Noted item PDD200640 correction of scrivener's error agenda memo
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2020
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Sep 3, 2020
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 1m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 83% of 6 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
Okay, it's back to me. Um, your last item on the agenda is a noted item, PDD 200640. This is for the correction of a scrivener's error on the agenda memo that was presented to the Planning Commission on August 6th of 2020. Um, so when we presented that agenda memo to you, um inadvertently we had excluded two parcels. So um we're just uh correcting that scrivener's error. The the actual item was correctly noticed, posted. And
all the visuals did include the total of the three parcels, but we inadvertently only included one parcel as opposed to the three. So this is just a noted item to correct a Squidner's error.
All right.
And no action is required on that. It's just uh FYI.
Okay.
And that's the end of your agenda.