Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record

PEG-24-0334

Published agenda

3 appearances between Jun 20, 2024 and Aug 21, 2024, at 2 boards.

OutcomeNo action by the Board of County Commissioners on Jul 9, 2024
No action was required as this was the first hearing. The adoption hearing was set for August 21, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

Official title

An Ordinance By The Pasco County Board Of County Commissioners Amending The Pasco County Land Development Code; Amending Section 1105. Self-Storage Facilities Design Standards; Section 1105.2 Applicability; Section 1105.4 Corridor Specific Design Standards; Section 1105.5 General Design Standards; And Other Sections, As Necessary, For Internal Consistency; Providing For Applicability; Repealer; Providing For Severability; Inclusion Into The Land Development Code, And An Effective Date.

On a calendar

Jun 20, 2024 → Aug 21, 2024 · click a mark to jump to that appearance

Every appearance2 of 3 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 84% of 51 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong. 1 of the 3 appearances are not in any recording, so what was said at those is not here.

  1. 1
    Planning CommissionPC11Consent agendaApproved
    Approved minutes

    Approved the item per Staff’s recommendation.

    Open this item →No recording
  2. 2
    Board of County CommissionersP50Public hearingNo action
    Approved minutes

    No action was required as this was the first hearing. The adoption hearing was set for August 21, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in New Port Richey.

    Open this item →
    8m
    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Item P fifty was published in Taipei Times on June 5, 2024.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Item P fifty is PEG twenty four zero three three four. It's an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, amending Section 1105, Self-Storage Facilities Design Standards, Section 1105.2 Applicability, Section 1105.4, Ford Ord-Specific Design Standards, Section 1105.5, General Design Standards and other sections as necessary for internal consistency, providing for applicability repealer, providing for separability

    inclusion in the land development code and an effective date. This is the first hearing for this ordinance. I can go through the presentation for the benefit of the board.

    So on January 9, the Board of County Commissioners directed the Planning and Economic Growth Department to initiate an amendment to Section 1105.5, General Design Guidelines of the Self-Storage Facilities Design Standards Chapter, to remove the complete prohibition of open and RV bolt storage in the transit corridor north of State Road 52 for that portion that's in the urban service area. And on April 11th. Then we discussed this internally and this had gone to the uh made it to the local planning agency by June

    the 20th. This amendment is predicated on a previous ordinance that was adopted by the board in December 7 of 2021, which among other things established freestanding recreational vehicle and bold storages as special exceptions in C3, I1, and I2 general industrial park districts. Um in which, in that amendment, uh having been made special exceptions, uh these uses

    are now conditionable uh under the Land Development Code to ensure uh appropriate landscaping and other uh requirements are met, as well as to preserve the future industrial capability of different sites that may be used for RV and vote uh. outdoor storage.

    Uh what's included in the amendment here are a number of uh scriveners error corrections, uh a cleaner definition to the Corridor Setback uh with some additional housekeeping, and then the actual amendment that the Board of County Commissioners uh uh directed in January of 2024. Uh this this map illustrates some of the housekeeping uh That's being that's being done. A clarification here: the intent was US 19 to the Sun Coast Parkway, but there was a typo including

    Moon Lake. Um, some of the other amendments that are throughout include uh these fixes on the on the word section within the uh text. Uh and then this is the definition of the setback uh for the corridors. The corridor setback shall be. measured from the edge of the ultimate right-of-way per the transportation quarter preservation widths as established in table seven-two of the comprehensive plan. So it's a it's an update to the definition. This

    is the actual amendment that the board recommended or directed staff, I should say, in January of 2024. Um along the Sun Coast Parkway for the segment of that transit corridor that is north of Stable 52 and within the urban service area, open RB Bull storage may be allowed as a special exception within the 200 foot corridor setback if the parcel or that portion of the parcel is zoned in C3, I1, or I2. All required landscaping and screening may be more stringent than required by the land development code

    by virtue of the special exception and the conditions placed thereon. And the special exception use may all the special exception may also time limit the use so that there's a sunset eventually in the event that an industrial user comes along and wants to use the box.

    And uh with this we request that the board accept public comment uh on the matter and this will come before the board again on August 21st, 2024, at 1.30 p.m. in New Port.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Okay. Is there

    Jack Mariano

    any questions by the board? Mr. Chairman Mariano just one question. Yes, sir. Um you you've got the board or not, it's Sun Coast Parkway. And you've got about three hundred acres along Shady Hills Road where there's a at least I think three hundred acres of industrial coming and probably some more going up along there. Uh being that these uh special exceptions are gonna cause very little traffic. Do you ever think about expanding out to that point as opposed to just the Sun Coast Parkway?

    Ron OakleyChair

    Uh I think the I think this uh language covers both sides of the Sun Coast. So those three hundred acres will be in the included in that.

    Jack Mariano

    Alright, so how far past the Sun the Sun Coast are you making this boundary?

    Ron OakleyChair

    Well, it's saying that uh within the two hundred and fifty feet of the corridor there's a provision, except for that portion that is north of fifty-two along the Sun Coast. So that two hundred and fifty feet sort of disappears north of fifty-two along the Sun Coast on both sides.

    Jack Mariano

    Uh but uh again the Sun Coast Parkway is to the west of Shady Hills Road. Yes. So does this have anything to do with that or is it Did I need to change that?

    Ron OakleyChair

    It won't affect anything along the city. Okay. All right. I'm good then.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Okay.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Thank you.

    Unidentified speakerVoice A

    Any other questions?

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Just I just want to be sure that the landscape buffer is robust because that is a designated as a scenic corridor and we don't want to see all the R V and trailers and everything as you're driving down the beautiful Sun Coast. Yeah. Right. But I think that's in here is that it's a it's it takes it has to be opaque.

    Jack Mariano

    Yes.

    Yeah.

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Not just a tree every thirty feet.

    Ron OakleyChair

    So this is uh this is a public hearing. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item? Yes, ma'am.

    Name and address for the clerk.

    Pastor Jim

    Hi, Pastor Jen Carouac, [address removed]. Just to Commissioner Mariano's point, I think that this provides an increased, you know, um more professional visibility and I don't know because I'm not part of Pulti, but Dell Webb is invested all that money along Shady Hills Road, so not sure that they would stand in agreement with not providing additional um

    requirements along Shady Hills Road.

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    This is for RV boat story.

    Pastor Jim

    Right. So along Shady Hills Road, as Commissioner Mariano uh um stated, there's about three hundred and eighty-four or so acres that is um zone light industrial. Um so that is a potential place for storage facilities. So I would stand in agreement with an increased um um requirement to make it more lovely. Yeah.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Okay. I think we covered that a Anyone else anyone else wish to speak to this item? Seeing no one. Any other discussion from there's no action required on this item today.

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Mr. Chairman we have no one on WebEx.

    Ron OakleyChair

    No one on WebEx.

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Okay.

    Unidentified speakerVoice B

    All right. So this is the first of your two public hearing and the second public hearing will be held on August twenty first, twenty twenty four at one thirty PM in New Port Richey or is Send may be heard.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Okay. All right, with that we will move to our regular items. Um

  3. 3
    Board of County CommissionersP64Public hearingNo disposition in the minutes
    Open this item →
    1m
    Ron OakleyChair

    Item P64 is PEG 240334. This is an ordinance by the Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, amending the Pasco County Land Development Code, amending Section 1105, Self-Storage Facilities Design Standards, Section 1105.2 applicability, Section 1105.4, Corridor Specific Design Standard. Section 1105.5, general design standards and other sections as necessary for internal consistency, providing for applicability repeal order, providing for several inclusion to land development code and an effective date. This

    is the second reading and comes to you with an a recommendation to adopt the proposed ordinance by roll call vote.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Okay. Has anyone signed up to speak to this item as a public hearing?

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    We do not have anyone signed up in advance nor online. Okay.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Does anyone in the audience wish to speak to this item that didn't get a chance to sign up for it? Seeing no one. Pleasure of the board.

    Marlita Lasseter

    Uh

    Mr. Craig? Second.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Got a motion and second. All those in favor by roll call vote.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey.

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Aye.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    District four, Commissioner Yeager.

    Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

    Aye.

    Unidentified speakerVoice C

    District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District one, Chairman Oakley.

    Ron OakleyChair

    Aye. Motion pass five zero. Move to Item sixty five.