Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P70No disposition in the minutesPublic hearingPublished agenda

Zoning Amendment (Consent) – Residences at Rolling Hills MPUD Master Planned Unit Development - Dan-Nico Properties, LLC – A Rezoning Petition from MF-1 Multi-Family Medium Density District to an MPUD Master Planned Unit Development to Allow 132 Multi-Family Units, 104 Senior Units, 3,600 Square Feet of Medical Offices and a Minimum of 3,000 Square Feet of Retail Uses on Approximately 9.87 Acres, Located on the Southwest Corner of the Little Road and Denton Avenue Intersection

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.PDE-24-7740District 5

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approval with Conditions

No disposition in the minutes

The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 17, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 17, 2024

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PDE-24-7740 in full →

Heard once. PDE-24-7740 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Sep 17, 2024BoardP70No disposition in the minutesthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 82% of 38 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →

Taken up 2 times, not once through — set aside and returned to. Each stretch is below, in the order it happened.

1/2Taken up at Session 1, 4:04:42

Ron OakleyChair

Got a motion and second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Motion passed. Uh to be continued. Uh P seventy. And this is our first consent item.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Proof of publication in the Tampa Bay Times, uh July tenth of twenty twenty four, supplemented by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

Denise

Item P70 is PDE 247740. It's a zoning amendment in the name of residences at Rolling Hills, MPUD, Master Plan Unit Development, Dan Nico Properties LLC. It's for a rezoning from MF1 Multiple Family Medium Density District to an MPUD Master Plan Unit Development to allow a total of 132 multifamily units, 104 senior units. 3,600 square feet of medical office, and a minimum of 3,000 square feet of retail on approximately

9.87 acres. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions from the Planning Commission and the Planning Development and Economic Growth Department. Specifically, there are conditions 46 and 47 that deal with the land use. And zoning exemptions or preemptions, sorry, in the LIVE LOCOL Act, and also the Ad Valorian tax exemp uh preemptions in the Live Local Act. I have a question on this.

All

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

right.

Ron OakleyChair

Go to the next item.

2/2Taken up again at Session 1, 4:08:58

Ron OakleyChair

Ms. Starkey.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Um just that in talking with staff on this one, they worked very hard on this site plan. And um I just wanna No. How we make this site plan either binding or very close to binding? And this is something that we have to be careful about 'cause we see We work hard to get a good design and then that isn't what gets built 'cause it wasn't binding. So How d how do we do that?

And maybe it's in the conditions of approval, but I d I don't think they are in my conversation with staff.

Ron OakleyChair

Mr. Peters.

Ron OakleyChair

Uh Niktarius Pito's playing development economic growth. Um this particular concept plan is being controlled by its dimensional standards.

Chairman

Yeah.

Ron OakleyChair

Uh so Uh typically there's a condition of approval that's built into the uh into this project. Uh our code places a 150-foot setback on industrial property when it's adjacent to residential development. Uh in this particular project we've worked to split the difference and establish seventy-five feet of that 150 foot setback on the residential property. That would mean that Uh parking has to occur between their building

uh that their their westernmost buildings and the westernmost property line, which pushes their buildings to the east. Which then forces them to have the buildings up along the street.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Well I'm I'm fine with that along the street. I mean Don't we want that?

Ron OakleyChair

Yes. So this is very near to a uh uh a binding concept plan based on the dimensional criteria that are built into the conditions of approval. Uh if you want further Um uh

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

See um that red dotted line, that's a pedestrian

Ron OakleyChair

Yes. Those are the the pedestrian networks within the property.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Okay, and those are binding?

Ron OakleyChair

Yes.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Okay, and um then we have access, potential future access to whatever comes south. And we have uh connection to the east. Over on the right hand side and a cross access on the southwestern corner there. That stays.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Yes.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Okay, then

Unidentified speakerVoice B

I'm okay. Mr. Chairman, so what would be the problem with adding a condition that says that the that the PDP slash P S P that's submitted shall be in substantial accord with a conceptual plan submitted with this rezoning.

Ron OakleyChair

Right, that's what I was gonna say. If you wanted to add a condition to say that, we could add that. Okay. Absolutely.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Yeah.

Ron OakleyChair

All right,

Ron OakleyChair

pleasure of the board.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Uh make that motion with the conditional public comment

Ron OakleyChair

to public comment. Does anyone here speak uh Against this item? Well it's off a control item.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

And by which

we're not going to be able to

Unidentified speaker

Oh, looky here. Good afternoon, Justina Gale, two hundred forward planning and design, two hundred Pine Winds Boulevard. We're okay with the condition.

Ron OakleyChair

Okay. Move or pull with the binding condition?

Unidentified speaker

Second.

Ron OakleyChair

I got a motion second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Motion passed. Five zero.

Kathryn StarkeyVice Chair

Thank you.