An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To the Future Land Use Element Chapter 2 Goal FLU 6: Including Text And Figure Revisions To The Core Reserve, Village Separator Provisions, Existing Development Approvals, And Figures PH-5, PH-6, PH-7, And Ph-8 Revisions To Village I Borders; And As Necessary, For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionAdopted
Approved to adopt the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment item per Staff’s
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 26, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 26, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-0004 in full →PDD-21-0004 was taken up 2 times between Dec 8, 2020 and Jan 26, 2021 — this is appearance 2.
- Dec 8, 2020BoardP119▶Approved
- Jan 26, 2021BoardP47▶Adoptedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 95% of 22 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Yes, we do. Item P forty seven was published in the Tampa Bay Times on November 4th, 2020.
Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman. Commissioner's Denise Hernandez Denise Hernandez Planning and Development. Item P47 is PDD 21. Zero zero zero four and this item was presented to the board at the first reading on uh December eighth, twenty twenty. There was a full presentation, so I will read the item uh the ordinance title and today we requ re we're asking you to adopt the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. So, this is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a large-scale
comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use element, Chapter 2, Goal Future Land Use 6, including text and figure revisions to the core reserve, village separator provisions, existing development approvals, and figures PH5, PH six, pH 7, pH 8, revisions to village eye borders. And as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer, severability, and an effective date. Again, this is the adoption hearing on this item. So if you would adopt it by roll call vote. We have
a problem. Oh wait, you gotta see public
hearing.
Um anyone or speak to this item?
Uh Mr. Chair, there are no one on the WebEx and there is no no emails on this matter either.
Uh anyone at the kioks?
There is not enough of kiosk.
All right, thank you. I do have
a question.
Well,
I just wanna know how much um planning has gone in for trails in here. Because I I see an alternative roads map and Is this are we on forty three? Just to make sure I'm on the right-of-way. Uh P forty forty seven.
Because I you know, I I'd be very interested in seeing a map of the trails and how they're crossing some of these busy roads because we've gotten ourselves in messes. And I'm concerned that by the way for Sunco uh The one that's going through villages of Pasadena, but
this is a comprehensive plan amendment, Commissioner.
Okay, so I'm I'm looking at the wrong one. I'll look at the next one. I'll bring this up when we go to this other one. Right.
I know I'm looking at that. I wanna talk to you about it.
All right. I have a motion and a do I have a second? And a second? All those and by row call vote?
Yes, sir. District two, Commissioner Moore. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Aye.
District one, Chairman Oakley.
Aye. Motion passed five zero. Okay, we go to Forty eight, I guess it is. Yeah.