Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P75ApprovedPublic hearingPublished agenda

Mining Operating Permit and Conditional Use Amendment Request (Regular) – K & M Pasco 130 Holdings, LLC – Mining Operating Permit and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for an Existing Sand and Limerock Mine with No Blasting in A-C Agricultural and AR-1 Agricultural-Residential Districts – North West Pasco County – On the South Side of County Line Road, approximately 3,200 feet west of the Suncoast Parkway – Containing Approximately 129.80 Acres File Number PDD22-CU01

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.District 1

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approval with Conditions

Approved minutes

DispositionApproved

Approved Staff’s recommendation.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 26, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Oct 26, 2021

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 86% of 21 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
OakleyChair

Okay, move on to P75.

StarkeyVice Chair

Item P seventy five was published in the Dan Bay Times on August twenty-fifth, twenty twenty one.

Will Poon

Good afternoon, Commissioners. Um Will Poon, PE Senior Engineer in Current Planning. My items uh PDD 22-conditional use zero one mining operating permit and conditional use permit amendment requests for an existing sand and lime rock mine with no blasting. In agricultural and agricultural residential district, north of northwest Pasco County on the south side of County Line Road, approximately thirty two hundred. Feet. West of Suncoast Parkway and the applicant is

K and M Pasco 130 Holdings L L C

Here's the location as I previously mentioned just west of Suncoach Parkway. Scenario, as you can see, the the mining operation.

And the condition of use application as I mentioned earlier.

Just to paraphrase, basically they're uh I'm modifying their excavation of approximately two million six hundred and forty-two thousand three hundred and fifty-eight cubic yards of sand with an additional one million fifty-two thousand four hundred ninety-two cubic yards of sand. Outside original pit area for a total of three million six hundred ninety-four thousand eight hundred fifty cubic yards of sand, in addition to the previously approved one million eight hundred ninety-six thousand seven hundred and nineteen cubic yards of limerock limestone. They expanded the

limits of the mining from one hundred foot From the east and south property line. Uh the Lime Rock uh mining and sorting operation will remain the same as previously permitted, so no change there. The site plan have been updated to reflect as I four mentioned. And Also the duration and the operation Have remained the same. No change there. And here's the surrounding zoning areas.

Future land use, was that previously mentioned? Here's a site plan, a minute site plan as I I mentioned earlier, showing the uh expansion, and there will be a berm. And also landscaping associated with the improvements.

And we recommend approval conditions as set forth in your packet. Any questions? I'm here to answer any. Also the applicant's representative. Um and their um client is also here too.

OakleyChair

Okay.

Will Poon

Thank you. All right.

OakleyChair

Mr. Hope?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Clark Hobby, uh Hobby and Hobby PA 109 North Brest Street, Tampa, Florida. I've been sworn. I'm gonna be very brief. I believe the One person who spoke at Planning Commission is not here today to speak against project. We have a couple of our neighbors who are, I think, mostly in listening mode. Um we are expanding the mine footprint, but we're building a large berm uh on the south boundary. It's eight feet tall with landscape. and seating on there that will be an effective buffer. We

have a noise expert who's submitted two reports. Uh to the board and to the Planning Commission and who's online who will testify that we will meet all the noise requirements of the code. We've been operating since um I think it's been 10 or 12 years now and never have had a complaint. And I think we've been a good neighbor. Uh we've been for free grading the dirt roads south of the site that we do not use, that are about a half mile long, and there are four of them, and we've been doing that for

the better part of the last three, four, or five years, somewhere in that range. And so that's why I think you see none of our most adjacent neighbors are here complaining. So happy to answer any questions. Other than that, I'm just gonna hold the balance of my time in case anyone speaks.

OakleyChair

Okay. Is anyone signed up to speak to this time?

StarkeyVice Chair

No one is signed up and no one on WebEx.

OakleyChair

Okay. Is anyone here in the room to uh speak to this item. Seeing no one move approval.

Fitzpatrick

Second.

OakleyChair

I got a motion and a second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. All opposed like so? Motion passed. Five zero.