Zoning Amendment (Consent) - KD-52 MPUD Master Planned Unit Development – Mulandco Liquidating Company LLC Et Al. – Rezoning Request from A-C Agricultural District, R-1MH Single Family/Mobile Home District, and
What the county recorded
DispositionApproved
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda items P60, P61, P62, P63, and P64.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, May 7, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, May 7, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 6 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Item P sixty three was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March sixth, twenty twenty-four, and by affidavit of certified mailings and site posting. The item was continued from the April 10th, 2024, BCC meeting to today.
Item P63 is PEG 247712. On this item, there are several ex-party communications that have been already provided to the clerk's office. Two from Commissioner Starkey, one from Commissioner Mariano, one from Commissioner Oakley, one from Commissioner Weightman, and then there's also ex-parte communications from all Planning Commission members. Again, it's PEG 247712. It's a zoning amendment. KD 15. MPUD Master Plan Unit Development, Muland Co. Liquidating Company LLC, and others. It's for
rezoning requests from AC Agricultural R1, MH Single Family Mobile Home, and C2 General Commercial Districts to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development District to allow for the development of 190,000 square feet of retail commercial, 3 million square feet of light industrial, 500,000 square Square feet of office, a two hundred and fifty room hotel Or 250 rooms of hotel, 1,550 square feet multifamily apartments, 150 townhomes, 600 single-family
homes, 27 single-family estate homes, and associated infrastructure on approximately 785 acres. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planning Commission and the Planning and Economic Growth Department. Yeah. Um and the appro and the conditions are as included in your agenda packet.
Okay. Is anyone here to speak against this item?
Seeing no one, it remains on consent. Move on to P64.