Zoning Amendment (Continuance) – Acorn 54 LLC/Acorn – MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District (Wyndfields) to a C-2 General Commercial District – South Central Pasco County – on the South Side of State Road 54, West of the Intersection of State Road 54 and River Glen Boulevard – Containing Approximately 9.235 Acres (PC: 8/5/21, 1:30 p.m.; DC, BCC: 9/13/21, 1:30 p.m.; DC)
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Aug 5, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Aug 5, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-21-7550 in full →PDD-21-7550 was taken up 2 times between Aug 5, 2021 and Sep 15, 2021, continued 1 time — this is appearance 1.
- Aug 5, 2021PlanningPC1▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Sep 15, 2021BoardP103▶Continued
No appearance of this case has a final disposition in the minutes. It was continued, or the minutes do not dispose of it in writing — which is true for 24% of items.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 7 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
So um let's then move on to the regular items.
Okay, great. Um the Denise Hernandez Planning and Development. The first item is PC One, PDD 217550. It's a zoning amendment for Acorn 54 LLC, Acorn MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District. And it's it's from an MPUD to a C2, sorry about that. And uh the request is for a continuance to the November 4th, 2021 Planning Commission meeting at 130 in Dade City.
Okay. Is the applicant present?
The applicant is physically present.
No, I don't see anyone.
And also to mention that there has there's no one signed up on WebEx to speak on this item either.
Okay. So do we have a motion to approve the continuance request? So moved. Second. And we have a second. Any further discussion of the motion? All in favor, signify by saying aye. All aye, opposed, like, sign. Motion carries.