregrass Ranch Development of Regional Impact, DRI. First Amendment and Restated Development Agreement between Locust Branch LLC and Pasco County to include the signalization of Wiregrass Ranch Boulevard and Chansey Road and other consistent revisions within the Wiregrass Ranch DRI. Located on the east side of Bruce B. Downs Boulevards, State Road 581, extending from the intersection of State Road 581

   25:43to State Road 56, north to the intersection of State Road 581 and State Road 54, and on the south side of State Road 56 in south central Pasco County. This comes to you with a recommendation to approve the development agreement. And there's a presentation as one desire.

   MarianoChair

   25:58Okay. Is there anyone in the audience, the public that would like to speak to item P forty three in opposition? Is there anyone online?

   Starkey

   26:07No one's on WebEx.

   MarianoChair

   26:08Okay. So the consent agenda is complete. Move approved for the consent items. Second. All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Okay. That'll take us back to R 37. We've got Florida Sports for the annual report. Adam Thomas.