An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Small-Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2-15 And Sheet 15) From RES-6 (Residential-6 Du/Ga) And RES-9 (Residential-9 Du/Ga) To RES-9 (Residential-9 Du/Ga) On Approximately 12.63 Acres (M.O.L.) Of Real Property Located Off Clinton Avenue Approximately A Quarter Of A Mile West Of U.S. Highway 301; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date

9:04All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? By gloss script. Mm-hmm. Next item, P54.

9:13Yes, sir.

9:15Um

9:15You want publication?

9:17Yes.

9:18All right, P fifty four is published in the Tampa Bay Times January fourth, twenty twenty three.

9:24P uh P 54 is P D D 230089. On this item, this is the adoption. We're asking you to approve the item by roll call vote, accept public comment, of course. This is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan, providing for a small-scale comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two-fifteen and sheet 15 from res six, residential six dwelling units per gross acre, and res nine residential nine. Dwelling units per gross acre to res nine residential nine dwelling units per gross acre on approximately 12.63 acres

9:55more or less of real property located off Clinton Avenue, approximately a quarter mile. West of U.S. Highway 301, providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for a repealer, severability, and an effective date. This item comes to you with a recommendation that you adopt by roll call vote. It was presented to a local planning agency on January 19, 2023, who found the ordinance consistent with the Uh comprehensive plan and recommended approval to the Board of County Commissioners.

10:25Okay, thank you. Any questions for staff?

10:27Yes.

10:28Mr. Starkey.

10:29Um is this on the north or the south side? This is on the north side. So this is the area where we have an issue with The missing multi-use trail?

10:42Mm.

10:43Is the person um that is responsible for this item here today.

10:51Doreen I think it's Doreen Roy's item.

10:58Bye, Andrew. Good afternoon, Doreen Roy, Planning and Development. Uh yes, there is a trail uh on Clinton Avenue. And I d I'm not sure if it's running on the south side or the north side. And that's a problem?

11:12No offense? Um this is one of the major major multi-use trails in the county and once again the Planning Commission's not picking this up. Planners aren't picking this up. So this is where we made a mistake and we put a sidewalk in instead of the multi-use path. And as we talked to D O T when we were out at the ribbon cutting They're gonna find a way to get it back on here. And so I'm not okay with us not realizing

11:43this. I'm not. I mean we need six more feet. What?

11:49This is not the part that's in construction.

11:52This didn't get widened?

11:53Clinton Avenue closer to 301.

11:55Doesn't Clinton Avenue go all the way to 301? The widening?

11:58Yeah, I understand.

12:04From Prospect to 301. Um It's missing and they figured out the part and I think I showed it to you, Commissioner, when we were out there where they're gonna be able to Build the multi use trailer. Uh on the near the sidewalk, but once they get Uh somewhere uh to the east of that and I don't remember where the definitor was Uh Yeah. We have to bring back we have to get the land.

12:33So if I'm not mistaken, yeah, this is this would be part of that countywide solution that we're working with F D O T on uh versus necessarily this particular project. Yeah.

12:45So what what are you saying?

12:47Well what I'm saying is is we recognize there was a miss, right, with with the fifty-two extension. Um and as part of that we are working with F Dot and we we had that conversation um at at the ribbon cutting. Uh on finding a way to get an extended trail through there. I don't think that this development necessarily, even looking at the very minimal frontage it has, is is really gonna be a major player and part of this.

13:09Well, I'll tell you what we need, and what I'm gonna need to vote for it is we need six feet from the front.

13:13That's a comprehensive plan amendment.

13:16Okay, but I wanna see if that is the applicant here and are they I mean it's to their advantage to have this go in front of their property. But we need six feet.

13:28Uh Mr. Chairman Mariano Speethos Planning and Development Um I believe that when this project does come through with its zoning They'll they'll dedicate the necessary right-of-way as outlined in the right-of-way preservation tables to accommodate the necessary um infrastructure that's gonna be within that right-of-way.

13:45Okay. I just want to be sure, Terry, that every one of your staff know that I mean I think we need to put some red flags on certain properties that we need an additional six feet. That's what DOT told me. When we were out there. Um maybe you need to talk to them or Tina or someone, but We don't want to We don't want to um mess up um the opportunity. So just

14:11Understood and w we're aware of the the fifty two trail issue.

14:15Okay.

14:18Okay. Any other comments for staff?

14:24Terry is here. Is the applicant here? Terry? Terry, is the applicant here?

14:31It yeah, there's Sh sh Shelley May Johnson.

14:38Thank you, Shelley Johnson, [address removed]. Um yeah, I did hear the conversation. They have to come back in for site plan approval, but obviously that should be triggered at that time. I don't think it's gonna be an issue, so But thank you for consideration today. Thanks.

14:52Thank you. Okay, there's a public hearing. Anyone from the public like to speak on this item? Mm-hmm.

15:01I do not have anyone signed up. Any

15:03on WebEx?

15:04No.

15:04Okay. So we should approval?

15:06Second.

15:08Uh roll call vote?

15:09Okay. District one, Commissioner Oakley. Aye. District two, Commissioner Weightman.

15:14Yes.

15:15District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. District five, Chairman Mariano.