Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Hillcrest MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – MMLJ Holdings, LLC. And Christina H. Dilorenzo – A Rezoning Request from an A-C Agricultural Zoning District and an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of a Maximum of 1,800 Single-family Detached Dwelling Units, 600 Single-family Townhouses, 450,000 Square Feet of Retail and 200,000 Square feet of Light Industrial/Office on Approximately 740.2 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
DispositionApproved
Approved as part of the Public Hearing Consent Agenda.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, May 19, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, May 19, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-7592 in full →PDD-22-7592 was taken up 3 times between May 5, 2022 and Jun 21, 2022 — this is appearance 2.
- May 5, 2022PlanningPC2▶No disposition in the minutes
- May 19, 2022PlanningPC3▶Approvedthis item
- Jun 21, 2022BoardP71▶Approved
What was said
Machine transcription of 7m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 84% of 50 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Thank you. Um moving on to PC3, PDD 227592. It's a zoning amendment in the name of Hillcrest MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, MMLJ Holdings, LLC, and Christina H. DeLorenzo. This is a rezoning request from an AC Agricultural District and an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to a Allow for the development of a maximum of eighteen hundred single-family detached dwelling units, six hundred single-family town townhomes, four hundred and fifty thousand square feet
of retail, and two hundred thousand square feet of light industrial office on approximately seven hundred and forty point two acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
All right, this is a consent agenda item. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object?
And for the record we don't have anyone signed up on WebEx to object to the item.
Following item is PC four PDD twenty-two seventy-six twenty. This is a county initiated zoning amendment. The name of the owner is One Lakuchi Center, WREC Property EDC Project. It's for a change in zoning from an R4 high density residential district to an I1 Light Industrial Park District. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval.
All right. Is the applicant present?
It's the county. It's the
county.
All right. Then
they are present. Yes. Is anyone here to object?
And for the record we don't have anyone signed up on WebEx to speak on the item.
Thank you.
The following item is going to be pulled from consent, which is PC five PDD 227585. Uh you did receive a letter of objection, and we do have some folks here. in in to speak to the item. Thank you. So I'll move on to PC six. PC six says PDD twenty-two seven five six five is a zoning amendment in the name of Faircloth MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Faircloth Parker LLC, and others. It's a rezoning request from an AC agricultural district to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow the development
of a maximum of 380 single-family detached and attached residential units on approximately 180. seven point five acres comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
All right, is that applicant present? Anyone here to object?
And for the record we have no one signed up to speak on the matter on WebEx.
All right, thank you.
Following item is PC 7, that is PDD 227618, zoning amendment in the name of I-75 Logistics Center, MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development. It's formerly known as PASCO Commerce Center, MPUD. GC Pasco Owner, LLC, and John Lewis Grossenbacher Trust. A substantial modification to allow the inclusion of approximately 56.17 additional acres and increase the maximum entitlements to 1.9 million square feet on approximately 224.57
acres comes here with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
All right. Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? How would your actions?
Denise, can you just do me a favor when that goes to the board, could you ch change the title to say one million nine thousand one million nine hundred thousand square feet of industrial, so it's clear what we're Approving.
Noted. Mr. Chair, I do have a question on this one if we could if we could pull it.
Okay.
Okay, following is PC eight, PDD twenty-two seven six one zero, zoning amendment in the name of Geiger Ranch LLC. It's for a change in zoning from an M PUD master planning unit development district. uh formerly known as Saran Ranch to AR Agricultural Residential District. It's for a portion of the property totally nine point nine point six one acres, comes here with a recommendation of approval.
All right. And the applicant present? Anyone here to object?
And for the record, we have no one signed up on WebEx to speak on that matter.
Okay.
The following item as far as I know is going to be polled as well. It's PC nine PDD twenty-two seven five nine five. We do have someone who has signed up to speak on the matter.
Okay. So PC nine will be pulled?
Yes. And then we're going to go into the addendum APC 10. This is a variance request PDD 222097 in the name of Michael Rappaport, 7005 Francis Drive. It's for a reduction in the front yard setback from 50 feet to 43 feet in an AR-1 agricultural residential district. Comes here with a recommendation of approval with conditions as included in your agenda packet.
Okay.
Anyone here to object?
And we don't have anyone signed up um to speak on the matter on WebEx.
Denise, I just have one quick question on that. I don't know if it's for you or who it's for, but when these things get submitted to and we don't see these that often, but we this is probably the second or third one I've seen on this board. I mean Something simple like this, would it be easy enough to have Building construction services have them at a table or something on the survey that shows like what's proposed and what's required. So it's an easier check and balance. I mean it's a it's a simple oversight mistake. I get it, but If there's something easier to point it out, I mean it might be worth talking about.
Yeah, I believe there's someone here from Building Construction Services and that person is certainly listening to and hearing what you're saying. Yeah.
Okay.
So it looks like we've pulled from the consent agenda PC five, PC7, and PC9. Right.
Okay, so do I hear a motion on consent?
I move for approval PC two, PC three, PC four, PC six, PC eight.
M PC
ten. Okay. Second. We have a motion uh on the consent agenda and a second. Any further discussion?
It just doesn't include PC two though, right? That that was already approved. That's a continuance? Yeah, PC
two is already approved.
We'll do it again just to
make
a no no.
Everything but P C two. I mean if you want to reapprove PC two, there's probably not
a problem with it,
but
Okay. All right. So any no further discussion. All in favor? Signify by saying aye. Aye. Motion, like sign. Motion carries. Okay.