Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
PC2No disposition in the minutesPublic hearingPublished agenda

Zoning Amendment (Continuance) - 301 East MPUD – 301 East LLC– Rezoning Request from RMH Residential Mobile Home and C-2 General Commercial Zoning District to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow for the Development of 200 Townhomes and 36,000 Square Feet of Commercial on Approximately 29.01 Acres Located in the East Market Area

PEG-24-7764District 1

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Continuance Requested

No disposition in the minutes

The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Aug 22, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Aug 22, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PEG-24-7764 in full →

PEG-24-7764 was taken up 2 times between Jul 9, 2024 and Aug 22, 2024, continued 1 time — this is appearance 2.

  1. Jul 9, 2024BoardP55Continued
  2. Aug 22, 2024PlanningPC2No disposition in the minutesthis item

No appearance of this case has a final disposition in the minutes. It was continued, or the minutes do not dispose of it in writing — which is true for 24% of items.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 38% of 8 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Unidentified speakerVoice A

Okay. Uh and I'm gonna back step here slightly. I don't know if I introduced myself, I think that's important. Yeah, gotcha. Uh Patrick Dutter, um Planning Sur Assistant Planning Services Director. Thank you. Okay, uh on to PC two. Um PC two and PC three are related. Um so PC two is the zoning amendment. It's a continuance for 301 East MPUD, 301 East LLC rezoning request from RMH Residential Mobile Home District and C2 General

Commercial Zoning District to MPD Master Plan Unit Development to allow for the development of 200 townhomes and 36. Um thousand square feet of commercial on approximately twenty-nine point zero one acres located in the East Market area. Uh recommended committee action is approve the continuance request to the nine five twenty-four planning commission in Dade City. Okay. Um And that's connected with the PC three as well. PC three. Would you like me to read PC three now? Mm-hmm. PC three is the Comprehensive

Plan Amendment that supports the MPUD. Uh so it's Comprehensive Plan Amendment Continuance, uh C Pass 2314, uh 301 East providing for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to the future land use map. 2-5 and Sheets 23, changing from COM commercial to PD Plan Development on approximately 29.01 acres of real property located east of US 301 at the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of US 301, which is Gall Boulevard, and Roanoke Riverway. And a

text amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.77-301 easement. East and a map amendment to the future land use map two nine, adding sub area map two nine seventy seven uh three hundred one east. And this recommendation is also continuance to the September fifth LPA public hearing at one thirty in Dade City.

GreyChair

All right. So uh do I have a motion on the can both in continuances, please? Move to continue PC two and PC three to the September fifth. Reading. Second. Second. We have a motion and a second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like sign. Motion carries.

Five

Unidentified speakerVoice A

back to Portugal, huh?

Christopher Poole

Mm-hmm.