Zoning Amendment (Continuance) - Crossways MPUD - Crossways 301 LLC - A Petition for a Rezoning From an A-C Agricultural Zoning District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow the Development of up to 176 Single Family Residential Units on Approximately 29.5 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Continuance Requested
No disposition in the minutes
The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Dec 7, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Dec 7, 2023
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDD-24-7683 in full →PDD-24-7683 was taken up 5 times between Nov 2, 2023 and Feb 8, 2024, continued 2 times — this is appearance 3.
- Nov 2, 2023PlanningPC2▶No disposition in the minutes
- Nov 14, 2023BoardP96Continued
- Dec 7, 2023PlanningPC3▶No disposition in the minutesthis item
- Jan 9, 2024BoardP60▶Continued
- Feb 8, 2024PlanningPC2▶No disposition in the minutes
No appearance of this case has a final disposition in the minutes. It was continued, or the minutes do not dispose of it in writing — which is true for 24% of items.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 75% of 12 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Next item is PC three PD D twenty four seven six eight three. It's a zoning amendment, crossways MPUD. The requested to continue the item to the fed February eighth, twenty twenty-four planning commission meeting at one thirty in date sitting.
Is that a staff or an applicant requested continuance?
Um this is a maybe my team can assist me with that. I believe it is an applicant requested continuance.
Trying to figure out what the delay is. We had the The project came down to one question and that was whether or not the applicant would agree to connect to utilities. I'm Shocked that it takes this long to make that decision.
Oh. Afternoon Plan Commission, Jacob Gates, Planner 2. I'm the planner on this project. That is an applicant-initiated continuance. They're exploring their options to determine if they can connect to the utilities, the cost of connecting utilities, or if they would be willing to reduce the number of units to allow for well and septic. and explore that as an option. They would
have to reduce the number of units to if If they wanted to have septic Exactly.
Uh I mean I guess we can continue this but I'm not understanding why the difficulty in making that decision.
They're I believe they're considering their options in terms of cost.
All right, thank you. Is the applicant present?
Okay. And there's nobody else here to speak on this item? Mm. Okay, so we need a motion?
Motion to continue to February eighth, date city. Second.
Motion a second. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed. Motion carries.