Authorize Great Western Surety takeover agreement
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 7, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Dec 7, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 56% of 27 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay.
Um I rarely do this, but given that this is your last meeting in December, um well this is actually for Commissioner Moore's benefit, so Um Uh we have been negotiating with Great Western Surety for a takeover agreement for DAB's um projects. Um their lawyer did not get back to us today, so I don't have anything to say.
Please authorize us to be to do something that's substantially similar to this, but if you would authorize the county administrator to sign a takeover agreement that has been approved by the County County Attorney's Office that is substantially similar to that which DOT entered into to them. Um God speed. That way that way we don't have to wait until January if we finally come to some
negotiation. She made a motion. I made a second. All in favor?
Aye.
What about fifty two? Well
here about fifty two. Matter of fact, let me explain s let me explain too what's going on so they're aware of it and I wasn't even gonna bring it up, but it's it's important that you all know. So the new So as we know, the D A B defaulted, Diverging Diamond, fifty two, they've all been selected. Fifty four we're still waiting on. Unfortunately, the surety is trying to How was kind of word it? Tie our hands with compl with moving forward with this in a ta there's two separate there was two separate
bonds, there's two separate takeover agreements, one's for the state's project and there's this little small obviously a small project that the county has as well. They're really tying things up, waiting for our agreement when they literally do not have to. They could start on this road tomorrow.
Well
through this
And I'm I was told that Based on Secretary Gwynn's
conversation with
me. Conversation with you and That there was actually equipment moving out on fifty six this weekend. So I think D O T's portion is in fact moving forward out of the interstate.
Fifty four, you mean?
Fifty four.
Fifty four. Fifty four. Good. Yes.
Started on fifty six, right? I thought I'd
So that's still fifty-six is part of the diverging diamond. But yes. So I had thankfully, thankful to thank thanks to Secretary Gwynn. I had multiple calls with them and Jeff and Dan this week. So if you s heard that today. Yeah. That's news I haven't heard, so thank thankfully.
It was I was told fifty six, but Well fifty
six is a whole different project.
Yeah.
Okay. But that was also DAV, was it not?
Yes, about
that.
Yeah, but that they've already started that project.
They started that project a month ago.
Well that's what was going on. They were trying to and I I hate to say it, I think they're trying to use the county as leverage. And uh Yeah. It's not cool. Not DOT's fault.