Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
P79No disposition in the minutesPublic hearingPublished agenda

Petition to Vacate Platted Right-of-Way (Regular) – Regina Drive, Hudson - Hi- Tech Collision Centers, Inc. – No Funding Required

Public Hearings at 1:30 p.m.FAC-25-0180District 5

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approve

No disposition in the minutes

The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 16, 2025

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Sep 16, 2025

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

FAC-25-0180 in full →

Heard once. FAC-25-0180 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Sep 16, 2025BoardP79No disposition in the minutesthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 10m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 68% of 80 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →

Taken up 2 times, not once through — set aside and returned to. Each stretch is below, in the order it happened.

1/2Taken up at Afternoon session, 49:46

Unidentified speakerVoice A

You don't give a room.

Amanda Hill

But you need to swear people in?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

You need procedures.

There are two rezoning agendas regular and consent. If staff will present each application to the board Staff will present each application to the Board of County Commissioners. If staff or planning commission has recommended approval and there's no opposition, the application will be considered by the Board without further presentation if staff or Planning Commission has recommended denial or if there is opposition to the application, the applicant will be given five minutes for presentation, the opposition will be given three minutes for each individual, or five minutes for a

group representative. And the applicant will be given three minutes for rebuttal. Any individual disagreeing with staff or planning commission recommendation or anyone wishing to object to any condition of the rezoning may at this time request the petition be pulled. from the consent agenda, in which case that application will be heard under the regular agenda later on during the meeting. Otherwise, all rezoning applications on the consent agenda will be approved, by a single motion and vote. If you wish to speak to any petition, please give your name and address and

whether or not you've been sworn for the record. These are quasi judicial public hearing. The law in Florida is that mere public support or opposition of an application is insufficient for this board to take action. Please limit your comments to those criteria found Within the board's land development code for rezoning. Madam Clerk, would you like to sore anybody in the public in that wishes to speak?

Oakley

I will. Um if you're here to speak on any of the matter uh matters to come before the board, please stand.

I guess it's just you.

Please raise your right hand. Well that's a first. I know. Are you sure? You don't want to speak to any idea? Okay. Uh do you swear or affirm the testimony you're about to give is the truth, so help you God. Thank you. You may proceed.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Good afternoon, Commissioner. Jamie Smith Rail Property Division.

Oakley

I'm sorry, Ms. Smith. Let me go ahead and do publication on P twenty nine. My apologies. Um I don't seventy-nine. What did I say?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

29.

Oakley

Yep, that's not it. P seventy-nine was published in the Tampa Bay Times on August 10th, 2025, and August 17th, 2025. Thank you.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

The real property team has received a petition to vacate a plated right-of-way, Regina Drive, in its entirety. Together with the internal lot lines one through six, filled, uh it was filed by High Tech Collision Centers, Incorporated. Well.

It's everything that's highlighted in yellow.

The purpose of this vacation is to allow high-tech collision centers incorporated easier access to the back of their properties as well as occasional overflow parking.

There were no objections to this petition and the real property team recommends approval. Can you go back to that? Ariel.

StarkeyChair

That one.

Are they? W what are all those structures down there at the bottom?

Structures on the bottom. I mean, I think it's a good idea. Is that a How that's supposed to work, this code? I'm asking I don't know who know here.

Storing all those vehicles like that.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

It looks like it's parking a lot.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

It is parking in the back of the structure that's closer to Bolton Ave uh as the coll the collision center.

Unidentified speakerVoice C

Mm-hmm.

StarkeyChair

Yeah.

Those big trucks and things at the southern end of the property. And and I and I'm trying to understand, is the whole property concreted? There's no So

Unidentified speakerVoice D

the Wolf um Royal Property Division. The southern property consists of overflow parking currently for the Collision Center. That's where they park the cars that are being worked on for body body shop purposes and they wish to vacate uh that portion of Regina Drive to further expand on that so that they're not going to be able to do that. So

StarkeyChair

they're already using the road. So our property. And and where's their stormwater ponds and all that for their business? Since I see all that concrete. I'm just curious.

Unidentified speakerVoice D

I don't believe that the property has any stormwater requirements. Uh there were no objections internally and they were not identified by the applicants. Survey. We do have the petitioners applic the sir uh attorney for the petitioner. I believe they're on WebEx.

StarkeyChair

I just think that's a permitted operation there. That I that's what I'm asking.

It du 'cause I don't s see how they They can do all that concrete without having any stormwater. Run off. ponds or anything and and that's not to our code either. So I'm just trying to understand if this is a legal business because if they're operating without permits, why do I want to give 'em Our property.

Maybe they are. Just I just asking staff, someone tell me.

Unidentified speakerVoice D

Uh we would ask that the applicant attorney speak to this matter.

StarkeyChair

Well I'll

Unidentified speakerVoice E

look it

StarkeyChair

up.

Unidentified speakerVoice E

I can look it up on my I am here on behalf of the applicant. If you would I don't know if you can hear me. I am uh appearing virtually

StarkeyChair

We can hear you.

Mike Carballa

So you have the question, this is Mike Carbala County Administrator, the question that uh the chairman has asked is is your client's property um appropriate is his activity in an appropriate zoning?

StarkeyChair

And permitted for that

Mike Carballa

use.

StarkeyChair

stormwater? No landscaping you know, I don't know what's required in this kind of use, but I just

Unidentified speakerVoice E

yes commissioners at this point they have all proper permitting that's required for their uh purpose of business. They are a car reparal shop. Um The only thing we are requesting is the uh vacation of Regina Avenue so that they can access the back of their site. But there have been no code issues. Um they are currently up to code with their business um up to permitting.

Oakley

Madam Madam Chair, um can we ask if she has been sworn in because

Unidentified speakerVoice A

she doesn't need to be, it's a v it's a vacation.

StarkeyChair

Thank you. Um can we can we come back to this and uh let's go to the next one and then has staff do some research on there for me? Yes. Um Okay, we'll come we'll come back to you. Okay.

Ooh, that's unreadable. I can't read that. Okay. So go on to the next one and then someone do some Get on P Pasco mapper

2/2Taken up again at Afternoon session, 1:03:35

StarkeyChair

Thanks, Keith. Okay, um I think we're we're able to go back to uh

Mike Carballa

So it's my understanding that it's a C two zoning and this is a body Shop which is an allowable use in C2.

StarkeyChair

And and they have all their permits that they don't have to they can cement that not have any stormwater runoff lines.

David Allen

So

Assistant County Administrator for Public Safety

they're

David Allen

the the the building footprint also is is consistent. With what we saw 30 years ago. So whatever is there is has been in place for that time and and probably met the requirements at the time it was constructed.

StarkeyChair

Okay, so if they're gonna um add concrete to have another access, it's gonna trigger something, right? They're gonna have to do that.

David Allen

Yeah, if they do site improvements they would need to come to the

easement.

StarkeyChair

Okay.

Oakley

Sure.

StarkeyChair

Commissioner Oakley.

Oakley

So the the parcel that we're talking about I'm I'm looking at it here but I don't see any lines on this. But the part in green with trees, that's where the roadway is?

StarkeyChair

They've already paved our road.

Oakley

So this is all pavement on On that part of the The road. I guess.

David Allen

Uh Commissioner Oakley. Uh uh the pavement is is generally on the western half of that right-of-way parcel.

Oakley

So rest that's just ground?

David Allen

Yes. Yeah. Okay. Thank you.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

So it appeared from the from staff's graphic that they own the two lots on one side of whatever that road is that right undeveloped right away is. And then the three lots on the other side.

So

StarkeyChair

just wondering if but the guy whoever owns the property on the right, do they want some of it too and split the

Unidentified speakerVoice D

same,

Unidentified speakerVoice A

yes. Oh excellent. Okay. The yellow box would be their their property holding. Right. Okay.

WeightmanSecond Vice Chair

Move

David Engel

approval?

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Second. Did you ask for public comment on this one? Is

StarkeyChair

there any public comment on this?

Oakley

Seeing none. All in favor?

StarkeyChair

Aye.

Oakley

The only individuals on WebEx were the two attorneys for the applicant. Okay. Well, they don't. They're done.

StarkeyChair

Just let you know. Okay. Um we will go to the um to the protest now, please. Oh

I got excited. I have stuff to say.

StarkeyChair

Good afternoon. Carrie Roberts, purchasing director here for R73, review of the County Attorney's Decision, County Administrator's decision in response to protest of solicitation number RFP LK25-100, Disaster Recovery Program Management Services, or to solicitation number RFP LK25-100 to IEM International Inc. in the amount of thirty-two, three hundred thirty-seven thousand one.