consent agenda PC1-PC3: 54 crossings and variances
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 95% of 20 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
All right. I think we can begin. Excuse
me.
Yes, please. Yes. If you would s anyone who plans to give testimony today, if you could stand and be sworn, please.
Raise
your right hand. Do you swear or from the testimony you're about to give is the truth to help you guys?
They seemed a little tentative on that one.
Good afternoon, Planning Commission Members. Denise Hernandez, Planning and Development. Item PC one is PDD 200037. It's a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment. CPAL 1915, 54 crossings. It's a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment to future land use maps 2-15 and sheet 20 for a change in the comp plan from res 3, residential three-dwelling units per gross acre, to office on approximately. Approximately 12.81 acres. And this comes to you with a recommendation that you today recommend approval
to the Board of County Commissioners and you find the Complant Amendment consistent with the Pasco County. uh comprehensive plan. On this item you are sitting as a local planning agency.
All right. Is the applicant present? Any is there anyone here to object? I don't see any objections.
Item PC2, you're back at the Planning Commission. Uh PDD 2020. In the name, this is a variance in the name of James and Anne-Marie Allen. It's for a reduction in the required minimum rear setback from 5 feet to 3.3 feet from the rear property line and a reduction in the required minimum setback from 15 feet to 5.5 feet from the main high water line for screen pool enclosure on waterfront property in an R4 high density residential line. district. This comes here with a recommendation of approval with conditions.
Is the applicant present? Anyone here to object? Uh don't see any problem.
Item PC three is PDD 2020. This is a variance request as well, in the name of West Pasco Habitat for Humanity, Inc. is for a reduction in the required minimum south front setback from five feet to six inches for a driveway, and a reduction in the required minimum south front setback from 15 feet to 12.5 feet for a single-family dwelling on each lot being small lots of record in an RMH. Mobile Home District. This is for lots twenty-eight and sixty-nine. This comes to you with a recommendation of approval with
conditions.
All right. Any applicants present?
Anyone here to object? Mr. Chairman, I just have a I have one question on that one. So my question is, has the City of Newport Ritchie been notified?
Yes, the City of Newport Ritchie and it's in your agenda packet. The City of Newport Ritchie was notified through our interlocal agreement. We did not receive any comments from the City of Newport Ritchie.
Thank you. Leave it on consent. All right, great. Okay. Move for approval of the consent
agenda. You have a motion to approve consent?
No second.
We have a second. Any further discussion? All in favor? Aye. Opposed? All right. Those who are on consent are free to do that. Take off and have a nice day.