Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) - CPAL20(16) New Port Corners - Transmittal of Proposed Text Amendments to the Future Land Use Element Appendix; a Map Amendment to the Future Land Use Map 2-9 Amending Subarea Map 2-9(25) New Port Corners; and Providing for Additional Text Amendments as Necessary for Internal Consistency.

22:28All right, thing no one, we'll move move on. We're now going to go to the consent agenda. And we have P sixty five.

22:37Madam Chairman, would you like rezoning procedures announced? Thank you. There are two rezoning agendas, regular and consent. Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there is no opposition, the application will be considered by the board without further presentation. If staff or planning commission has recommended denial or if there is opposition to the application, the applicant will be given five minutes for presentation. The opposition will be given three minutes for each individual.

23:08or five minutes for a group representative. and the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal. Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation, or anyone wishing to object to any condition of the rezoning, may at this time request the petition be pulled from the consent agenda In which case that application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise, all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to

23:38any petition, please give your name and address and whether or not you've been sworn for the record. These are quasi-judicial public hearing. The law in Florida is mere public court or opposition of an application. is insufficient for this board to take action. Please limit your comments to those criteria found within the Board's Land Development Code. Mr. Clerk, would you swear them in?

24:00Uh anyone wishing to speak to the items that are being presented under the uh matters to be heard at this hour, if you would please stand.

24:10And also um those online. We'll swear them in

24:13that as well.

24:17No one online? Uh no one online uh John? Oh okay. If you would please raise your hand. Do you swear that the or affirm that the testimony that you will give in this matter is truth, so have you got it? Thank you. Uh Madam Chairman, we have uh proof of publication of these uh two items on two different dates. Uh P65 was published in the Tampa Bay Times November 24th of 21. And as it relates to P 66,

24:48this matter was continued from January 11th, where it did have public notice in November of 2021.

24:56Okay, thank you very much. P sixty five.

24:59Uh good afternoon, Amy Heiler with Long Range Planning. Uh P sixty-five is going to be a large scale comprehensive plan amendment. It's the transmittal hearing for CPAL uh 21 or 2016, sorry, I thought it was 21 2016 Newport Corners. Uh the proposal is to amend the uh future land use element and map amendment to the future land use sub-area map two dash nine twenty five, located on the uh north and south of Decubelish Drive, north of Plath

25:29Road along uh uh Little Road and the Little Road Corridor, sorry. And the resolution to that is to amend the flu maps 2-925 and amend Appendix Flu. So, what this is is a Newport Corners Future Land Use Amendment. This is not a map amendment, it is an existing feature land use that is set in place, and we are proposing a text amendment to make some modifications to the originally entitled land uses. There is an MPUD accompanying this as well that you will hear in

25:59the next couple months. The proposed amendment is consistent with the following policies of the comprehensive plan. As you can see, it is located in the Central and Spring District of the West Market area. The uh aerial as you can see. Madam

26:15Chairman Mariano. Are you is it being

26:18it is on consent. I was going through this because we do ha I did have an edit as well, so it's up to you if I could proceed or not.

26:26What is that? I think we have do we have anyone who's signed up to speak to this? Not to speak

26:30to this item, no. Not to uh P sixty five.

26:33Is it and no one's online to speak to P sixty five?

26:36We have no one online, correct John?

26:39Board members, do you want to hear the presentation? No,

26:41leave my consent. It's consent. I'm not sure.

26:42It's just a minute.

26:43Leave my consent.

26:46Okay, you want to let us know what the edit is, please?

26:48So um there was an edit that was just um added to or just distributed. The edit is increasing the entitlements uh for 50,000 non-residential uses. We've been in negotiations on the MPUD with the applicants um to include flex split. They fec flex space uses within the Northeast Village as well as additional non-residential uses within that area. So what we're doing is just amending the text to include that to align with what was agreed upon on the MPD

27:18conditions so they match.

27:19All right, just to be sure, is there anyone in the uh the room here who would like to speak in opposition to this item? Okay, board members will uh keep it on consent. Thank you.

27:34As it relates to P sixty six, we have one person listed who is believed the applicant, and that's the only person listed for this item.

27:40Okay.

27:45So P66 is PDD 227580. It's a zoning amendment. James David Russell, it's a change in zoning from a C3 commercial light manufacturing district with specific use and R4 high density residential district to an AR agricultural residential district. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

28:08Is there anyone in the room that would leak like to speak in opposition to this item? Okay, seeing no one it's on consent. I'll accept questions.

28:18So move.

28:19Second. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? All right. None opposed. So we will go on to The next item, P67.