Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Consent) - CPAL 22-05 Villages L & M - Large-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Future Land Use Map (Maps 2-15 and Sheet 14, 15, 22 and 23) from VMU-3 (VILLAGE MIXED USE TYPE 3) to VMU-2B (VILLAGE MIXED USE TYPE 2B) on approximately 1,773 Acres of Real Property, Located East of Curley Road and North of Zephyrhills Bypass.

56:34real quick, hold on. Sure. We I think we jumped over PC eleven.

56:37Oh we did? Oh very interesting. Okay, so we do have some I apologize. That's right, John. You know you're you're already causing trouble on your first day, John. So we'll get PC eleven set up for you. That's going to be

56:51unless Mr. Hobby was away a little bit.

56:54That will be presented by my other wonderful colleague, um, Shelby uh Fuente, who is online. So we'll get Patty to to bring up the PowerPoint for that item. And uh and you start in a lot of trouble, John.

57:09I promise to be brief.

57:16Okay, Shelby, are you there?

57:20Good afternoon. How are y'all doing today?

57:24Alrighty, for this item then you are going to be sitting as the local planning agency. This is going to be a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment. So see PAL 2205. And this is going to be through the VOPH Villages L and M. This project is located within the central market area. Um, if you want to go to the next slide, please. Um for this amendment then um it is a large scale comprehensive plan amendment to amend the future land use map two-fifteen sheet fourteen fifteen twenty-two

57:55and twenty-three. This will be an amendment from BMU three village mixed use type three to VMU 2B Village Mixed Use Type 2B. This is generally located east of Curley Road and north of the Zephyrhills bypass or just directly west of Zephyrhills. The resolution to this will be to adopt the large-scale plan amendment, amending the corresponding sheets. And there has been two zoning amendments felt concurrently with this. You want to go to the next slide? Long-range

58:27planning does find this to be consistent with both flu 6.5.14B3, which outlines the criteria for type 2B and also Goldflu 6.5.14C for village mixed use type type 3. You don't mind going to next slide? Site is located within the village of Pasadena Hills and this is going to be villages L and M. So those are going to be the two villages um to the southmost boundary of the villages of Pasadena Hills. And

58:58they are um lending the entire area from type three to type two B E. Next slide.

59:08This map right here outlines the different village types. Um so this um these two villages are currently type three. There are three other villages with this type, and that will be amended to type two B. And the intention of this amendment is to kind of allow more flexibility. Um as you can see the core reserve does run through the center of these two villages, essentially separating them. So amending the type from reach a 2B, then the attention is to um to allow a little more flexibility as they develop. Next

59:39slide.

59:43This slide is for the general site locations. This does include both villages L and M. Do you want to go to the next slide, please?

59:54So with B O P H then you technically always have two future land uses going on. You have your underlying future land use, which is the counties. So in this case, it is currently Res One. The applicant has chosen to opt into the villages of Pasagena Hills, and that will be allowing them to opt into that village mixed use type three. So the amendment here is from that res one to activate that um That village type. Do you want to go to the next slide, please?

1:00:22So here then this showcases the um the proposed future land use of the type two B. Excellent.

1:00:33The current zoning app there is a C um post uh comprehensive plan amendment, then they will be um amending the future lane or the zoning category to MPUD. And they currently have two MPUD applications submitted. Next slide.

1:00:51So this is probably the place where you're gonna have the most questions. Um, this is the entitlements for VOPH. For Villages L and M, through this amendment from type 3 to type 2B, there is zero changes in entitlements. So we're not increasing the residential or non-residential. The only difference in the types is type 2B allows for more flexibility in development. Yeah. The intent of this is with type 3 then with the locations of the wetlands

1:01:21and other geographical features, it essentially restricts all development from even achieving those entitlements. So by amending the type, then we're adding that flexibility where they can actually achieve the set entitlements for this. Next slide.

1:01:39So long range planning, we do come with a recommendation for the local planning agency to find the proposed amendment consistent with a comprehensive plan and to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. And just let me know if you have any questions.

1:01:53Okay, thank you.

1:01:55Thank you.

1:01:57Mr. Chairman Mari Hobby, Hobby and Hobby PA 109 Oak Breast Street, Tampa, Florida have been sworn. I there may be questions for Mr. Moody, but I want to dumb this down a little bit for a simpleton like me. The only reason this plan amendment is before you is when we started working on this project, we realized that we think there was an error in the village typology. The financial plan for VOPH and the entitlement chart for VOPH cannot be achieved. Anywhere near

1:02:27for this site with a type 3 village, and that's because in a type 3 you have to have a neighborhood edge, which is not more than two units per acre, on 70% of the entire village. What that would mean on these two DuPew villages is that you'd have over 800 acres in, I'm sorry, 613 acres. In that condition. And by our analysis, which is not final, but our estimates

1:02:57are that we would be roughly 40-41% shy of the planned entitlements at Build Out for these two villages, which is a considerable number of units, about 1,800 units, and that's about a $20 million hit on the VOPH financial plan. So all we're trying to do, keep the same entitlements, but use the uh village two typology, which allows us to have more of a neighborhood general and neighborhood core acreage as opposed to just sprawling area

1:03:27of not more than two units per acre, which is not efficient. Mr. Marie, did you have questions?

1:03:33You just answered it. Other than I have one more. The staff report doesn't say who the petitioner is.

1:03:40It's well, it's we applied on behalf of the DePew Ranch, which is about ninety eight percent of the overall villages, but I think it's it's a plan amendment, so I think staff is treating this as more of a quasi legislative matter. Happy to answer any other questions.

1:03:59Chris, I have a question. So so and I'm sorry what I asked you earlier, but I I didn't get to review it till this morning. So I don't know how long ago and who it was, but two a couple of years ago somebody called me. I don't know if it was from Clearview or somebody.

1:04:16Okay

1:04:17Was it you or somebody else? 'Cause they're asking about schools in in this area. Oh, was it? Okay. I I couldn't remember, sorry. But I thought there was an engineer who called me too. Anyway

1:04:29I I think you've spoken with Mr. Schrader from time to time about it. Yeah,

1:04:33but it wasn't it wasn't Mr. Schrader, but it was somebody. Anyway. Anyway, we talked about it and not that anything's required here. Right. I mean we kinda left it. Open and and so the fact that you're here today, I haven't talked to them since then. So does that mean that's off the table? And again, I'm not sure if you're not going to be able to do that.

1:04:49No, it it's not looking. No, no, we have we have plan we have plans for school sites in village M. I'm it's the westernmost of the two villages.

1:05:01One in the east and one in the larger in the west is okay.

1:05:04Oh perfect. And again, I I when I told the planner, I said, you know, I'm not sure how much we're gonna need and if we need that, but I just wanted to make I would I I'd just like the conversation to be open.

1:05:16Just remember Mr. Schrader and his uh closeness with Mr. Altman. This was this was made aware to us several times over the last few years.

1:05:25Just for the record, Jordan Schrader, Cleveland. design 3010 West of Ziel Street, Suite 150, Tampa, Florida, 336 and 9. I have been sworn. And for the record, Mr. Williams, we are still keeping the same school programming that has in the overall guidance program. One in the east. And then the larger complex in the west, still the northeast quadrant of Curly and Wells Road. Okay. That's still in the plan as we move forward with MPUDs, we'd love to continue working closely with you, access size, and all those components. Perfect,

1:05:52that'd be

1:05:52great.

1:05:52Thank you very much.

1:05:54Okay. Happy to answer anything else.

1:05:56Thank you, man. Anything else? Pete?

1:05:59Good? No. Mr. Hobb, you already answered my question, which is the same one as my colleague here.

1:06:05There's a pile of paperwork to do something fairly simple. I I was out of town for the VOPH advisory committee, but I understand my friends on the committee were totally perplexed by what was being done. It's it's again, we were having to change about three or four different exhibits just to make this one change and make sure that we don't adversely affect any of the Other villages in V OPA.

1:06:30And can I ask a question of staff? And that is are there other proposed villages in the village of Pasadena Hills that may have this same problem so that as we go forward with the update to the comp plan that maybe those can get corrected in the process.

1:06:55I can I can just from the applicant's perspective, we we don't we don't know. We we only ran into this issue when we started to uh analyze this site in detail. Maybe Shelby knows. Shelby?

1:07:09Not that I'm aware of, um, but that would be um something for us to explore, definitely.

1:07:16Thank you.

1:07:18Terry, are you racing up to explain and confirm?

1:07:23Yes, uh Nectarious Pizzos Planning and Development Department. Um each of the villages are uh reviewed separately as MPUDs come in. So MPUDs will begin to update uh the villages as they develop. Um

1:07:40We are currently working on a number of updates. We've updated the uh uh master planning documents for P O P H and these are the only two villages that have been identified for the clarifications that have been discussed today. I've not heard that there are other villages out there that have a similar problem, so But we if we if we find them, we will update them. Uh and then of course the M PUD process uh provides a lot of opportunity there to make any course

1:08:10corrections as well.

1:08:12Okay, great. Very good. Okay, um nothing else. I have a motion.

1:08:17I'll make a motion to approve PC 11, find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan, and approve the proposed amendment. We'll second that.

1:08:26Motion is second. No further discussion. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Motion carries.