An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 22) From RES-6 (Residential-6 Du/Ga) To COM (Commercial) On Approximately 1.92 Acres Of Real Property Located At The Northeast Corner Of The Intersection Of SR 54 And Tupper Road; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionAdopted
Approved to adopt by a roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, May 17, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, May 17, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-0321 in full →PDD-22-0321 was taken up 2 times between Apr 21, 2022 and May 17, 2022 — this is appearance 2.
- Apr 21, 2022PlanningPC7Approved
- May 17, 2022BoardP68▶Adoptedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 6m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 21 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay, we are on to is that um Sixty eight. Sixty eight.
Item P sixty eight was published in the Tampa Bay Times on April sixth, twenty twenty two.
Good afternoon. Doreen Roy with Planning and Development. Item P tw uh sixty eight uh has had a minor uh adjustment. To the memorandum and you have a copy of that. It has been submitted with the clerk for record.
Item PDD 220321, small scale comprehensive plan amendment, CPAS 2208, Dempsey and Daughters.
An ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a small scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two-fifteen and sheet twenty-two from res six residential. to COM commercial on approximately 1.92 acres of real property located at the northeast corner of the intersection of SR-54 and
Tupper Road, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer, severability, and an Yeah. The property is located in the South Market area, urban service area.
The proposal is to amend the future land use flu maps two dash fifteen and sheet twenty-two from res six to comm commercial. at the northeast corner of the intersection of S R fifty four and Tupper Road. 1.92 acres. Zoning is R two Low Density Residential District and C two General Commercial District.
The following policies are consistent with the proposed comprehensive plan amendment, policy flu 1-6.3, transitional land uses. One point six point four neighborhood commercial uses and eight point one point two South Market Area Establishment.
This is the aerial location. Northeast corner, fifty-four and Tupper Road. Existing flu res six.
Proposed flu is commercial.
Existing zoning districts, Euclidean R two and C two.
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and adopt by roll call vote. Okay, public comment.
Okay, um does the applicant wish to speak?
Good afternoon. Barbara Wilhite, 6327 Grand Boulevard, New Port Richey, Florida, for the applicant, which is the Dempsey family. We appreciate staff and working with us to find a solution to this problem that was created when I was in college. In nineteen eighty nine when you adopted your comp plan you created a problem for their property because you created a conflict zoning. You made it a residential land use with a commercial zoning on it. State law required you within one year to to resolve those conflict zonings and the county has never done that
counting thirty years. So, what happens to property owners like the Dempseys is they have C2 property, they pay C2 taxes on it for 30 years, and then they go to sell it. Some the the buyer comes in to talk to the county about their proposed commercial use and the county says, Oh no. You got a conflict zoning. Oh no. And so two years I've been working on this, trying to get this resolved. A couple of different quite a few of the commissioners have intervened to try to get this resolved and I appreciate that on behalf of the Dempsey family. I only point this out because this is an ongoing problem and there's a lot
of property owners that are not being treated fairly. by the process and how this has been done. You are updating your comp plan. Hopefully this is something that could be resolved when you do that. But thank you very much for each of you that intervened on behalf of the Dempsey family to try to find uh you know push f forward a solution. Uh this was done completely under the comp plan. There's nothing that was special that was done or anything, but I appreciate you uh your interest in trying to get this resolved for the family and the all the other folks that have found themselves in the same situation. Thank you.
Well, Yeah, that that bothers me. If we have something that comes forward with the conflict zoning, I think it should be elevated to With uh shouldn't take two years when obviously That shit I mean commercial is what we want there. Yeah, that that shouldn't happen. Especially in this scenario. Okay, is anyone in the public wish to speak on this?
Okay, um this is uh roll call vote.
Madam Chair, there's no one signed up and no one on WebEx, but it's
move approval. Second.
Uh roll call. District one, Commissioner Oakley, District two, Commissioner Oakley District four, Commissioner Fitzpatrick. Aye. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District three, Chairman Starkey. Aye. Right, P sixty nine. Item P sixty nine. Um was published in the Tampa Times on April sixth, twenty twenty two.