Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
PC11No disposition in the minutesPublic hearingPublished agenda

Variance Request (Consent) – Donald & Angelique Barlow-Kearsley – Request to Reduce the Required Rear Yard Setback From 50 Feet to 17 Feet in an A-C Agricultural District as Required by LDC Section 503.8.C. – North Pasco County – On Trilby Road, Approximately 0.3 Miles North of the Intersection of Trilby Road and Blanton Road – Containing Approximately 10.16 Acres.

Approval of VariancePDE-26-2115District 1

What the county recorded

Published agenda

Staff recommendation

Approval of Variance

No disposition in the minutes

The approved minutes do not say what became of this item. That is a gap in the record, not a decision. It is the normal state for 24% of items. Most of those are regular business and board reports that the minutes do not dispose of in writing. This archive never infers an outcome from the fact that someone called a vote.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Jul 9, 2026

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

This case, across meetings

PDE-26-2115 in full →

Heard once. PDE-26-2115 appears on no other agenda in the archive.

  1. Jul 9, 2026PlanningPC11No disposition in the minutesthis item

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 7m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 73% of 44 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Moody

Item PC 11. This item was polled. It's PDE 262115. It's a variance request in the name of Donald and Angelique Barlow Kersley for a request to reduce the rear yard setback from 50 feet to 17 feet in an AC agricultural district as required by LDC Section 503.8. Located in North Pasco County on Trilby Road, approximately point. Miles north of the intersection of Trolby Road and Blanton Road, containing approximately 10.6 acres, to

be presented by staff.

GreyChair

Okay.

Amy Heiler

Good afternoon. Amy Toll with Planning Development and Economic Growth. Item before you today is PDE 26-2115 in the name of Trilby Road variance. The variance is a request to reduce the rear yard setback in an AC agricultural district from fifty feet to seventeen feet. So the petition number is uh VA-2115. It is a zoning variance. The current zoning district,

as previously noted, is AC agricultural. Future land use is AG Agricultural. The purpose is to reduce the required rear yard setback in the AC Agricultural District from 50 feet to 17 feet, and the location is at 32005 Troby Road. Which is approximately point three miles uh north of Blandon Road. Here's a visual of the subject site. It is within the North Market area and Northeast Pasco Rural Area or Rural Area One.

Here's a context map showing the subject site in proximity to Blanton Road.

Your close up aerial view.

These subjects cites future land use of AG.

The zoning of A C agricultural

Here's the property survey map that shows the barn and the single family, which is has been converted into a single family dwelling. I'll go into the findings of fact of that.

So the subject site, just project overview, consists of agricultural pursuits, a barn that was converted into a single family dwelling, another barn and an additional structure. The subject site is unplatted on ten point one six acres. So in 2001, there was an unfinished detached barn that was built because the subject site is zoned agricultural, so it was for agricultural activities. The barn was considered an accessory structure to the primary

use of agriculture, which is permitted as a principal use. In November of 2016, the previous property. Owner built the barn in addition to a two-stall garage addition. Eventually, they were converted into the single-family dwelling that's in a request today. On March 31st, 2023, the applicant actually purchased the property after these changes were made, and they purchased the property under the presumption

that it was a residence. So on October October thirtieth, in two thousand twenty-five, the applicant received a citation warning for the unpermitted structure, which resulted in this variance request.

And with that, we actually recommend approval of the proposed variance with conditions as set forth in the recommended conditions section below.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Yeah.

Amy Heiler

Sure. Which slide would you like?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

That that one that's

Amy Heiler

okay.

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Two thousand one the

Unidentified speakerVoice A

And then in twenty sixteen the three years property with the barn. Did you install it?

Unidentified speakerVoice B

Raj Edition

Unidentified speakerVoice A

twenty sixteen. Did Brown already have a an aggregate called for it? Yeah, yeah. Property razor.

Amy Heiler

Uh I don't know the answer to that, but I could probably find that out fairly quickly. Sure.

GreyChair

Okay, anything else? Thank you, Amy.

Think you can find that out today? Okay. All right. The applicant present.

Okay. You want to come forward or is there anybody here to object?

Moody

Mr. Chair, I did have one individual signed up to speak on this, uh Ms. Linda Ward.

GreyChair

Ms. Linda Ward.

Pardon me?

No, I'm sorry, you can't speak from the floor. That you just need to come to the mic, we can't get it on tape and if you don't. Sorry to make you come all the way up but

We need your name and address.

Unidentified speakerVoice C

It's Linda Ward, [address removed]. And I have been on that property since Ninety three. When I purchased it from Doctor Bd Um and just after I would say Ninety six, maybe ninety seven. The people that owned it then were the Williamses. Um Evelyn, I forget his name, but they actually lived in

the bar that was there. They may have added on to it since. Right. But they lived in that dwelling itself and had a contractor come in and put a little kitchen, little bathroom, so on so forth. But that's the only thing I can add other than why they'd be

made a an issue now. I d I just didn't understand that.

Okay. Are you

Unidentified speakerVoice A

opposed to this variance?

GreyChair

I don't think so.

Unidentified speakerVoice C

No, I think they should be able to stay. They're wonderful people.

GreyChair

Thank you. Yeah.

You can take over the pie later.

Is would the applicant have anything to comment? Okay. Any questions from up here? If not, do I hear a motion?

Christopher Poole

Motion to approve. Second.

GreyChair

Motion and second for the discussion. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, like, sign. Motion carries. Enjoy your residence. Fine.

And the pie, yeah.