Skip to main content
Pasco Countymeeting record
Not on the published agendaStaff reportInferred

Bettmar Acres stormwater utility assessment clarification

What the county recorded

This item is not from the published agenda

It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.

The source document

Published agenda

The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 11, 2025

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

Approved minutes

The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Feb 11, 2025

The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.

What was said

Transcript

Machine transcription of 4m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 60% of 20 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.

Read it in the meeting →
Unidentified speakerVoice A

Um this morning speaker on Bettmar Acres, uh just for the board's clarification, this is not a tax issue, this is a stormwater utility assessment that Bettmar is uh uh experiencing on their golf course. They have for a number of years. Um and um we dealt dealt with the Bentmar Acre's lawyers

about five years ago and thought the issue was put to bed. Um our position is still that they our code the assessment. Um that they owe us the assessment um because it is a 403, Chapter 403, you stormwater utility, not a tax, not a general special assessment.

But that's you know that our position has been that for some time. They have spoken to both they have spoken to to the previous lawyer that was involved in that position and Ms. Wolf Graham, who is the current lawyer in that position.

I'm not sure that there's anything that we can resolve with them, but

MarianoVice Chair

Miss question. Mm-hmm. We like golf courses and we've designed a lot of them to take rainwater, stormwater Um Reclaim water. Why would we tax them for stormwater utility if they're actually part of the solution for stormwater?

Because they're

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Good question. It's not an operational sound. Yeah, good question.

I'm not I I I was not here when the stormwater utility was developed. That is something clearly we can we can review with um the infrastructure branch and see what whether there whether that's an exemption we could we should think about. Uh Um

was dealing with the facts as I

MarianoVice Chair

tell them I

think.

And we're just giving 'em so I get it. I think we should take a look at that because I think if I'm gonna have a golf course it's gonna take stormwater like I want 'em to, like Seven Springs, Timber Oaks used to. Um, it's a benefit to us and We're really trying to tax the ones that don't and all the people around it, the ERUs where they will condensed. They're paying their ERU, so I think I think it's something that she'll take a look at and bring back. Okay.

Oakley

Some of the issue that we have down there is uh Batmar it's going to the association, the HOA group that looks after the golf course. They're getting that bill, but their members don't want to pay it and the members won't allow 'em to raise their fees for the golf course to take care of that. So it ends up on them all the time and I don't think they end up they have a struggle to get the money up for that. So that's what the issue's been.

MarianoVice Chair

Okay. And and and you know what golf courses is are I know elsewhere around the struggle. So I think it's I think it's good to take a burden off 'em if we can. Um and if and again, because they're actually helping the stormwater situation. I don't think we should be taxing them for what they're helping on. But yeah, if you want to bring it back, that'd be great.

Unidentified speakerVoice A

Okay. That's

MarianoVice Chair

it. All right. I'm going

to

go to my committee report so I'm going

to

go right to you, Mr. Mr. County Attorney. When we heard the people today from Beacon Park come in to speak. There were hearings years ago, I went back back to 06, where initially that development was supposed to access through Buffalo Drive. Then it's switched over to another hearing where they allow them to go to the Aqua Clara, which is only a short short little drive to get in. They've taken advantage of the public roads to go use their access to go in and David Engel and David Goldstein and David Allen al