P5 transportation element comprehensive plan amendments
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Planning Commission, Nov 4, 2021
The published PDF. Its text could not be extracted — it is an image-only scan — so nothing in it is searchable here, but it reads normally.
The county’s minutes for Planning Commission, Nov 4, 2021
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 100% of 25 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
All right, thank you. Denise, before we get to P C three, was P five on regular because there's opposition or
P five is on regular because it's a uh That's something that is presented to the local planning agency. Did you want Amir to do P5?
I he can, I just that I I don't know that there's any requirement that it had to be going regular. It could have been on consent. Unless
Does staff want to do a presentation to planning commission on it?
We can put it we can uh
As long as there anyone here to object to P five?
not have to be audio, it's not even
a little bit of a little bit of a little bit of a Well, unless Planning Commission has questions about it. You don't have to have a presentation. It's up to you all. I I just try to speed things along.
Right. Okay.
If there's no opposition and no questions, it doesn't make sense to go
through the
process.
Okay, well I'll read it into record.
Okay.
And um so on P on P five you're sitting as a local planning agency. So today what we're asking you to do is define these proposed amendments consistent with the Pasco County comprehensive
plan.
Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. So P5 is PDD 22005A. It's a comprehensive plan amendment. See PAL 21, forensic 04, Chapter 7, transportation element. This is to providing for text amendments to Chapter 7, transportation element, Table 7-2A, quarter preservation, and repealing Table 7-2B, providing for map amendments to The Highway Vision Plan and Functional Class Map, Map 7-36, and the Transportation
Corridor Preservation Map, Map 7-35, and providing for additional text amendments as necessary for internal consistency. Again, you're sitting as a local planning agency on this item. We're asking that you find it consistent with the Pasco County Comprehensive Plan and recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners.
Thank you, Denise. So does anyone here have an objection?
No. No.
Okay. If not, then
I'll hear a motion.
Make a motion to accept the amendments as presented. Okay, have a
motion and then can we have a second? All second. Okay, we're mocking a second. Any further discussion of the motion? All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion carries.
Okay.