Consent rezoning agenda P47 and P48
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 26, 2024
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Mar 26, 2024
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 2m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
We approved publication of this matter in the February seventh uh 2024 edition temper time, supplemented by affidavit of certified mailings and site postings.
P47 is PEG 240171. It's a development agreement for KRILA State's LLC. It's a development agreement for the construction of the multi-use path and for the award of mobility fee credits for the design, permitting, and construction of the off-site improvements of the multi-use path and for the difference between the cost of the required five-foot sidewalk on-site and the constructed multi-use path. Comes to you with a recommendation. Of approval uh from the Planning and Economic Growth Department and the local planning agency who found it consistent with the comprehensive
plan.
Okay. Is there anyone in the audience or online to speak in opposition to item P forty seven?
Seeing no one leave it on consent? Item P forty eight.
Proof of publication again in the February seventh, uh Tampa Bay Times and supplemented by certified mailings and site postings.
P forty eight is PEG twenty four seven seven seven zero zoning amendment Brina M. Hicks. It's for a change in zoning from an RMH mobile home district to a PO1 professional office district. Comes to you with a recommendation of approval from the Planning and Develop Planning and Economic Growth Department, sorry, and the Planning Commission.
Okay. Does anyone Here to speak in opposition of item P forty eight.
Leave it on consent.
And that concludes your consent agenda.
We have a motion.
Move to approve the consent agenda.
Second.
All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. Item P forty-nine, do we have proof?