Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Creighton Boyette & Overpass MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Creighton Companies, LLC, et. al - A Rezoning Request from an A-R Agricultural-Residential Zoning District and an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow Development of a Maximum of 27,000 Square-Feet of Non-Residential Uses on Approximately 4.95 Acres – No Funding Required
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 6, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, May 6, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-7533 in full →PDD-21-7533 was taken up 2 times between May 6, 2021 and Jun 22, 2021 — this is appearance 1.
- May 6, 2021PlanningPC3▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Jun 22, 2021BoardP50Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 10m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 90% of 83 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
The following item is PC2, PDD 217532. This is a special exception for Palm River Dairy Inc. As I understand it, there are folks at the kiosk and I would like to verify with Mr. Zodian that that's the case, in which case this will be removed from the consent.
All right. This is the kiosk and yes there are two folks here to speak.
Thank you. So that will be a little bit more than a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a little
That's PC two.
That's correct. Following item is PC3. That's PDD 217533. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Creighton Boyette and overpass MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Creighton Companies LLC and others. A rezoning request from an AR Agricultural Residential District and an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow. development of a maximum of 20,000 square feet of non-residential uses on approximately
4.95 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Okay. Is is there anyone present to speak on this one?
Can you check and see if there's anyone present to speak? I believe I believe the answer is no, but please double check at the kiosk.
No one is here to speak on that matter.
Okay, let's go to the next one.
And the applicant is virtually present on that one as well. Following item is PC four. This is the Companion Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment on the item, PDD twenty-one zero three six zero, C Pass twenty oh one, Creighton Boyette, and overpass commercial small scale. Comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps 2-15 and sheet 14 from REST 3 residential three dwelling units for Gross Acre to COM Commercial on approximately 4.906 acres located at the southeast corner of Boyette Road
and Overpass Road on this item. You're sitting as a local planning agency. And we're asking you to find this consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
All right. Is the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present.
Is there anyone here to object?
There is no one here to object.
Alright.
If the applicant doesn't want to speak then we'll uh Move under to the next one.
Next one is PC6, PDD 210254. This is a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment, C Pass 2005 in the name of Orange State Grove. Small scale comp plan amendment to the future land use maps 2-15 and sheet 21 from res 3 residential three dwelling units per gross acre to res 9 residential 9 dwelling units per gross acre on approximately 2.32 acres of property to allow for Eleven. Family, single family detached units. It's located on the west side of Livingston Road and
north of County Line Road, providing for severability and effective date. This is on this item, you're sitting as a local planning agency, and we're asking that you find it consistent with the comprehensive plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Okay. Is the applicant president?
On this item, I do not see the applicant virtually present on WebEx.
Is there anyone here to object?
We do not have anyone here to object on that item.
Okay.
Uh the next one?
The following one is PC seven. This is a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment. C PAL 2103 Causeway, providing for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps 2-15 and sheet 12, changing from COM commercial to PD plan development on approximately 35 acres of property located at the southwest corner of Roach's Run in Land O' Lakes Boulevard, and a text amendment creating sub-area policy. Flu 7.1.58 Causeway PD and a map amendment to
the future land use map 2-9, adding sub-area map 2-958 causeway. Um, this one again, you're also sitting as the local planning agency on this item. There is a correction on your agenda memo on this that basically states that uh there shall be a minimum of six acres of non-residential land uses along. US 41, I believe your agenda memo states there shall be a minimum of 5.7 acres. So there's a correction to that item on there. And uh again, you're
sitting as the local planning agency on this one, and we're asking that you find it consistent with the actually I've been told that it's the opposite way that your your agenda memo says a minimum of six acres and it should be 5.7 acres. I apologize. Um you're we're asking that you find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
The applicant is virtually present.
Anyone here to speak?
We have no one to speak on the item.
Okay.
The following item PC eight, I believe, will also be removed from consent. Um, and I'm let me check with uh Mr. Zodiaan that there's some folks to speak on that item at the kiosk.
Okay.
Would you let us know, Ed, please?
If that's the uh C PAL twenty eleven, there is no one here now to speak. They They can sell it.
Okay, all right, thank you so much. So I will read that into record and it will stay on consent. PDD 210328. This is a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment. CPAL 2011 for Wesley Chapel Lakes, providing for a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map 2-15 and Sheet 22, changing from Res 3, residential three dwelling units per gross acre, and ROR, retail office. Residential to PD plan development on approximately 303 acres of property and a text amendment creating
sub-area policy. Flu 7.1.56 Wesley Chapel Lakes and a MAP amendment to the future land use map 2-9, adding sub-area map 2-956 Wesley Chapel Lakes. And uh on this one, you're also sitting as a local planning agency. So we're asking that you find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Okay. Is the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present.
Do they wish to speak?
They wish to speak.
Are you asking the applicant if the applicant wishes to speak? So I think the applicant, let's see, we can unmute their the applicant's microphone so the applicant can tell us.
Mrs. Barbara Wilhite. No, we don't have anything further to add.
Okay.
And that's the that should end your consent agenda with PC two having been removed.
Okay.
Just for confirmation, did you do PC five?
Yeah, I was thinking of missing.
Okay, well, thank you very much for letting me know. I skipped PC five. So we're gonna go to PC five. I apologize.
Thank you.
So PC five is PDD 210361. It's a small scale comprehensive plan amendment. CPAT 2006, Shady Hills, and Helen K Drive. It's a small scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use maps two-15 and sheet oh sheet five from what res one residential one dwelling unit. For Gross Acre to Com Commercial on approximately four acres of property located on the east northeast corner of Shady Hills Road and Helen Kay Drive. And on this item, again, you're sitting as a local planning agency and
we're asking that you um find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. And now it does end your consent agenda. Thank you.
Okay. Pfive, so is the applicant present?
The applicant is virtually present. Ms. Will Hight is the applicant on that item.
Anyone is anyone else here?
We don't have anyone to object. An objection.
Jamie, do you have a question? Um
Mr. Chairman I clarify one thing on PC six on the agenda memo. So that's a request to go to Res9, but the proposed use, future use is light industrial. Is that a Error in the agenda memo.
That is certainly an error in the agenda memo. I know this area very, very well. This is just to add a few lots to the Orange State Grove MPUD. So certainly we will let the planner know that there is an error on the agenda memo.
Just want to make sure you got that before it got to the in front of the commissioner. So okay.
Thank you for letting us all, Mr. Chairman Mariano.
So do do we need to change that now? Even
Um yeah, I mean I think you could make the recommendation well If staff knows what to correct, I don't think you need to say do anything. If you're right. The actual request is to go to res nine. So i if that's what you're approving, I don't think you Need to fix the addition. Staff can do that.
Just leave it on consent then.
Okay.
Alright. So uh If we have a motion to approve consent agenda as submitted, as changed.
Yes Jamie Gerardi, I make a motion to approve the consent agenda. It's PC three, four, five, six, seven, and eight. With the noted correction of the acreage on PC seven.
Okay. We have a motion uh to approve. I'll second that one, Peter Hansel. We have an and we have a second. Any further discussion of the motion?
All in favor of the motion is taken five by roll call.
Jimmy Droordy? Uh Sonny Anderson?
Aye.
Peter Hansel.
Aye.
Roberto Saiz?
Hi.
Christopher Poole. Chris Williams.
Bye.
Chairman Charles
Gray.
Aye.
Okay.