Appointment of the Audit Selection Committee – No Funding Required
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved the Consent Agenda including the Addendum Consent. Items C8 and C34 were pulled for discussion or revisions.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Nov 9, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Nov 9, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
OMB-22-0006 in full →Heard once. OMB-22-0006 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- Nov 9, 2021BoardC29▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 13 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Mr. Steinwater. Uh Mr. Chairman M You approved C twenty nine this morning, the appointment of the audit selection committee. I I wanted to make it clear to both the board and the and the more importantly, the constitutionals. This is based on a very strange statute which requires the elected officials to serve. So while the motion that was passed said or designees, the statute really says that it's
the electeds that have to that have to perform that duty unless they designate a non-employee to serve on their behalf. I don't know why the legislature feels that A deputy clerk is not as good as a non- but that's what it says. So I'm just just throwing that out there for clarification that that it's unfortunately it's the the Elected officials that serve on
that audit selection committee, and it's something that's statutorily required.
Is there some change that we need to approve or
I Technically the motion follows the statute. It's just that because it says or designee, I wanted to make and the the memo is clear. It says that it can't be an employee, but I just felt it was necessary to re-emphasize that
right
that because it is it is normal for The sheriff to send it to the right-of-way. a colonel or a major or the you know So Um not in this case.
Right. Mr. Steinsnyder, I read the statute too. And um there is a provision that you know provides or designee. And then there's another provision, I think it's subsection C, that says the county cannot have. a um an employee as their designee. It doesn't say the constitutionals. However, when I looked at GFOA's best practice, their best practice, even though it's not a mandate, provides that to have the elected
official or a designee that is a non-employee.
Yeah. Unfortunately we got guidance from the legislature, legislative staff that it it applied to both the elected both the constitutionals and the Board of County Commissioners. So that's
not with a little closet, but okay.
At all?
That's it. All right. Thank you. Madam Clerk.