An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 18) From RES-9 (Residential-9 du/ga) To RES-24 (Residential-24 du/ga) On Approximately 2.81 Acres Of Real Property Located On The West Side Of Wood Trail Boulevard And North Of Old County Road 54; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionAdopted
Approved to adopt by roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 24, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 24, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 24, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Aug 24, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-22-0364 in full →PDD-22-0364 was taken up 2 times between Jul 21, 2022 and Aug 24, 2022 — this is appearance 2.
- Jul 21, 2022PlanningP4▶No disposition in the minutes
- Aug 24, 2022BoardP67▶Adoptedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 9m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 94% of 63 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay. I know that was a lot of work for you guys. Thank you, Chair.
We have proof of publication of the hearing of this matter in the July 6th, uh, 2022 edition of the Tampa Bay Times.
Item P67 is PDD 220364. It is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for small-scale comprehensive plan amendments to the future land use map, map 2-15 and sheet 18, from Res 9 residential 9 dwelling units per gross acre to res 24 residential 24 dwelling units per gross acre. On approximately 2.81 acres of real property located on the west side of Wood Trail Boulevard and north of Old County Road 54, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for
internal consistency, providing for repealer severability and an effective date. And this comes comes to you with a recommendation of approval and And to adopt the ordinance by roll call vote.
Okay. Board members, any questions on this one? All right, is the applicant here?
In the back.
The applicant's raising their hands in the back, Madam Clerk.
Well did they want to speak?
Done for the recording.
All right, uh this is a public hearing. Does anyone wish to speak on
Madam Clerk staff's not presenting in this?
I I don't know.
You're not presenting this?
That was it?
Okay, did I miss something? I was taking care of something. No.
I think several board members want a presentation. Okay. We can do a presentation.
Maybe a motion to continue? No,
no, no. Because I have no not with that.
Good afternoon. Doreen Roy, Planning and Development.
Item P sixty seven, P D D twenty two zero three six four. Uh the property is located in the West Market area, urban concentration area.
The proposal is to amend the future land use, flu maps two-15, and sheet 18 from Res 9. Two res twenty-four. On it is located on the west side of Wood Trail Boulevard and north of Old County Road 54. The resolution.
nine dwelling units per gross acre and res twenty four residential twenty four dwelling acres per gross acre.
Uh the following policies are consistent with the proposed comprehensive plan. Policy Flu eight point one point one, West Market Area Establishment. Policy flu 1.4.3, transitional land uses, and policy flu 9.1.7, urban service area.
Aerial of the location on the west side of Wood Trail Boulevard and north of Old County Road 54. The existing future land use is res nine.
The proposed future land use is res twenty-four.
Uh the existing zoning districts. Multifamily two, multiple family, high density district.
And staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners find the proposed amendment consistent with the comprehensive plan and adopt by roll call vote.
Okay.
Mm-hmm.
Here's the
applicant's attorney.
Good afternoon again. Barbara Wellhite, 6327 Grand Boulevard for the applicant. The purpose of the amendment from Res 9 to REST 24 is to be able to increase uh by 29 units. Currently the current land use designation of the property allows 38 units and we would we are proposing to go to 67 units. So it's a 29 unit increase. The rezoning currently is MF2. And uh we have a pending rezoning that will come to you, I
think, uh, October 11th, um, to uh MF3.
The it's a very unique site. It's uh I haven't seen very many infill projects. I remember when I spoke to the client the first time he he called me and I said, Well how many wetlands were on site? And he said What? And I said, What? And um he said, I develop in cities. I develop in LA. We don't have wetlands. So to have a developer who has a vision for a property In an area that that without infill investment
will continue to blight. There is existing commercial strips to the north, a couple of them. Really good Mexican restaurant to the north and carmelitas. Oh yeah. But um but and this kind of investment will change the area. Undercapacity schools. 54, that section of Old 54 is still an arterial roadway. Really interesting is our bus stops. We have a bus stop to the uh east. Um on fift on Little Road. There's
a s what's called a future express service bus service and superstop location is planned in the vicinity of 54 and Little, which is within a walking or biking distance to the south. Um so that's kind of unique. It's within your Spring District, the Harbors West Market Redevelopment and Infill Plan District. And I can answer any questions. We have um there's a notice on this on the on the property. Letters have gone out to neighbors. My
condos my client has worked with the condo association that is tucked up to the to the north of this piece of property, and uh we'd ask for your support. Thank you.
Okay.
So anyone um here who wishes to speak to this item?
We have no one signed up nor online for this item.
Madam Chair? Um Barbara, could I ask your question? It was probably a few months ago we looked at this. Um We talked about a few different accesses or w whatever. Did you make it give a site plan or any sort?
We don't have one with us today because we're at land use. We will be back for rezoning on the eleventh and can certainly bring a presentation of regarding the specifics at that time.
Okay, thanks.
Okay, okay.
Mm-hmm.
Okay, then um if there's no further questions, we'll lose Jack, is this your district or Christina, this is yours? This is mine.
I guess we can assume what it's gonna be, but I can't make that assumption at this time. But I would assume But I won't make an assumption, but We do want to go to Res twenty four.
Yeah, but we'll wait for the next turn.
Okay, so
Public element?
I did. I took public comment and there was nobody. So I just need a motion.
Motion to approve.
Is there a second?
Why won't we have additional information?
Oh he
can't hear.
When will we have the additional information on the site plan?
So I think Ms. Wilhite said that that even though it is a Euclidean straight zoning that she's coming back with, she would that they would be willing to discuss a site plan at that hearing. For zoning.
Okay.
Second.
Okay, um it is a roll call vote.
District One Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Moore. District four Commissioner Fitzpatrick. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District three, Chairman Starkey.
Aye.