Conditional Use (Consent) – 1884 Robert Aborizk/T-Mobile South, LLC – 155- Foot Above-Ground-Level (AGL), Close-Mount Monopole Wireless Communications Facility (WCF) in an A-R Agricultural-Residential District – East Central Pasco County – On the North Side of Simons Road Approximately 1,360 Feet West of the Intersection of Simons Road and Fort King Road File Number PDE26-CU02
What the county recorded
Staff recommendation
Approval with Conditions
DispositionApproved
Approved the Public Hearing Consent Agenda which included Agenda Items P65 and P68.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 6, 2026
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jan 6, 2026
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 5m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 89% of 27 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
P65, we have proof of publication in the November 5th, 2025 edition of the Tampa Bay Times, supplemented by an affidavit of certified mailings and site postings. This is on consent.
We do just a moment, please.
We do not have anyone signed up for this one.
Okay.
No, there's consent right now. No masking.
No. It's the Chair just has to five or five
we have five consent items coming.
Okay. And just have to call for whether or not there is anybody who is objecting to this item. Right. Yeah.
All right, Amy Toll, Planning, Development, and Economic Growth. Item P65 is PDE 26-CU02. It's a conditional use request in the name of 1884 Robert Aberesk, T Mobile South LLC. For a 155-foot above-ground level AGL Closemount Monopole Wireless Communications Facility, WCF, in an AR agricultural residential district, located east-central in east-central Pastergrove County on
the north side of Simmons Road, approximately 1,360 feet west of the intersection of Simmons Road and Fort King Road. This comes with your recommendation of approved.
Okay. Is there anyone here to speak in opposition to P sixty five? Seeing no one, leave it on consent, B sixty six.
Approved publication Tampa Bay Times, November twenty-sixth, twenty twenty-five, and supplemented by an affidavit of certified mailings and site posting.
P66 is PDE 26-0024. It's a comprehensive plan amendment in the name of CPA 2502 North Pasco Resort, providing for transmittal of the Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment to Sub-area Policy Flu 7.1.63 North Pasco Resort. This comes with your with a recommendation of approval.
We have two people signed up for this matter.
Okay. We're gonna pull that off consent. We're gonna move to item P sixty-eight.
P 68, we have proof of publication, November 26, 2025, Tampa Bay Times, supplemented by an affidavit of certified mailings and site posting.
Item P sixty-eight is PDE twenty-six-seven nine zero zero. It's a zoning amendment in the name of R and S Properties, FLA, LLC, Bell Haven. It's a change in zoning from an expired MPD Master Plan Unit Development District to an R2 low density residential district located in south-central Pasco County at the intersection of Bell Lake Road and Peaceful Lane Road, containing approximately 5.53 acres. This item comes with you with
a recommendation to approve.
Okay. Is anyone here to speak in opposition to item P sixty eight? We have no one signed on it. Uh consent.
T 69.
Appropriate publication, Tampa Bay Times, November 5th, 2025, supplemented by an affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
Item P69 is PDE 26-7853. It's a substantial modification to Evans G2 MPUD in the name of Evans Property Inc. It's a substantial modification to the Evans G2 MPUD to increase the total residential dwelling units from 117 to 350 on approximately 37.45 acres. Located in the village of Pasadena Hills within Village G at the southwest corner
of the intersection of Kiefer Road and Hancart Road. This comes with you, uh comes to you with a recommendation of approval with conditions. I would like to make note the packet that you have on record that was published did not include two conditions that were added. During the LPA version, those were sent to the uh clerk's office for re for updating.
Okay.
Um I have questions on this one.
Is there gonna pull it from consent? Yes. Okay, I'm gonna pull that from consent. Okay, so the other consent items, we have a motion to approve?
Uh I make them?