Zoning Amendment (Consent) - 4G Ranch West MPUD - 4G Ranch LLC - A Petition for a Rezoning from MPUD Master Planned Unit Development and A-C Agricultural District to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of 1500 Single Family Detached Residential Units on Approximately 1,102 Acres Located North of S.R. 52, 3.19 Miles East of U.S. Highway 41

28:20No, yeah, we'll do it we'll do it the end of the year. Yeah. Yeah, so that's that'll s yeah. We'll do fifty-four right before we do sixty-eight. So do them back to back.

28:30Okay, I apologize. All right. So uh P fifty eight. Is uh do you need that did you have state the advertising as

28:40I did not, thank you Denise. So P fifty eight was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on June twenty first, twenty twenty three and by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

28:49P fifty eight is P D D twenty three seven six six one. It's four G Ranch West MPUD, four G Ranch L L C. It's for rezoning from MPUD and AC to MPUD to allow for the development of 1,500 single family detached resident single-family detached residential units. Um I think it should say single-family residential units on approximately 1,102 acres, and it's located on the north. Site of 52, 3.19 miles east of US 41. The item comes to you with a recommendation

29:19of approval with conditions with some changes that were made by the Planning Commission, which include the change of the front structure setback for three different product types, which include the villas, the detached A product, and the detached B product, and also a new condition that basically limits. the number of townhomes to a total of 200 that has been sent to the clerk's office to and to each individual commissioner. We ask that you approve the item with conditions as included in your revised conditions in

29:50your packet.

29:51Okay. I have one spoke question. Uh Commissioner Starkey.

29:54Um just thinking about what you just said, if they chose to do rear loaded product, would that setback preclude them from being able to do rear loaded? And should we I dun I don't know if they have any plans but I wouldn't wanna keep them from doing that because of that set that language. Maybe we could add it to it just in case. If that's okay with them.

30:22'Cause you said there was a condition of a setback.

30:25Yeah, the setback has to do with the front primary setback. Those setbacks, um, the Planning Commission requested that, for example, the single-family attached villa had a 10-foot primary setback. They asked that it be 15 feet. So that was changed, and it was also changed for single-family detached product A and single family detached product B. So that wouldn't be for the town hall. The town home remains the same. So is there

30:52I wouldn't I wouldn't wanna preclude them if they wanted to to do rear loaded. So um I can we just say Clark, what's a sentence that just says if if they do rear loaded, those setbacks don't apply?

31:07Clark Hobby, Hobby and Hobby, PA one hundred nine North Brussel Street have been sworn. Uh I'm sorry, Tampa, Florida have been sworn. Uh we this only applies to certain front loaded product, Commissioner Shah, I don't think your concern is that you're not gonna affect it in any event. So

31:25if you wanted to do rear loaded and not have those setbacks you're

31:28those setbacks only apply to certain

31:31if it's a front loaded product it must be correct. Okay.

31:35Thank

31:35you. Commissioner Weightman.

31:38Mr. Harvey.

31:40Just want to confirm that the townhomes are fee sample.

31:43That's correct. Okay. We have the new condition and they're requiring flat. Thank you.

31:49Okay. Any other questions for staff?

31:57It's on consent. So is there

31:58anybody who

31:59wishes to object to this item?

32:01Anyone wishing to object to item P fifty eight? Leave it on consent. Item P fifty nine.

32:08Okay, P fifty nine was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on May twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-three.

32:14P59 is PDD 237680's zoning amendment, Carlos Alberto, Ramirez Padua, and Lara Garcia Santiago for a change in zoning from a C2 general commercial district to an AR agricultural residential district. Comes here with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

32:32Okay. Is anyone objecting to item P fifty nine? Do you know what could say?

32:40Um item P sixty.

32:42Advertising the Tampa Bay Times on May twenty fourth, twenty twenty three.

32:46That's PDD 237684 zoning amendment in the name of Sarah Gurley Trust, Max L and Sarah Sarah C. Gurley Co-Trustees for a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential district to a C2 General Commercial District. Comes to you with a rec recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

33:04Anyone here objecting to item P sixty? Seeing no one move non consent.

33:10Do we do we have anybody representing this item?

33:13Yes, it's Peter Pensa.

33:17Uh representing the item. I thought you asked representing the item. Peter Penny.

33:22With Um with avid, I believe. Well the moving to a seat to seat tube zoning I'm just gonna stick with my theme here. Uh to protect this zoning from the Live Local Act. So I wanna confirm that there are conditions.

33:37I apologize. I should have stol told you that uh let's see. See if they agree to a deed restrictions.

33:53I I don't see that they agreed to a deed restriction, but I do want to say that um I'm fairly sure that this one has already submitted a pre application meeting for a commercial development there.

34:06But there's not being a confirmed heat respect now move to continue this item until we can confirm.

34:10Uh is the applicant here?

34:12I believe the applicant should be on WebEx. I had to pull this one.

34:18Try to do this real quick.

34:20We'll have to pull this, I guess, and

34:23let me see if we can get a WebEx real quick.

34:25I don't think is he on WebEx? Eric. Yeah.

34:32Peter Pensa. I'm Peter. He's here.

34:35Peter Penny says he's here. Peter?

34:38Yeah.

34:39All right. So uh Commissioner Weightman would like to have a restriction on here, a deed restriction. Uh did you hear?

34:47Yeah, so if I understood that would be a deed restriction to not allow residential development?

34:52Correct. Then we'd be fine with that.

34:56And Mr Pensa, can you give your name and address for the record and state if you've been sworn?

35:01Yes, my name is Peter Pensa. I'm an AI C P certified planner with Avid Group, and I have been

35:08You have not been smorn or you have? You have. Okay, thank you. Because you

35:12don't have any

35:13Can I ask you a question?

35:15All right.

35:18Commissioner Starkey, go

35:19ahead. So uh I don't I haven't looked to see where exactly this area is. Um but you know I'm a proponent of mixed use and there are some good there are times when it's good to have residential above commercial or retail. And so I think what we don't want is is a Uh someone coming in C2 doing a uh Workforce housing multi-family project. But

35:50I can we just keep keep it to that and and who knows, maybe he wants to live above where he works. I mean I wouldn't wanna take that away, so Is there a way to word that? So we just don't get what we want? What we we get what we don't want. We don't get what we don't want. So

36:05definitely. So at the moment I think we're gonna have to continue this item anyway. Uh talking to the county attorney just said we need the deed restriction in place, so we can't approve it today anyway.

36:14If they're doing a voluntary deed restriction, you don't have the deed restriction before you, so this would have to be continued to your August eighth meeting.

36:21Okay. So if you want to reach out to the applicant you can have that conversation. We'll put we'll go for that uh motion to go forward. So we're gonna pull item P sixty and we'll continue it to

36:31Well why don't you just pull just pull it poll sixty for right now and continue with your consent agenda since that's

36:40P sixty one was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on May twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-three.

36:46PDD twenty three seven six nine three Clyde A. Bestone Buckman Highway for a change in zoning from AR Agricultural Residential District to a C2 General Commercial District. This does have a voluntarily agreed upon deed restriction that it will be used for C2 employment generating uses.

37:03Okay. Anyone here to object to item P sixty one? Seeing no one leave it on consent? Item P sixty two.

37:11P-62 was advertised in the Tampa Bay Times on May 24, 2023.

37:17That's PDV 237714 in the name of Jeffrey S and Lydia Lydia Curtis for a change in zoning from an AR agricultural residential district to an R1MH single family mobile home district comes here with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Development Department and the Planning Commission.

37:33Okay. Is there anyone in opposition to P sixty two?

37:37We'll leave it on consent. We have a motion to approve the consent agenda.

37:41So moved.

37:42Second. Does that include the revisions on BC?

37:44No, we're gonna pull that. Okay, good. Uh all in favor say aye. Oh no. Roll call book, sorry. Roll call.

37:49All right, District One, Commissioner Oakley.

37:51Aye.

37:51District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District three, Commissioner Starkey. Aye. District four, Commissioner Bradford. Aye. District 5, Chairman Mariano.