PEG-24-7744

Every appearance1 of 1 are in a recording

TranscriptWhat was said at each appearance is below it. Machine transcription, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 92% of 48 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

1. 1Mar 12, 2024
   Board of County CommissionersP64Public hearingAdopted

   Approved minutes

   Approved Staff’s recommendation to adopt the Zoning Amendment to C-2 by a roll call vote.

   Open this item →▶ Play from 1:01:48
   ▶ 1:01:486m

   Starkey

   1:01:48P sixty four.

   OakleyChair

   1:01:50Did we do sixty three?

   Starkey

   1:01:52We did sixty three.

   OakleyChair

   1:01:53We did, okay. Yes

   Starkey

   1:01:54sir.

   OakleyChair

   1:01:54All right, sixty four.

   Starkey

   1:01:56Okay, P sixty four was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times October eighteenth, twenty twenty three. It was continued from January ninth to today.

   OakleyChair

   1:02:05Okay.

   Starkey

   1:02:07Good

   Denise

   1:02:07afternoon, Commissioner. Denise Hernandez, Planning Planning and Economic Growth. Item P sixty four is PG twenty-four seven seven four-four. It's a zoning amendment. Davewood Hani and Nima Todner Mead for a change in zoning from an R3 High and Medium Density Residential District and C1 neighborhood commercial district to a C2 general commercial district with several voluntarily agreed upon deed restrictions which are included in your agenda packet under finding of fact number two, which includes some of the following. The applicant has

   1:02:37agreed to prohibit direct and indirect access to. Waverly Avenue, installing a six-foot-high block wall along the west on along Waverly Avenue and along that portion of Shaw Avenue that abuts residential zoning district at the time of preliminary site plan. Also including some additional buffering, which includes a shade tree every 20 feet between the block wall and Waverly Avenue, and between the block wall On that portion of Shaw Avenue that a puts residential zoning district.

   1:03:08Then also limiting hours of operation from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday, being closed on Sunday, having a 25-foot setback provided along the south front property line facing Waverly Avenue, not having any overhead doors facing Waverly Avenue, and of course also including the Live Local Act deed restriction that specifically. States that the uses will be those uses that are consistent with C2. Also prohibiting certain uses which include car washes, gas stations, drive-thru restaurants,

   1:03:38self-storage facility, freestanding recreational vehicle and boat storage, and C2 general commercial district conditional uses and special exception uses. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Economic Growth Department and the Planning Committee. I do not see anyone here signed up to speak. It was on regular because there were some concerns which possibly have been addressed through the voluntarily agreed upon deed restrictions. So if you would please call for public comment.

   OakleyChair

   1:04:06Okay. Has anyone signed up to speak to the saddle?

   Starkey

   1:04:11So um someone has signed up but it does not look like he is online, correct, Mr. Peppers? Correct. Okay, so no one is

   OakleyChair

   1:04:19No one's here to speak. No one's here to speak. Anybody in the audience wishes to speak this item? Seeing no one questions of board. Yeah, I want to

   Mariano

   1:04:27say I think staff did a good job with this. I mean C2's all around it, so I think they did good, listened to the neighborhood. So the for them not to show means it didn't great work. So yeah,

   Denise

   1:04:36the applicant was willing to to agree to deed to the voluntarily agreed upon deed restrictions and the planning commission really did a great job for getting to that point.

   Starkey

   1:04:49Commission meeting on this. Was this your did you have two of them or one? Planning commission?

   Denise

   1:04:53We had one Planning Commission meeting. It's been continued, so it

   1:04:56was

   1:04:56continued at one point in time. So yes.

   Starkey

   1:04:59And but there were some deedress uh code

   Denise

   1:05:02violations around there. Code violations on you may know or Liam might know more information on that.

   Liam Devine

   1:05:09So there was um code violations on the adjacent property. Liam Devine, Planning and Economic Growth Department. Um there were some um code violations. The property owner actually owns an adjacent property um that had code violations and he was cited for that and has is going through the process of correcting those violations.

   Starkey

   1:05:27So I I'm looking at the map here and I'm looking

   OakleyChair

   1:05:32I don't know who he is. Um

   Starkey

   1:05:33like what road is that? Is that fifty four? Is it on fifty four? I'm looking up fifty four at that the building with the orange roof. I don't know. Is that his property?

   Liam Devine

   1:05:43That's his property, but that property is not included in the subject rezoning. Okay, but how did how

   Starkey

   1:05:48did he concrete the whole thing?

   Liam Devine

   1:05:52So that would be for his adjacent property, he could speak to that, but that's not related to the

   Starkey

   1:05:56I just someone needs to look at that because you're not I mean the whole front the whole front of that commercial piece is concrete. From side to side. So I'm just curious. Um just want to call that out to someone to look at. Um it just bothers me when people come in and do things against our rules and Um I guess that's a subject for another date, but um I do appreciate that

   1:06:26someone at the Planning Commission, lots of times, it's John, um, points out code violations around property that we're looking at. Yeah and I hope that when he does that someone a alerts code um or minimum housing or someone and they go out and do take a look at it, that it doesn't just fall on deaf ears because they don't all have to come from commissioners' offices. They should a anyone can turn in code violations. But I'm looking at a building that paved

   1:06:56the whole front yard of uh right down right next to it. So

   OakleyChair

   1:07:00Okay. Motion

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:07:03mo I

   1:07:03have

   Mariano

   1:07:03a motion on the floor to approve.

   Starkey

   1:07:05Second.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:07:06So and that's the primary motion to zone it to C two. So you've got three motions on this in this particular one, but I you're you're it's the primary motion, which is to rezone to C two, just for clarity. So

   Liam Devine

   1:07:18yes. Sorry if I if I may. Um there were provided alternative motions. Um since this was a little bit of a controversial item at planning. Commission staff provided alternative motions. Um I don't know if you want me to go through the alternative motions, but staff is recommending approval.

   Unidentified speakerVoice A

   1:07:35That the motion that the commissioner is making is to rezone it to C2. Which is alternative motion one. Which is the which is the primary motion. Right. That's okay. Not the alternatives. Okay.

   OakleyChair

   1:07:46We got a motion and a second by roll call vote.

   Starkey

   1:07:49District 2, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District 3, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District 4, Commissioner Bradford.

   1:07:56District 5 Commissioner Mariano.

   OakleyChair

   1:07:58Aye.

   Starkey

   1:07:58District 1, Chairman Oakley.

   OakleyChair

   1:08:00Aye. Motion pass 5-0. That ends the public hearing items. Um