Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Orange State MPUD Master Planned Unit Development - Orange State Enterprises, Inc. – A Substantial Modification to the Approved Orange State MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow the Development of 11 Townhomes on Approximately 3.07 Acres
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
OutcomeApproved
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P60, P61, P62, P63, and P64.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, May 7, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, May 7, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PEG-24-7737 in full →PEG-24-7737 was taken up 3 times between Feb 20, 2024 and May 7, 2024, continued 2 times. This is appearance 3.
- Feb 20, 2024BoardP47▶Continued
- Apr 10, 2024BoardP47▶Continued
- May 7, 2024BoardP60▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
P
sixty.
P sixty.
Which one? Sixty?
Yes, sir.
Okay.
So item P sixty was published in the Tampe Times on February twenty-first, twenty twenty four, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site posting. The item was continued from the January 9, 2024 BCC meeting to the February 20th, 2024 BCC meeting, where it was continued to today.
Item P60 is PEG 247737, zoning amendments, Orange State MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development, Orange State Orange State Enterprises, Inc. It's a substantial modification to the approved Orange State MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development to allow the development of 11 townhomes on approximately 3.07 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planet. Planning Commission and the Planning and Economic Growth Department. There was a an issue with the proof of publication,
but we provided that to the clerk's office prior to the meeting. Yesterday we provided it yesterday.
Okay. Does anyone in the audience wish to speak against this item?
Mr.
Chairman I
have no one signed up and no one on WebEx.
Okay. See you no one? Leave that on consent agenda and move on to P61.