Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
R67No disposition in the minutesRegular businessPublished agenda

(11:45 AM Time Certain) Presentation - State Representative Amber Mariano - Funding for Lindrick Area Sewer System and Water Quality Upgrades and Pasco County Ackerman Street Drainage Improvements - No Funding Required

Legislative/Administrative - County AdministratorCA-21-5023District 3, 4

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Presentation Only

No disposition in the minutes

The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 28, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 28, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

CA-21-5023 in full →

Heard once. CA-21-5023 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Sep 28, 2021BoardR67No disposition in the minutesthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 6m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 31 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Ron OakleyChair

All right, move on to R sixty seven. That's a time certain one, sir.

I don't think I saw that. Oh here I did too.

Kathy Pearson

Good morning, Commissioners. Kathy Pearson, Assistant County Administrator for Public Services. I'm here for today for Keith Wiley, Director of Parks and Recreation. We had an emergency back at our office, so he needed to be with his team. Today we're talking about the uh request that came from the previous board meeting, PRN 21-0233, interlocal agreement. Agreement, Pasco County Tax Collector reimbursement of expenses associated with the uniform method of collection of

non-advalorum assessment for the Oakes Park Municipal Service Benefit Unit. Gotta click right here.

So this is a the site location of where this is.

And some I think I'm missing a slide here. So let me talk about some of the project background. Let me back up here. I guess we're missing a slide. Okay, here we go. Project background. So wanted to remind the board that on June 24th, 2014, the board did adopt ordinance number 14-10 creating the Oakes Park Municipal Service Benefit. MSBU and resolution number 14-230 authorizing the use of the uniform

method for levy, collection, and enforcement of the non-advalorum assessments for projects authorized pursuant to Chapter 197 Flora Statute. The purpose of the assessment is to provide open space within a half-mile walking distance of the surrounding community service area. The cost and the term, the MSBU is expected to charge 1,588 lots on an annual assessment of $135.39 per year for

a term of 15 years based on the acquisition cost of the $3 million. The start date, the non-advalorum assessment will be presented to the BCC to certify on or before September 15, 2022, following a public hearing, and property owners can expect to see the assessment on their 2022 tax bill.

So, with that said, the recommended action for the board approve the interlocal agreement with the Pasco County Tax Collector, thereby reimbursing them for costs associated with using the uniform method for levy collection enforcement of a non-advalarum assessment within the Oaks Park Municipal Service Benefit Unit.

Jack Mariano

Mr. Chairman Mariano

You're on.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Yeah, it doesn't sound like they're on.

Jack Mariano

At your at your last meeting I had advised you that the next step was to enter into an interlocal agreement. When we researched it we found that the the interlocal agreement with the property appraiser had been executed. Um the The tax collectors agreement which is before you today Um he had asked you for a one year deferral. And that one year deferral has been a little bit more than a little bit. Morphed into This. So the so

you have an agreement with property appraiser, you need an agreement with the tax collector, the tax collector's agreement is brought to you today.

Ron OakleyChair

Thank you.

Okay.

Jack Mariano

Mr. Chairman Mariano. Yes, sir. Um twenty fourteen I was actually chair. Mr. Stark was sitting with me. She was chair in twenty sixteen when this was moving forward. Uh we had vetted this all the way through. We had set the agreement ahead of time. Only because we're gonna try to get money from the state to actually cut the cost down did this get delayed. Why it why it got delayed further, we don't know. But at this point I'm gonna move approval to move forward.

Ron OakleyChair

Second. Okay, I got a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed, like, sign? Motion passed 5-0.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

I do wanna say I did think that Mr. Jelly's idea was interesting. Um that doesn't mean we I don't know if anyone wants to explore that or do you just wanna Leave it how it is because the other property this puts this takes the other property out of development. I just thought it was interesting. I know we need to get this in the book so that it can um get on the rolls, but that doesn't mean if anyone else wanted to explore that idea. Um

Kathy Pearson

If I can just add that the parks, recreation, natural resources, once the interlocal agreement is approved, we'll be working with the community's homeowners and and determine the various park options, space options. So we're not done with just the interlocal agreement.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Okay. Yeah, because there's still a lot of questions out there. Mm-hmm. Okay, so

Christina Fitzpatrick

Also, I would like to discuss to move to direct the staff to do a county initiative comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use classification of the property to recreational open space.

Jack Mariano

Second.

Jack Mariano

I'm not gonna bring it back, but Yeah, i this would just be to to start that process to go forward so that those so that

It's a parks designation, not a uh not a development designation.

You

Mike Moore

have a second.

Jack Mariano

Okay.

Ron OakleyChair

Got a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye

Mike Moore

aye. Aye.

Ron OakleyChair

All opposed like said? Motion passed 5-0. Okay. No clapping. Bye.