Lot trees in townhome duplex block requirements
What the county recorded
This item is not from the published agenda
It is a stretch of the recording that this archive identified as a separate matter — a call to order, a recess, or something taken up that the agenda does not list. There is no official title, no staff recommendation and no disposition, because the county never recorded one. Everything below is inferred.
The source document
The county’s agenda for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 21, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
The county’s minutes for Board of County Commissioners, Jun 21, 2022
The published PDF, as served by the county. This item is one entry in it.
What was said
Machine transcription of 3m of recording, with speaker names inferred from voice matching. 57% of 14 lines carry a name. It shows what was said, not what was decided, and both the words and the names can be wrong.
All in favor? I oppose. We're doing a county initiated Planning exercise at Gunnan fifty four? Um so that it doesn't get yeah, chewed up and gets planned well. Um so Brad, I had a question for you. And I I'm sorry, you may not may may be for Terry. I'm not sure, but this is the first time I've read uh had a project like this that I've read. And I'm looking at the um town homes. And it says that a
lot trees within a town home or duplex block may be a shade tree, an understory tree, or a palm tree. Um So it can't be queen palms or crepe mortals, but we can put like a a Lugustum tree or I mean like a Why are we allowing under s uh understory trees? I guess that's my question.
Uh it it's essentially the same issue that we've come up with. Uh when you come to a townhome property, you have a number of areas that are uh driveway spaces that obviously you don't plant on, uh and then other spaces that are related to utility lines, service lines, soft utilities, hard utilities, everything else going to those units. and working through those units. And that creates some issues for roots and other things. So there are going to be situations where you will need some other form of tree or some other
form of landscaping in certain areas.
Well should we have a little bit more than that? I mean but this lets everybody who may not have those situations get away with just putting a little bush and and no trees. I mean 'cause a Lugustum tree can be f five feet, six feet high or something. And um and on the palm tree Do we it's not three to one, it's just one? So
we can uh do you want to Talk about going back and looking at this some more. Yeah. I think we're gonna get abused. That's all. Not more specific. We did talk in another situation on a on a on a on a different section of code about having a height minimum. Yes, we did.
Of this. But you know, it would be whatever ends up in code can be addressed through an alt standard uh to deal with that. So if we are too restrictive and and something that the projects can't do, they would need to be doing an alternative standard to request deviation. We are actually trying to avoid that uh because of the the work for something that we generally need to allow anyway. Um so it was kind of uh six of one half dozen the other, which direction we went.
Well if we put a height a height res uh you know, if we say it has to be at least this high, then we avoid what happened in your dist who's got Union Park? I mean I'm happy to put the picture back up if you want to see it again.
I've been out there many times.
Yeah. So um we just need to not let that happen anymore. So whatever it is to
certainly go back and look at that and look at maybe adding a a height minimum to to those plantings.
And is it
one palm tree or Uh I believe it is it does say one, right? But it's a particular types.
But we do have we call out the types. I mean it's not gonna be a pick me date palm. Yes.