Zoning Amendment (Consent) - Old Pasco Road MPUD – SAV PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC – Rezoning Request from A-R Agricultural Residential and A- C Agricultural to MPUD Master Planned Unit Development District to Allow for the Development of 106 Townhomes and Associated Infrastructure on Approximately 18.36 Acres Located in Central Pasco County

1:55:57Item P forty six was published in the Tampa Bay Times on March 19, 2025, and affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.

1:56:05I think the only reason that this came off of consent was to add an additional condition. Um I would propose uh we've got some standard language that we that we use and some of the MPUDs. A disclosure statement shall be included in all sales contracts or other disclosure materials for residential sales within the MPOD regarding the east-west road, and it will be it that it will be interconnected to the parcel to the east.

1:56:36Is there a real soft one too?

1:56:39So the one to the south is an emergency access. We can

1:56:43Oh. The one two Well eventually it may not be if they develop that road. Right, so it's gonna be

1:56:51Well we have it's emergency access to Hadlock only. Um but I think that language is fine, Mr. County Attorney.

1:56:57I think you could you could put it potentially it could connect.

1:57:00Well so we had a neighborhood meeting and the gentleman that lives to the south that owns half of that road. I was very happy that it was emergency access only. I actually had to s I had we had to send we had to send them the language. That road is that road is a private road owned by a whole bunch of people. The chances of that actually ever being anything, I guess unless they're all bought out, which I guess could occur, but um I don't know what you guys want to do. So I think it's important to him.

1:57:29Is if if it if it if you open it or if it gets open for them, not for to not to go down Hadlock, but but if they come in it's the impact to your project that the commissioner was concerned about, the interconnection. So

1:57:48our emergency access?

1:57:50Well if if it was opened to the people to the south to use the public road, that would impact your town homes.

1:57:59Right, but it's not because we have a condition that says it can only be emergency access. I don't want that condition. For now. You can't

1:58:05change that.

1:58:07Yes, we can. If you want us to write a condition that says 'cause we've written 'em before, it goes against what the gentleman was told, but it's up to you all. Not uh now, but uh he was He owns half of that road. I mean it's he's been over half of his property. How about it

1:58:22so he wants it changed that can be changed. 'Cause one day

1:58:27this

1:58:27property will probably get developed. Yeah

1:58:31and we'll we have conditions that say and I and it's I can think of the one family uh trail I think it was that has a condition that says If it's ever approved a standard condition, then we then it has to be an access and not just emergency access. There is that language that exists if that's how you want that to read. And we can make those changes to the documents. Well,

1:58:53we're really we're really only talking about a disclosure statement.

1:58:56So if

1:58:56you you want to say interconnected to the parcel to the east and may at some point in the future be interconnected to the south.

1:59:03But I have to come back for a substantial amendment to make to change that from emergency emergency access. I mean if it's if there's a condition that says it's emergency access only coming back for two public hearing to change that, so Um

1:59:16Yeah.

1:59:18And they've probably been telling people that's emergency only.

1:59:22I can tell you that he reviewed our language.

1:59:25I

1:59:26the the customer on the street has an agreement. I think we need to s stand by it to change it without that customer knowing. I think it'd be wrong at this point in time.

1:59:36Well I think if well this is I was trying to make it where the customer is in the driver's seat. If when if and when his property gets developed, he he may very well want that. Well

1:59:45guess what? We actually have this language. Oh. Thank you, Christy. It's condition twenty-three and then that comes to Mr. County Attorney here where he's gonna add his language, but it does say condition twenty-three the last sentence. Notwithstanding if when the property to the south of the M Pud boundary is redeveloped, the emergency access may be converted to a functional access if approved by the county.

2:00:05Perfect.

2:00:06So perfect. Look at that.

2:00:07Well done, Christie. That's what we need in all of these.

2:00:16Okay. Um public comment. Anyone want to speak uh against this item that was on the consent agenda?

2:00:23Madam Chair, I have no one signed up and no one on WebEx for this item.

2:00:27Move approval with the access conditions stated by the county attorney. Second.