An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2- 15 And Sheet 12) From RES-3 (Residential - 3 Du/Ga) And AG (Agricultural) To PD (Planned Development) On Approximately 100.8 Acres Of Real Property Located At The Southeast Intersection Of US 41 And Leland Avenue And 1.1 Miles North Of S.R. 52; And A Text Amendment Creating Subarea Policy Flu 7.1.72 – Fletcher; And A Map Amendment To The Future Land Use Map 2-9 Adding Subarea Map 2-9(72) Fletcher; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.

1:02Second. Is it a time certain? No. No time certain? Okay. I got a motion of second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Motion pass 5-0. Move on to P 50. We

1:15have proof of publication and uh affidavit of certified mailings in the times on August the seventh, 2024, and by certified mailings. Inside poster.

1:30Item P 50 is PDE 240024. This is an ordinance amending the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, Map 2-15 and Sheet 12 from Res 3, residential three-dwelling units per gross acre, and AG, agricultural, to PD plan development on approximately 100.8 acres of real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of US 41 and Leland Avenue. And w one point one miles north of State Road fifty two in a text amendment creating sub area policy flu seven

2:00one seven two Fletcher and a map amendment to the future land use map two dash nine adding sub area map two dash nine and seventy two Fletcher and adding and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repealer servability and effective date. This comes with a recommendation to approve the Or adopt the comprehensive plan amendment uh and uh approve it by uh approve your name, I will call folks. And

2:25we have a presentation at this point. I'm I don't know about you guys, I'm having a hard time hearing.

2:28Yeah, it's hard to hear you there. Mm chairman, I'm receiving a couple of emails from folks that they're having issues hearing as well. Okay,

2:36watch

2:37it online.

2:37Go ahead.

2:39Test, test.

2:40We can't hear you. Somebody needs to turn that up. The end up. Or or put the end up. Yeah. Yeah.

2:59Ordinance abending the Tassel County Comprehensive Plan providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map, map two dash fifteen and sheet twelve from Res three, residential three dwelling in this part of Gross Acre and AG Agricultural to P D Plan Development on a project. Approximately 100.8 acres of real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of US 41 and Leland Avenue and 1.1 miles north of State Road 52, and a text amendment creating sub-area policy flu 7.1.72 Fletcher and a map amendment to

3:29the future Land News Map 2-9, adding sub-area map 2-9-72 Fletcher and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal. Consistency providing for repealer serverability and effective date. This comes to you with a recommendation to approve the proposed comp plan amendment and adopt the ordinance by roll call vote. And there's a presentation if desired.

3:50Finally.

3:51Um yeah. I think we need presentation.

3:54Agree. Yeah, agree.

3:57But I'm waiting um Okay, something's

4:02That's item

4:02P

4:03fifty. So what's what's the issue is this for the right-of-way.

4:09This one that that the land that one was P forty nine, so something's wrong in Right?

4:16Yes.

4:17Forty-nine was the land, was the tree.

4:20You're right.

4:24So I don't know what's going on up there. But maybe go to P51.

4:36That's correct. Thanks.

4:40So maybe so what's the next one? What do you have? Wait,

4:43hold on a second.

4:43There you go.

4:45That's a that's the memo number is correct and The description.

4:56So I think if we go to the next slide, and that's the ordinance title. Okay. Yes. Okay. That's right.

5:06So this is it?

5:07Yes.

5:11So this is the location of the subject property in the central market area. This is generally northeast corner of US 41 and 52, just on the north and west side of Pilot Country Airport. The proposal is a comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use from Res 3, residential free drawing use for gross acre and AG Agricultural, to Plan development. PD plan development. And the purpose is to allow for 160 townhomes, 350

5:41multifamily, and 100,000 square feet of commercial and approximately 100.80 acres. The location, as I noted previously, was on the northeast corner of the intersection of US 41 and Leland, which is generally the uh northeast uh corner of US 41 and 52 as we'll see on the next slide here. So 52 and 41 is just off the slide to the south. And the subject property is outlined on the west side and north side of Pilot Country Airport

6:12right here.

6:15And there's the intersection that we've been I've been noting, 52 and 41. There are a number of trails that surround the subject site, crossbar access south trail, which runs along US 41, and then of course the Stable 52 Trail down south along 52.

6:34Uh this is uh the wetland scenario that we're contending with in terms of developing the 100 or so acres.

6:43And this is indicating the proximity of the subject site within the pilot country airport zone. And as I noted, there are portions of the Fletcher sub-area within the RPZ of the airport zone. These are the other MPUDs within the area. On the west side, we have Talavera. Longleaf Grove MPUD is just to the south. This was approved recently, maybe

7:13a year and a half or so ago. And then Sandridge and Tibbetts. These were also recent MPUDs that were approved or reapproved a couple months ago in this area.

7:27These are the entitlements that surround the Fletcher subject site. As noted, 160 townhomes, 350 multifamily, 100,000 commercial on the subject. In Talavera, there are approximately 800 single-family homes. Enterprise Commerce Park has 235,000 non-residentials, 235,000 square feet of non-residential, 200,000 square feet of heavy industrial, 35,000 commercial. So the Longleaf Grove MPUD has 1,607 residential entitlements built into it, not

7:57yet constructed, 126,000 square feet of non-residential, and those are the immediate surrounding entitlements to this MPUD. Uh this is a conceptual of the sub-area. Uh the Planning Development Economic Growth Department worked with the state, with the uh property owners and the and the developers to come up with a conceptual plan that would illustrate the type of commercial development uh we could expect both on this block here and

8:27then if multifamily does not happen also on this block.

8:35Additionally, some other design features that we incorporated into the discussions was the rearloading of townhomes and how that might be accommodated if townhomes were to be established in other parts of the MPUD that were interior to that development. All of that information is taken care of within the MPUD later on the agenda.

8:57Mr. Chairman Mariano. Okay, can you just go back to the slide for a minute? Yes. So along 41, the northern part of it You've got those boxes that are the darker red that's where the multifilmy can go? Yes. And down below it's a little bit lighter of a color. And that's where the commercial or multi-family could go?

9:18Yes.

9:19Okay. Thank you.

9:23Uh this is the existing future land use of the area with the Res 3 on the western portion of the property and the AG on the eastern portion of the property, sort of at the end of the uh pilot country runway. This is the new future land use, PD plan development being applied to the site. Uh these are the objectives and policies that uh come inform this project to the comprehensive plan. And then as noted we recommend to

9:53the Board of County Commissioners that you find the proposed amendment consistent with the Capita Plan adopt the ordinance by vote call vote.

10:01Mr. Chairman Mariano. Yes. Um so this is just a comp plan amendment change?

10:14I just want to make sure that site plan is binding, first of all. Did a lot of work on that site plan. Um and then the next question I have is um if you could go back to it and maybe I'm sorry.

10:31but I haven't gone back to it yet. But this issue came up on our phone call today. That I that what what is gonna be in front of this project along 40 way? Is it the sidewalk or multi use trail? Or or uh multi modal trail? Path, whatever?

10:51'Cause when I looked there I don't I can't tell if there's anything there.

10:58Mr. Chairman? Last question? Mr. I was gonna suggest we actually listen to before we vote on this. Let's go do P fifty eight and go through and then you can all get all the technic questions up. Yeah. We can do