An Ordinance By The Board Of County Commissioners Of Pasco County, Florida, Dissolving Highlands Municipal Service Benefit Unit, Consisting Of Seven Distinct Units As Of December 31, 2025, And Providing For An Effective Date And Applicability.
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approve
DispositionDenied
Denied to adopt the Ordinance dissolving the Highlands MSBU by a roll call vote.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, May 20, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, May 20, 2025
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
This case, across meetings
PIFBA-25-0319 in full →Heard once. PIFBA-25-0319 appears on no other agenda in the archive.
- May 20, 2025BoardP46▶Deniedthis item
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 78% of 51 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Good afternoon, Chairman, Commissioners, I'm Jerry Williams, Public Infrastructure, Fiscal and Business Administration Department. TIFPA 250319, an ordinance by the Board of County Commissioners of Pasco County, Florida, dissolving Highlands Municipal Service Benefit, consisting of seven distinct units, as of December 31st, 2025, and providing for an effective date and applicability.
So on June eighteenth, 2024, ordinance number 2431, the Road Rehabilitation Services Municip Municipal Service Taxing Unit, MSTU. Was approved by the Board of County Commissioners. So Highlands Railways are now maintained under the parameters of the Road Rehabilitation Services MSTU. So Highlands consists of seven units. 36.5 road miles, 742 ERUs, and 3,288 acres.
And this is a roadmap. I mean I'm sorry, this is a map depicting the boundaries of the MSBU.
Oh yeah.
Itemizing the respective units.
So the recommended action is to accept public comment and adopt the proposed ordinance.
Okay, I do want to comment on this, um, but let's see if there's any public comment.
Madam Chair.
Okay, none. Yeah.
Um Uh Jerry, great job on this and I think it's it's it's good to bring it forward. However there's one. thing that I think the board should think about and maybe we postpone this to further discussion through the summer as we look at what we're gonna do.
Yeah
I don't I
don't think we should get rid of it.
Okay. And I'm going to go along that way. B just because as we look at, let's say, dirt roads, the reason we have seven districts here, not just geographical, the different road conditions. Some of these things are in great shape, some are in just terrible shape, dirt roads that need a lot of work. And I think if we're going to be looking at trying to maximize the dollars we put in for the uh MSTU, MSBU we put in for transportation, we may need this. To help fund some of these roads that want to get done, but you you need the funding source in place. So I think it's going to be
good to actually I don't know, Mike, how long do you think?
Well whether you continue it or you just choose to leave it on the books and adopt a zero, uh you know, you can Yeah.
That's what I would say.
Keep it at zero and just let's leave
it.
I'm I'm good with that for now.
So does the board wish to withdraw this ordinance.
Yes. But I I do.
Yeah, that
would have to be it.
And then
when we
come back over the summer when we are setting various millages and MSBUs, staff would recommend setting the the assessment at zero dollars.
So I I'd need a motion from the board to To deny adoption of of the ordinance dissolving the Highlands Municipal Service Benefit Unit and it can always be readvertised in Sure.
Yes.
I just
want to be careful. I mean these folks are paying the road MSTU I just make it zero. Uh well it's still on there and could be funded. I mean there's a chance potentially that they could end up double taxed if we're not This board changes. Um So it's just a concern? I'm fine with leaving it at zero. It's just a b I see a a vulnerability for Double taxation for these folks.
Madam Chair. Yeah. And and I'm okay with bringing it back at a s some point, maybe bring it back next year. So it's still fresh in everybody's mind. Some of these roads are in terrible shape, some are in great shape. And that's right-this different categories I said is in there. I think setting it at zero is fine and then we can look at it again next year. But I think leaving place rather than reconstructing it which should take a lot more time and effort I think the wiser thing is just set it for zero for this year and we can revisit it next year. No matter what happens. Okay.
Yeah, we'll have a further idea of when they may be getting to them.
I'll second
that.
Yeah. Okay. Um it's a roll call vote. So
Madam I don't know that there was a motion. I'm I put it on the record.
And before the motion I just wanna tell for the record that no one is signed up uh in person and no one on WebEx for this item.
Okay. Anybody who w was here to wish to speak to the Highlands Ridge Road and Bridge District? Seeing none. I
will move to set the assessment for zero.
But what I we need need to get th this advertised public hearing dispensed with. So it would would be the to deny adoption of the ordinance for dissolving the Highlands. Okay. I deny adoption of the ordinance. Second.
Roll cover. Okay. District One Commissioner Oakley.
Aye.
District two, Commissioner Weightman.
Aye.
District four, Commissioner Yeager. Uh District five, Commissioner Mariano.
Aye.
District three, Chairman Starkey.
Aye. This is an unusual meeting.
Okay, P forty-eight. Is this a continuance?
47.