PDE-26-7917
Published agendaHeard once, at the Planning Commission on Mar 19, 2026.
Official title
Special Exception (Consent) — Love Property/John T. Love & Laura M. Love — A Special Exception for a Reduced Rear Yard Building-line Setback for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) in an E-R Estate Residential District – West Central Pasco County – North Side of Lakeview Dr, Approximately 200 Feet West of Osceola Drive – Containing Approximately 1.56 acres.
Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording
TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 57% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
- 12mUnidentified speakerVoice A
The first item on the consent agenda is PC3. It's PDE 267917. Special exception in the name of Love Property, John T. Love and Laura M. Love for a reduced rear yard building line setback for an accessory dwelling unit in ADU. In an ER, a state residential district located on the west side, excuse me, located in west central Pasco County, on the north side of Lakeview Drive. Approximately 200 feet west of Osceola Drive, containing approximately 1.56 acres. And this is coming with
the recommendation to approve the special exception request with conditions, conditions as set forth under the recommended conditions section below. Authorize the chairman to execute the one original order provided and direct board records to distribute as set forth under the distribution section below.
Charles GreyChairAll right. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? See no one next?
Unidentified speakerVoice AItem PC four, you'll be sitting as the local planning agency. It's PDE 260435. It's a comprehensive plan amendment CPA 2601. Westmarket area R O R, future land use, density text amendment, providing for a text amendment to the future land use element appendix section flu A-6 and a text amendment to the glossary and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer, severability, and an effective date.
And this is coming with the recommendation that The Planning Commission find the proposed amendment excuse me, the local planning agency find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Jaimie GirardiVice ChairMr. Chairman I have a question about this one? Can you pull it?
Charles GreyChairOkay, so P C three we pulled? P C four. No, it's P Course I'm sorry. Or.
Unidentified speakerVoice AAnd that's the remainder of the consent agenda.
Jon MoodyMove to approve item PC
Charles GreyChairthree.
Jon MoodyWe
Charles GreyChairhave a motion.
Unidentified speakerVoice BSecond.
Charles GreyChairWe have a second. Further discussion on the motion on PC three. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Okay.