Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Robert and Theresa Britton – Change in Zoning from an A-C Agricultural District to an A-R Agricultural Residential District – Northeast Pasco County – on the West Side of Easterling Road, Immediately North of the Junction of Easterling Road and Happy Hill Road– Containing Approximately 10.88 Acres (PC: 4/01/21, 1:30 p.m.; DC Hybrid Virtual Meeting, BCC: 4/20/21, 1:30 p.m.; NPR Hybrid Virtual Meeting)
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Apr 1, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Apr 1, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-7523 in full →PDD-21-7523 was taken up 2 times between Apr 1, 2021 and Apr 20, 2021 — this is appearance 1.
- Apr 1, 2021PlanningPC4▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Apr 20, 2021BoardP51Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 92% of 26 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Following item is Pc4, Pdd twenty-one, seven five, two, three. In the name of names of Robert and Teresa Britton for a change in zoning from AC Agricultural District to AR Agricultural Residential District, with a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that limits the property to a total of two lots. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
Okay. Then is the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present.
Anyone here to object?
We have no one at the kiosk that signed up to speak on the item, nor have we received any emails or letters of objection on this item.
Okay. And and then that consent item.
Next item is PC five, PDD 210250. This is a development agreement. So on this item, you're sitting as a local planning agency. It's under the name of Meritage Homes of Florida, Inc. Development agreement to provide a drainage retention area in exchange for mobility fee credits and a partial waiver of neighborhood park and landscaping landscape buffer requirements comes to you with a recommendation of for you to find it consistent with the comprehensive plan and for you to recommend approval of the proposed development agreement
to the Board of County Commissioners.
All right. And the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present.
All right, is there any objectors?
We have not received any emails in objection nor um uh request to speak in objection on this item nor is there anyone at the public comment kiosk to speak on the item.
Okay, so do we uh uh have any questions from up up here? No. All right, let's uh let's see. Is there
and that concludes your um consent agenda.
Okay. So we uh We have uh what two items on consent?
PC four, PC four.
Yes, uh you should have two do you have PC four and PC five
on consent. So do I have a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended?
Jamie Gerardi, I'll make a motion to approve the consent agenda.
Consists of
items PC four and PC five.
Okay, and we have a second. Any second service pool? Any further discussion on the motion? All in favor? Signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed?
Let me share
my screen.
Allow me to share.
Okay, now