Motion to approve consent agenda as amended
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2020
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 90% of 20 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
All right, so uh So that remains on consent. And do I hear a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended and noting the uh uh you know the comments rel relative to this uh by Jamie Gerardi and uh his recusal. On PC nine.
I'll make a motion, Chris Wool, to approve the consent agenda consisting of PC two, PC three, PC four, PC six, PC seven, and PC eight.
M PC nine as well.
DC9.
We'll do that one separately.
That one separately, please. Okay. Because Mr. Jordan can't vote on the motion unless you do it separately.
Okay.
Do I have a second?
Peter Hansel, second.
All right. All in favor of the motion? Signified by roll call?
Jamie Girardi? Bye. Michael Cox?
Bye.
Peter Hansel.
Hi.
Robert sorry, Christopher Christopher Poole.
Hi.
Chris Williams?
Aye. And
Chairman Charles Gray.
Aye.