An Ordinance Amending The Pasco County Comprehensive Plan; Providing For A Comprehensive Plan Amendment To The Future Land Use Map (Map 2- 15 And Sheet 22) From RES-6 (Residential 6 – Du/Ga) To COM (Commercial) On Approximately 0.94 Acres Of Real Property Located At Southeast Corner Of The Intersection Of Veridian Way And SR 54; And Providing For Additional Text Amendments As Necessary For Internal Consistency; Providing For A Repealer, Severability, And An Effective Date.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionApproved
Approved as part of the Public Hearing Consent Agenda.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 14, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 14, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PDE-25-0047 in full →PDE-25-0047 was taken up 2 times between Dec 12, 2024 and Jan 14, 2025 — this is appearance 2.
- Dec 12, 2024PlanningPC10Approved
- Jan 14, 2025BoardP58▶Approvedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 9 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Aye. P fifty eight.
358, we have proof of publication of the Tampa Bay Times and edition of November 27, 2024, supplemented by an affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Item P fifty-eight is PDE twenty five zero zero four seven. This is an ordinance amending of the Pasco County comprehensive plan providing for a comprehensive plan amendment to the future land use map map two-fifteen and sheet twenty-two from RAS six, residential six dwelling in this persecret to Comm Commercial on approximately point nine four acre of real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Viridian Way and State Road 54. And providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency, providing for repeal observability in an effective date. This comes to you with a
recommendation to uh adopt the ordinance and by roll call and there is a presentation if necess if desired.
I don't need one, but does anyone else need one? Okay. Um Is there anyone here to speak against this ordinance?
The only person we show online is appears to be representative of the applicants.
All right. Um seeing no opposition, I take a motion. Move for second. Roll call?
District one, Commissioner Oakley. District two, Commissioner Weightman. Aye. District four, Commissioner Yeager. District five, Commissioner Mariano. Aye. District three, Chairman Stark.
Aye. And P fifty nine.